AIM: The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on a chest X-ray is an indicator of cardiac enlargement, although its predictive power for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in chronic kidney disease is unknown. We examined it in a cohort of hemodialysis patients, as compared with an N-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). METHOD: This was an observational study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses including 517 maintenance hemodialysis patients and 122 healthy control subjects. The main predictors were CTR and serum NT-proBNP, and the main outcome was CVD events in 5 years. RESULTS: At baseline, the hemodialysis patients had higher median (interquartile range) levels of CTR [0.487 (0.457-0.520)] than the control group [0.458 (0.432-0.497)]. In the hemodialysis group, CTR was positively correlated with NT-proBNP (Spearman's r=0.44, P＜0.001). During follow-up, 190 CVD events occurred. CTR was significantly associated with the risk of CVD [HR 2.12 (95% CI, 1.38-3.25) for the fourth quartile as compared with the second quartile of CTR] in a multivariate Cox model. In the same model, NT-proBNP (fourth versus first quartile) showed a HR of 3.27 (2.02-5.31). When CTR and NT-proBNP were simultaneously included as predictors, only NT-proBNP remained a significant predictor of CVD events, all-cause mortality and composite of CVD plus all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that CTR was a significant and independent predictor of CVD in hemodialysis patients. CTR can be used for CVD risk stratification in hemodialysis patients when NT-proBNP is not available.
AIM: The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on a chest X-ray is an indicator of cardiac enlargement, although its predictive power for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in chronic kidney disease is unknown. We examined it in a cohort of hemodialysis patients, as compared with an N-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). METHOD: This was an observational study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses including 517 maintenance hemodialysis patients and 122 healthy control subjects. The main predictors were CTR and serum NT-proBNP, and the main outcome was CVD events in 5 years. RESULTS: At baseline, the hemodialysis patients had higher median (interquartile range) levels of CTR [0.487 (0.457-0.520)] than the control group [0.458 (0.432-0.497)]. In the hemodialysis group, CTR was positively correlated with NT-proBNP (Spearman's r=0.44, P＜0.001). During follow-up, 190 CVD events occurred. CTR was significantly associated with the risk of CVD [HR 2.12 (95% CI, 1.38-3.25) for the fourth quartile as compared with the second quartile of CTR] in a multivariate Cox model. In the same model, NT-proBNP (fourth versus first quartile) showed a HR of 3.27 (2.02-5.31). When CTR and NT-proBNP were simultaneously included as predictors, only NT-proBNP remained a significant predictor of CVD events, all-cause mortality and composite of CVD plus all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that CTR was a significant and independent predictor of CVD in hemodialysis patients. CTR can be used for CVD risk stratification in hemodialysis patients when NT-proBNP is not available.
Authors: Suellen M Curkendall; Stephan Lanes; Cynthia de Luise; Mary Rose Stang; Judith K Jones; Dewei She; Earl Goehring Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Mark J Sarnak; Andrew S Levey; Anton C Schoolwerth; Josef Coresh; Bruce Culleton; L Lee Hamm; Peter A McCullough; Bertram L Kasiske; Ellie Kelepouris; Michael J Klag; Patrick Parfrey; Marc Pfeffer; Leopoldo Raij; David J Spinosa; Peter W Wilson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-28 Impact factor: 29.690