| Literature DB >> 27630772 |
Jonathan M Oliver1, Lee Stoner2, David S Rowlands2, Aaron R Caldwell1, Elizabeth Sanders1, Andreas Kreutzer1, Joel B Mitchell1, Martin Purpura3, Ralf Jäger3.
Abstract
Curcumin, a turmeric extract, may protect against cardiovascular diseases by enhancing endothelial function. In this randomized controlled double-blind parallel prospective study, fifty-nine healthy adults were assigned to placebo, 50 mg (50 mg), or 200 mg (200 mg) curcumin, for 8 weeks. The higher curcumin (200 mg) supplementation produced a dose-mediated improvement in endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). The outcome was a clinically substantial 3.0% increase (90% CI 0.7 to 5.3%, p = 0.032; benefit : harm odds ratio 546 : 1) with the 200 mg dose, relative to placebo. The 50 mg dose also increased FMD relative to placebo by 1.7% (-0.6 to 4.0%, p = 0.23; 25 : 1), but the outcome was not clinically decisive. In apparently healthy adults, 8 weeks of 200 mg oral curcumin supplementation resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in endothelial function as measured by FMD. Oral curcumin supplementation may present a simple lifestyle strategy for decreasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases. This trial was registered at ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN90184217).Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27630772 PMCID: PMC5005531 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1089653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Baseline demographics of the experimental cohort partitioned by treatment group.
| Parameter | Treatment group | Mean + SD |
|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | Placebo | 20.8 ± 1.8 |
| 50 mg | 21.2 ± 2.3 | |
| 200 mg | 21.7 ± 2.4 | |
|
| ||
| Stature (cm) | Placebo | 170.6 ± 8.2 |
| 50 mg | 173.7 ± 9.3 | |
| 200 mg | 169.2 ± 9.9 | |
|
| ||
| Weight (kg) | Placebo | 69.8 ± 11.3 |
| 50 mg | 73.2 ± 14.9 | |
| 200 mg | 66.9 ± 14.6 | |
|
| ||
| Body mass index (kg·m−2) | Placebo | 23.9 ± 2.6 |
| 50 mg | 24.1 ± 3.4 | |
| 200 mg | 23.1 ± 3.1 | |
|
| ||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Placebo | 116.9 ± 7.3 |
| 50 mg | 115.7 ± 7.5 | |
| 200 mg | 118.3 ± 6.0 | |
|
| ||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Placebo | 74.6 ± 6.6 |
| 50 mg | 71.4 ± 8.3 | |
| 200 mg | 77.8 ± 6.6 | |
|
| ||
| Resting HR (beats·min−1) | Placebo | 73.7 ± 8.4 |
| 50 mg | 74.8 ± 7.5 | |
| 200 mg | 74.9 ± 10.4 | |
|
| ||
| Maximal oxygen consumption (mL·kg·min−1) | Placebo | 41.6 ± 6.0 |
| 50 mg | 43.7 ± 7.1 | |
| 200 mg | 44.1 ± 7.6 | |
Sample size per group: PLA, 21; 50 mg, 19; 200 mg, 19.
Figure 1Effect of 56 day curcumin supplementation on flow-mediated dilation (%). Data are raw means and SD for the pre- (baseline) and posttesting time points. The magnitude threshold for the smallest change was 1%. The ∗∗ symbols indicate the likely substantial increase in the 200 mg dose, relative to placebo (Table 2).
A statistical summary of the effect of 56-day curcuminoid supplementation on flow mediated dilation (%).
| Contrast | Estimate | Confidence interval (90%) |
| Clinical inference statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper | Lower | Likelihood (%) | Qualitativec | Benefit oddsc | |||
| Time effecta | |||||||
| Placebo | −0.3 | 1.3 | −1.9 | 0.769 | |||
| 50 mg | 1.4 | 3.1 | −0.3 | 0.174 | |||
| 200 mg | 2.7 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.007 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Treatment | |||||||
| 50 mg-Placebo | 1.7 | 4.0 | −0.6 | 0.234 | 68.6/28.6/2.8 | ↑ possible | 25 : 1 |
| 200 mg-Placebo | 3.0 | 5.3 | 0.7 | 0.032 | 92.8/7.0/0.2 | ↑ likely | 546 : 1 |
| 200 mg-50 mg | 1.3 | 3.7 | −1.0 | 0.349 | 59.2/35.8/4.9 | ↑ possible | 12 : 1 |
aPost-pre intervention.
bFor example, 50 mg post-pre–200 mg post-pre.
cThe smallest worthwhile clinical change is 1%. The probability that a contrast was at least greater than the clinical threshold was 25–75% possible, 75–95% likely, 95–99.5% very likely, and >99.5% almost certain. The terms benefit, trivial, and harm also denoted by symbols ↑, ↔, and ↓, respectively, refer to the most likely directional outcome relative to the smallest effect threshold. Unclear refers to outcomes where the likelihood of both benefit and harm exceeded 5%. The clinical adoption threshold was expressed as a benefit: harm odds ratio >66 : 1.