Literature DB >> 27629495

Specific Tips for General Controversies in Sacral Neuromodulation.

Ahmed S El-Azab1, Steven W Siegel2.   

Abstract

The field of Sacral Neuromodulation is continually evolving and still in its infancy. Common dilemmas experienced with this therapy will be discussed in this article, including ways to avoid and manage them. The focus will be on test evaluations performed with either peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) or staged procedure, the clinical effectiveness and safety of unilateral versus bilateral test stimulation for both the PNE and staged procedures, and best methods to determine the success of the trial phase. We will also discuss how to deal with the problem of declining efficacy of the device over time. The article presents a discussion on future technological innovations to enhance techniques and mode of positioning and use of leads, which along with a refined understanding of how neuromodulation is effective for different problems, will lead to better outcomes.

Keywords:  LUTS; PNE; Sacral Neuromodulation; Staged procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629495     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-016-0640-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  9 in total

1.  Sacral nerve stimulation results may be improved by electrodiagnostic techniques.

Authors:  J T Benson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Current opinion: complications and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Paul Pettit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Is sensory testing during lead placement crucial for achieving positive outcomes after sacral neuromodulation?

Authors:  Kenneth M Peters; Kim A Killinger; Judith A Boura
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Is the screening method of sacral neuromodulation a prognostic factor for long-term success?

Authors:  Tom Marcelissen; Randall Leong; Jan Serroyen; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Predictors of success for first stage neuromodulation: motor versus sensory response.

Authors:  Brian L Cohen; Hari S G R Tunuguntla; Angelo Gousse
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The use of bilateral sacral nerve stimulation in patients with loss of unilateral treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Tom A T Marcelissen; Randall K Leong; Jan Serroyen; Philip E V van Kerrebroeck; Stefan G G De Wachter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Neuromodulation and the role of electrodiagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Karen L Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Three-year Follow-up Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Study in Overactive Bladder Subjects Treated With Sacral Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Steven Siegel; Karen Noblett; Jeffrey Mangel; Tomas L Griebling; Suzette E Sutherland; Erin T Bird; Craig Comiter; Daniel Culkin; Jason Bennett; Samuel Zylstra; Fangyu Kan; Elizabeth Thiery
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Evaluation and management of malfunctioning sacral neuromodulator.

Authors:  Darlene M Gaynor-Krupnick; Neil T Dwyer; Helen Rittenmeyer; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.649

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.