Literature DB >> 27629944

Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis and Stent Dysfunction after Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients with Malignant Biliary Stricture.

Shinichi Hashimoto1, Kei Ito, Shinsuke Koshida, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Kaori Masu, Yuji Iwashita, Jun Horaguchi, Go Kobayashi, Yutaka Noda.   

Abstract

Objective To retrospectively evaluate the risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and stent dysfunction after performing preoperative biliary drainage (BD) in patients with malignant biliary stricture. Methods Between January 2003 and February 2013, 105 consecutive patients who had undergone transpapillary BD before surgery were enrolled in this study. Procedure-related complications, stent dysfunction rates, and their respective risk factors were investigated. PEP was defined according to the consensus guidelines. Results Fifty-five patients had bile duct cancer, 31 had pancreatic cancer, 16 had ampullary cancer, and 3 had gallbladder cancer. Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and nasobiliary drainage (NBD) were performed in 84 patients and 21 patients, respectively. PEP occurred in 10% of the patients, with a significantly higher frequency in those with hilar/upper bile duct stricture (p=0.026) and a normal bilirubin level at admission (p=0.016). Of the 84 patients who underwent initial EBS, stent dysfunction occurred in 13%. The mean number of days from EBS to stent dysfunction was 14±12 days. A multivariate analysis revealed a male gender (p=0.048), a stent diameter ≤8 Fr (p=0.036), and an ERCP procedure time ≥45 minutes (p=0.021) to be risk factors for stent dysfunction. No NBD tube dysfunction was observed. Conclusion Patients with upper/hilar bile duct stricture or a normal bilirubin level are at high risk of developing PEP after preoperative BD. NBD or EBS with a large-bore stent is therefore recommended as preoperative BD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629944     DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


  5 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Linda Ann Hou; Jacques Van Dam
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20

2.  Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients Receiving Post-procedure Rectal Indomethacin.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Kang; Liyue Zheng; Wei Zeng; Shengye Yang; Hao Sun; Rongchun Zhang; Xiangping Wang; Biaoluo Wang; Qin Tao; Shaowei Yao; Jie Chen; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgical management of biliary malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Outcomes of preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Guo-Qiang Zhang; Yong Li; Yu-Ping Ren; Nan-Tao Fu; Hai-Bing Chen; Jun-Wu Yang; Wei-Dong Xiao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Internal drainage versus external drainage in palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Tian; Zixuan Zhang; Wen Li
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.