Michael Fadell1, Angie Miller2, Laszlo Trefan3, Jason Weinman2, Jaime Stewart2, Kari Hayes2, Sabine Maguire4. 1. Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B125, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. michael.fadell@childrenscolorado.org. 2. Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B125, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 3. , 4th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF 144YS, UK. 4. Early Years Research Program, Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 4th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF 144YS, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Given the frequency of abusive fractures among infants, and the lack of research and or evidence for the phases of fracture healing seen in this age group, this study aims to describe a timetable of radiological features of fracture healing among infants in the first months of life. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cross-sectional time-series study of birth-related clavicle fractures from 2006-2013. A total of 108 digital images were available for review from 61 infants. The presence or absence of four features of healing including periosteal reaction, callus formation, bridging callus and remodelling were scored by three radiologists. RESULTS: The level of agreement between the radiologists was good to high (0.60-0.90). Features of healing were first seen at 7 days (periosteal reaction), 11 days (callus), 20 days (bridging) and 35 days (remodelling), respectively. The peak periods that each feature was present are as follows: periosteal reaction 11-42 days, callus 12-61 days, bridging 22-63 days and remodelling 49-59 days. CONCLUSIONS: Birth-associated clavicle fractures in infants follow a logical progression of healing changes. Understanding the expected progression and timing of fracture healing may be helpful as it pertains to the timing of injury in cases of abuse in infants. KEY POINTS: • Large study describing the time frames of fracture healing in young infants. • Features of fracture healing develop in a logical progression. • Evidence provided for determining fractures are consistent with a proposed time frame. • It is of critical importance to have sound evidence for the dating of fractures.
OBJECTIVES: Given the frequency of abusive fractures among infants, and the lack of research and or evidence for the phases of fracture healing seen in this age group, this study aims to describe a timetable of radiological features of fracture healing among infants in the first months of life. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cross-sectional time-series study of birth-related clavicle fractures from 2006-2013. A total of 108 digital images were available for review from 61 infants. The presence or absence of four features of healing including periosteal reaction, callus formation, bridging callus and remodelling were scored by three radiologists. RESULTS: The level of agreement between the radiologists was good to high (0.60-0.90). Features of healing were first seen at 7 days (periosteal reaction), 11 days (callus), 20 days (bridging) and 35 days (remodelling), respectively. The peak periods that each feature was present are as follows: periosteal reaction 11-42 days, callus 12-61 days, bridging 22-63 days and remodelling 49-59 days. CONCLUSIONS: Birth-associated clavicle fractures in infants follow a logical progression of healing changes. Understanding the expected progression and timing of fracture healing may be helpful as it pertains to the timing of injury in cases of abuse in infants. KEY POINTS: • Large study describing the time frames of fracture healing in young infants. • Features of fracture healing develop in a logical progression. • Evidence provided for determining fractures are consistent with a proposed time frame. • It is of critical importance to have sound evidence for the dating of fractures.