Literature DB >> 27629031

Muscle-spring dynamics in time-limited, elastic movements.

M V Rosario1, G P Sutton2, S N Patek3, G S Sawicki4.   

Abstract

Muscle contractions that load in-series springs with slow speed over a long duration do maximal work and store the most elastic energy. However, time constraints, such as those experienced during escape and predation behaviours, may prevent animals from achieving maximal force capacity from their muscles during spring-loading. Here, we ask whether animals that have limited time for elastic energy storage operate with springs that are tuned to submaximal force production. To answer this question, we used a dynamic model of a muscle-spring system undergoing a fixed-end contraction, with parameters from a time-limited spring-loader (bullfrog: Lithobates catesbeiana) and a non-time-limited spring-loader (grasshopper: Schistocerca gregaria). We found that when muscles have less time to contract, stored elastic energy is maximized with lower spring stiffness (quantified as spring constant). The spring stiffness measured in bullfrog tendons permitted less elastic energy storage than was predicted by a modelled, maximal muscle contraction. However, when muscle contractions were modelled using biologically relevant loading times for bullfrog jumps (50 ms), tendon stiffness actually maximized elastic energy storage. In contrast, grasshoppers, which are not time limited, exhibited spring stiffness that maximized elastic energy storage when modelled with a maximal muscle contraction. These findings demonstrate the significance of evolutionary variation in tendon and apodeme properties to realistic jumping contexts as well as the importance of considering the effect of muscle dynamics and behavioural constraints on energy storage in muscle-spring systems.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  elastic energy storage; fixed-end contraction; muscle dynamics; muscle–spring interaction; spring stiffness; time-limited loading

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629031      PMCID: PMC5031668          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Jumping and kicking in bush crickets.

Authors:  Malcolm Burrows; Oliver Morris
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Gearing for speed slows the predatory strike of a mantis shrimp.

Authors:  Matthew J McHenry; Thomas Claverie; Michael V Rosario; S N Patek
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Neural control and coordination of jumping in froghopper insects.

Authors:  Malcolm Burrows
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Elastic recoil can either amplify or attenuate muscle-tendon power, depending on inertial vs. fluid dynamic loading.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The pattern of stimulation influences the amount of oscillatory work done by frog muscle.

Authors:  E D Stevens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The mechanics of elastic loading and recoil in anuran jumping.

Authors:  Henry C Astley; Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Levers and linkages: mechanical trade-offs in a power-amplified system.

Authors:  Philip S L Anderson; Thomas Claverie; S N Patek
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants.

Authors:  S N Patek; J E Baio; B L Fisher; A V Suarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Work and power output in the hindlimb muscles of Cuban tree frogs Osteopilus septentrionalis during jumping.

Authors:  M M Peplowski; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Evidence for an elastic projection mechanism in the chameleon tongue.

Authors:  Jurriaan H de Groot; Johan L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  7 in total

1.  Some Challenges of Playing with Power: Does Complex Energy Flow Constrain Neuromuscular Performance?

Authors:  Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 2.  Yank: the time derivative of force is an important biomechanical variable in sensorimotor systems.

Authors:  David C Lin; Craig P McGowan; Kyle P Blum; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A Tunable, Simplified Model for Biological Latch Mediated Spring Actuated Systems.

Authors:  Andrés Cook; Kaanthi Pandhigunta; Mason A Acevedo; Adam Walker; Rosalie L Didcock; Jackson T Castro; Declan O'Neill; Raghav Acharya; M Saad Bhamla; Philip S L Anderson; Mark Ilton
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  A physical model of mantis shrimp for exploring the dynamics of ultrafast systems.

Authors:  Emma Steinhardt; Nak-Seung P Hyun; Je-Sung Koh; Gregory Freeburn; Michelle H Rosen; Fatma Zeynep Temel; S N Patek; Robert J Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Why do Large Animals Never Actuate Their Jumps with Latch-Mediated Springs? Because They can Jump Higher Without Them.

Authors:  Gregory P Sutton; Elizabeth Mendoza; Emanuel Azizi; Sarah J Longo; Jeffrey P Olberding; Mark Ilton; Sheila N Patek
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Power Amplification for Jumping Soft Robots Actuated by Artificial Muscles.

Authors:  Adriane Fernandes Minori; Saurabh Jadhav; Haojin Chen; Samantha Fong; Michael T Tolley
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-03-03

7.  Enhancement of muscle and locomotor performance by a series compliance: A mechanistic simulation study.

Authors:  Jason W Robertson; Colin N Struthers; Douglas A Syme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.