Literature DB >> 27630852

Comparison of Cell Preparations between Commercially Available Filter Cards of the Cytospin with Custom Made Filter Cards.

Vani Krishnamurthy1, Suchitha Satish2, Srinivasa Murthy Doreswamy3, Manjunath Gubbanna Vimalambike4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cytological evaluation of body fluids is an important diagnostic technique. Cytocentrifuge has contributed immensely to improve the diagnostic yield of the body fluids. Cytocentrifuge requires a filter card for absorbing the cell free fluid. This is the only consumable which needs to be purchased from the manufacturer at a significant cost. AIM: To compare the cell density in cytocentrifuge preparations made from commercially available filter cards with custom made filter cards.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective analytical study undertaken in department of pathology of a tertiary care centre. A 300 GSM handmade paper with the absorbability similar to the conventional card was obtained and fashioned to suit the filter card slot of the cytospin. Thirty seven body fluids were centrifuged using both conventional and custom made filter card. The cell density was measured as number of cells per 10 high power fields. The median cell density was compared using Mann-Whitney U test. The agreement between the values was analysed using Bland Altman analysis.
RESULTS: The median cell count per 10 High power field (HPF) with conventional card was 386 and that with custom made card was 408. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.66). There was no significant difference in the cell density and alteration in the morphology between the cell preparations using both the cards.
CONCLUSION: Custom made filter card can be used for cytospin cell preparations of body fluids without loss of cell density or alteration in the cell morphology and at a very low cost.

Keywords:  Body fluids; Cell density; Cytocentrifuge; Cytospin; Filter card

Year:  2016        PMID: 27630852      PMCID: PMC5020181          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20082.8204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  4 in total

1.  Preparation of cells for microscopy using cytospin.

Authors:  Cheryl M Koh
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations.

Authors:  Katsuhide Ikeda; Genshu Tate; Takao Suzuki; Takashi Kitamura; Toshiyuki Mitsuya
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 1.582

3.  The use of cytospin monolayer technique in the cytological diagnosis of vulval and anal disease.

Authors:  T S Levine; K J Rolfe; J Crow; S Styles; C W Perrett; A B Maclean; W M Reid
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  Custom made filter card for cytospin: A high fidelity economical alternative.

Authors:  Vani Krishnamurthy; Srinivasa Murthy Doreswamy
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.000

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  New Concept and Apparatus for Cytocentrifugation and Cell Processing for Microscopy Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Ligasová; Karel Koberna
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.