Literature DB >> 27629239

Urolithiasis Treatment in Australia: The Age of Ureteroscopic Intervention.

Marlon Perera1, Nathan Papa1, Ned Kinnear1, David Wetherell1, Nathan Lawrentschuk1,2,3, David Webb1, Damien Bolton1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of urolithiasis is increasing in the Western population. Significant advances in ureteroscopy and stone fragmentation energy sources have resulted in a paradigm shift in urolithiasis management. We aimed to assess the current state of urolithiasis management in Australia over the last 15 years using population-based data.
METHODS: Medicare Australia databases were accessed and Medicare rebate codes pertaining to ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were extracted per state, year, and gender between 2001 and 2015. Population data were extracted from the Australian Bureau of Statistics website and provided the "population at risk" denominator to calculate incidence proportions.
RESULTS: From January 2001 to December 2015, 114,789 ureteroscopy or pyeloscopy procedures for stone extraction in adult patients were performed in Australia. During the same period, 48,209 SWL and 6956 PCNL procedures were performed. Ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy procedures have been increasing by an average of 9.3% year-on-year, population adjusted, while SWL has decreased by 3.5% and PCNL by 6.4% every year over the same period. In absolute terms, scope procedures have increased yearly by an average of 3.9 per 100,000 of population (confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.2, 4.5), while SWL has changed by -0.77 (95% CI: -0.88, -0.65) and PCNL by -0.16 (95% CI: -0.17, -0.14).
CONCLUSION: Over the past 15 years in Australia, the total number of stone treatment procedures has increased significantly. Considerable increases in ureteroscopy were observed with relative and absolute reductions in SWL and PCNL. Regional variations in urolithiasis management strategies highlight the need for consensus on stone treatments within Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; nephrolithiasis; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; renal stone; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629239     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  Which has more complications?-Shockwave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment of renal calculi with 1-year follow-up in an Australian population.

Authors:  Matthew Farag; Gregory S Jack; Nathan Papa; Lih-Ming Wong; Damien M Bolton; Daniel Lenaghan
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-07-01

2.  Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile.

Authors:  N F Davis; M R Quinlan; C Poyet; N Lawrentschuk; D M Bolton; D Webb; G S Jack
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  What a mesh! An Australian experience using national female continence surgery trends over 20 years.

Authors:  Aoife McVey; Liang G Qu; Garson Chan; Marlon Perera; Janelle Brennan; Eric Chung; Johan Gani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: A systematic review.

Authors:  Wenying Wang; Jingyuan Fan; Guifeng Huang; Jun Li; Xi Zhu; Ye Tian; Li Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy improves stone-free rates for impacted proximal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zi-Ming Gao; Shan Gao; Hong-Chen Qu; Kai Li; Ning Li; Chun-Lai Liu; Xing-Wang Zhu; Yi-Li Liu; Ping Wang; Xiao-Hua Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What is the best way to manage ureteric calculi in the time of COVID-19? A comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in an Australian health-care setting.

Authors:  Matthew Farag; Gregory S Jack; Lih-Ming Wong; Damien M Bolton; Daniel Lenaghan
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-11-07

7.  Mineral content variations between Australian tap and bottled water in the context of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Michael Kwok; Stephen McGeorge; Matthew Roberts; Bhaskar Somani; Nicholas Rukin
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Contributions to expenditure in endoscopic stone management: a costly process.

Authors:  Romy Mondschein; Damien Bolton; Sarah Tan; Minh Hang Vu; Philip McCahy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.861

9.  Unplanned 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing endo-urological surgeries for upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Siddharth Pandey; Ajay Aggarwal; Deepanshu Sharma; Gaurav Garg; Samarth Agarwal; Ashish Sharma; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-08-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.