Literature DB >> 27630035

Comparison of aesthetic facial criteria between Caucasian and East Asian female populations: An esthetic surgeon's perspective.

Y Gao1, J Niddam2, W Noel3, B Hersant3, J P Meningaud3.   

Abstract

Objective aesthetic criteria are important for patient evaluation and analysis during aesthetic surgeries, while successful aesthetic surgeries must take into account the underlying ethnic differences. The aim of this study is to help surgeons and scientists better plan facial aesthetic surgeries and understand the aesthetic needs according to different patients by reviewing and comparing the current aesthetic principles and preferences in Caucasian and East Asian populations. PubMed and The Cochrane Library were searched using keywords regarding anthropometric measurements. Only original clinical studies and reviews written in English and Chinese and those that focused on the objective assessment of facial aesthetics in Caucasian and East Asian female populations were retained for review. Reference lists of the selected articles were also reviewed for eligible studies. Sixty-five articles that described objective aesthetic criteria in Caucasian and East Asian female populations were found through PubMed, among which 47 included Caucasian populations and 18 included East Asian populations. Compared with White women, East Asian women prefer a small, delicate, and less robust face, lower position of double eyelid, more obtuse nasofrontal angle, rounder nose tip, smaller tip projection, and slightly more retruded mandibular profile. Various differences exist between objective facial aesthetic criteria in Caucasian and East Asian populations. Further studies that focus on the objective aesthetic criteria of facial attractiveness in different ethnicities need to be conducted, especially in Asian countries. Level V: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian people; aesthetic criteria; blepharoplasty; facial attractiveness; rhinoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27630035     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  12 in total

1.  The Relationship Between the Facial Proportion Changes in Hard Tissue and the Satisfaction of Patients After Reduction Malarplasty: a Research Based on Three-Dimensional Cephalometry.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Zuoliang Qi; Le Du; Guodong Song; Xianlei Zong; Xiaolei Jin
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  The Influence of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions on the Harmony of the Human Face Profile.

Authors:  Tatjana Perović
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-11-24

3.  Facial feminization.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

4.  Facial feminization - Surgical modification for Indian, European and African faces.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

5.  A Randomized, Active-Controlled, 52-Week Study of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Anteromedial Malar Region Augmentation.

Authors:  Chang-Hun Huh; Yunae Eom; So Dam Yang; Jung Won Shin; Kyle Koo-Il Seo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26

6.  Modification of the position of the angulus oris with a rotation flap and a YV flap in lip reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomoki Kiuchi; Masaki Yazawa; Takafumi Ohshiro; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-04-08

7.  Computer-Aided Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Study with the Establishment of Burstone Analysis-Derived 3D Norms.

Authors:  Cheng-Ting Ho; Rafael Denadai; Hsin-Chih Lai; Lun-Jou Lo; Hsiu-Hsia Lin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Skin coloration is a culturally-specific cue for attractiveness, healthiness, and youthfulness in observers of Chinese and western European descent.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Jie Yang; Kaida Xiao; Michael Pointer; Changjun Li; Sophie Wuerger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures.

Authors:  Jiayu Zhan; Meng Liu; Oliver G B Garrod; Christoph Daube; Robin A A Ince; Rachael E Jack; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Anthropometric study of the caucasian nose in the city of Curitiba: relevance of population evaluation.

Authors:  Annelyse Cristine Ballin; Bettina Carvalho; José Eduardo Lutaif Dolci; Renata Becker; Cezar Berger; Marcos Mocellin
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.