Literature DB >> 27630951

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.

Harsh S Patel1, Anil M Managutti2, Shailesh Menat3, Arvind Agarwal4, Dishan Shah1, Jigar Patel1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tooth extraction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in dentistry. It is usually a traumatic procedure often resulting in immediate destruction and loss of alveolar bone and surrounding soft tissues. Various instruments have been described to perform atraumatic extractions which can prevent damage to the paradental structures. Recently developed physics forceps is one of the instruments which is claimed to perform atraumatic extractions. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of physics forceps with conventional forceps in terms of operating time, prevention of marginal bone loss & soft tissue loss, postoperative pain and postoperative complications following bilateral premolar extractions for orthodontic purpose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective split-mouth study, outcomes of the 2 groups (n = 42 premolars) requiring extraction of premolars for orthodontic treatment purpose using Physics forceps and Conventional forceps were compared. Clinical outcomes in form of time taken, loss of buccal soft tissue and buccal cortical plate based on extraction defect classification system, postoperative pain and other complication associated with extraction were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in the operating time was noted in physics forceps group. Marginal bone loss and soft tissue loss was also significantly lesser in physics forceps group when compared to conventional forceps group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in severity of postoperative pain between both groups.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that physics forceps was more efficient in reducing operating time and prevention of marginal bone loss & soft tissue loss when compared to conventional forceps in orthodontically indicated premolar extractions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atraumatic extractions; Bone loss; Cortical plate; Exodontia instrumentation; Extraction complications; Soft tissue loss

Year:  2016        PMID: 27630951      PMCID: PMC5020268          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  8 in total

1.  Some early dental extraction instruments including the pelican, bird or axe?

Authors:  H F Atkinson
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.291

2.  Complications of exodontia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Gokul Parameswar Venkateshwar; Mukul Nandkumar Padhye; Aman Rajiv Khosla; Shruti Tejprakash Kakkar
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

3.  Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management.

Authors:  Nicholas Caplanis; Jaime L Lozada; Joseph Y K Kan
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2005-11

4.  Atraumatic extractions: a biomechanical rationale.

Authors:  Carl E Misch; Helena M Perez
Journal:  Dent Today       Date:  2008-08

Review 5.  Technological advances in extraction techniques and outpatient oral surgery.

Authors:  Adam Weiss; Avichai Stern; Harry Dym
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04-03

6.  Split-mouth comparison of physics forceps and extraction forceps in orthodontic extraction of upper premolars.

Authors:  Samyuktha Hariharan; Vinod Narayanan; Chen Loong Soh
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 7.  Exodontia: tips and techniques for better outcomes.

Authors:  Harry Dym; Adam Weiss
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2012-01

8.  Atraumatic vertical tooth extraction: a proof of principle clinical study of a novel system.

Authors:  Egon Muska; Clemens Walter; Alan Knight; Pankaj Taneja; Yogesh Bulsara; Michael Hahn; Mayur Desai; Thomas Dietrich
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-07-03
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Use of Physics Forceps in Atraumatic Orthodontic Extractions of Bilateral Premolars: A Randomized Control Clinical Study.

Authors:  Sarika Kapila; Tejinder Kaur; Ramandeep Singh Bhullar; Amneet Sandhu; Amit Dhawan; Amoldeep Kaur
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-05-05

2.  Comparison of the efficiency of arm force versus arm force plus wrist movement in closed method extractions an observational study.

Authors:  Prashanth Sundaram; Saravanan Kandasamy; Reena Rachel John; K C Keerthana Sri
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-15

3.  Comparative evaluation of efficacy of Physics Forceps versus conventional forceps in pediatric dental extractions: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Sainath Reddy Elicherla; Sujatha Bandi; Mahesh Nunna; Kanamarlapudi Venkata Saikiran; Varada Sahithi; Sivakumar Nuvvula
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 4.  Are Physics Forceps Less Traumatic than Conventional Forceps for Tooth Extraction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar Singh; Nikita Khanal; Nisha Acharya; Dinesh Rokaya; Md Riasat Hasan; Takashi Saito
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  Efficacy of the Atraumatic Physics Forceps Over Conventional Extraction Forceps in Extraction of Tooth-Does it Offer an Alternative in All Types of Extraction or Only can be Used in Few Selected Types of Extraction: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Shyamalendu Laskar; Mamta Singh; Anshika Suman; Satyajit Sahu; Bibhu P Mishra; Abhijeeta Sahoo
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.