Literature DB >> 27630425

Differences in gait velocity and trunk acceleration during semicircular turning gait with and without bag in females of very advanced age.

Sun-Shil Shin1, Won-Gyu Yoo2.   

Abstract

[Purpose] Gait velocity and trunk acceleration during semicircular turning gait with and without carrying a hand-held bag were compared in females of very advanced age.
[Subjects and Methods] Ten female volunteers of very advanced age who could walk independently were recruited for this study. Gait velocity and trunk acceleration were measured using an accelerometer during semicircular turning gait with and without carrying a hand-held bag.
[Results] Gait velocity during semicircular turning gait was greater with the bag than without the bag. [Conclusions] Trunk stability during semicircular turning gait was higher when the subjects carried a bag. Additional arm load could be considered during gait training in females of very advanced age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults of very advanced age; Stair negotiation; Trunk acceleration

Year:  2016        PMID: 27630425      PMCID: PMC5011589          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.2330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Cautious gait patterns, characterized by lower walking velocity, reduced stride length, and decreased arm swing, are a common behavior in older adults when facing serious balance threats such as when turning1). Humans generally swing their arms in opposition to their legs during walking, which increases gait velocity and facilitates balance of the angular momentum generated in the lower body1, 2). Thus, rhythmic arm swings play an important role for postural stability during walking2). However, little is known regarding the effect of arm movement during turning in females of very advanced age. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of carrying a bag on gait velocity and trunk acceleration during semicircular turning gait in females of very advanced age.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ten community-dwelling females of very advanced age (80.9 ± 5.5years [mean ± SD]) with a mean height of 149.4 ± 3.7 cm and a mean body weight of 50.8 ± 6.9 kg who could walk independently were recruited. All the participants were older than 75 years, could walk independently without any assistive device, and scored more than 24 in the Korean version of the mini-mental state examination. None of the participants had neurological diseases, major orthopedic diseases, or significant visual, auditory, or vestibular impairments. Ethics approval was obtained from the Inje University Ethics Committee for Human Investigations, and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Gait velocity and trunk acceleration during semicircular turning gait with and without a hand-held bag were measured with atri-axial accelerometer (dimensions: 35 × 35 × 13 mm; mass:13.7 g, Fit Dot Life, Suwon, KOR). The range of the sensors was selected to be ± 2 gin the acquisition software (Fitmeter manager 2, ver. 1.2.0.14, KOR). The walking velocity was calculated by dividing the distance by the time required to complete the locomotor task. Trunk acceleration in the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical directions was calculated using root mean squares of different directions3). The semicircular turning maneuver consisted of walking 3 m in a straight line, following a 2.36-m semicircular curve with a radius of 0.75 m, and walking 3 m back in a straight line. An accelerometer was fixed with double-sided adhesive tape over the L3 spinous process. The participants holding a bag (dimensions: 350 × 270 × 20 mm; mass: 0.2 kg) by the hand straps in the right hand were asked to walk along the above curve barefoot at a self-determined speed. The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package (version 18.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in gait velocity and trunk acceleration were analyzed using the paired t-test for comparisons between tasks. The significance level was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

There were no differences in directional trunk accelerations between the tasks (p>0.05).The anterior-posterior and medial-lateral acceleration amplitudes were 1033.5 ± 218.9 cm/s2 and 919.0 ± 205.5 cm/s2, respectively, without the bag and 952.6 ± 116.4 cm/s2 and 850.0 ± 201.8 cm/s2 with the bag. The gait velocity during semicircular turning gait with the bag (67.2 ± 13.6 cm/s) was significantly greater than that without the bag (59.0 ± 8.8 cm/s, p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate that the trunk control during semicircular turning gait was more stable with the bag than without the bag in females of very advanced age. Trunk control is important for stable walking in the elderly, and trunk and arm movements are coordinated with each other1). During semicircular turning, the outer leg produces greater plantar-flexor forces to propel the body forward because it must travel a greater distance. In addition, maintaining balance becomes more challenging when the center of mass moves in the medial-lateral direction during turning owing to the asymmetric movement of the inner and outer limbs4). However, in order to maintain the coordination between the movements of the upper and lower limbs, the arm swing on one side has to be limited while the arm swing amplitude on the opposite side has to be increased5). In addition, according to Nakakubo et al., intentionally increasing arm swing improves trunk stability in the medial-lateral direction and increases walking velocity in the elderly1). The results of the present study suggest that additional armload could be considered during gait training in females of very advanced age. The effects of various turning angles and load weights on trunk acceleration amplitude should be investigated in further studies.
  4 in total

1.  Does arm swing emphasized deliberately increase the trunk stability during walking in the elderly adults?

Authors:  Sho Nakakubo; Takehiko Doi; Ryuichi Sawa; Shogo Misu; Kota Tsutsumimoto; Rei Ono
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Arm constraint and walking in healthy adults.

Authors:  Matthew P Ford; Robert C Wagenaar; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effects of gait velocity and center of mass acceleration during turning gait in old-old elderly women.

Authors:  Sun-Shil Shin; Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.