Literature DB >> 27628617

Prospective Investigation of a Novel Ultrasound-assisted Lumbar Puncture Technique on Infants in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Michael Gorn1, Sergey Kunkov1,2, Ellen F Crain1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe a novel ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture (UALP) technique and to compare it to standard lumbar puncture (SLP) technique in infants.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled study in infants 60 days old and younger undergoing a lumbar puncture (LP) in a pediatric emergency department. Patients with a spinal anomaly or ventriculoperitoneal shunt were excluded. Eligible infants were randomized to UALP or SLP. A spinal sonogram was performed on all patients by an investigator not involved in performing the LP. Spinal landmarks and maximum safe depth were identified for the UALP providers. Providers in the SLP group were blinded to sonographic measurements. A successful LP was defined as the collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with a red blood cell count of less than 10,000 cells/mm3 . Statistical analysis included chi-square, Mann-Whitney U-test, and number needed to treat (NNT).
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled, 21 in the UALP group and 22 in the SLP group. Prematurity, weight, length, provider experience, anesthesia use, stylet technique, and number of attempts were similar between groups. The median age in the UALP group was 38 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 33 days) versus 45 days (IQR = 19 days) in the SLP group (p = 0.02). CSF was obtained in all UALP subjects (100%) versus in 18 of 22 (82%) in the SLP group (p = 0.04); 20 (95%) UALP subjects versus 15 (68%) SLP subjects met our definition of success (p = 0.023). The odds ratio of successful LP using UALP technique was 9.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.034 to 84.026) and the NNT was 3.7 (95% CI = 2.02 to 24.18).
CONCLUSION: The UALP technique increases the rate of a successful LP in infants compared to standard technique.
© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27628617     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

1.  Preprocedural Ultrasound for Infant Lumbar Puncture: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Kessler; Vartan Pahalyants; Joshua Kriger; Gerald Behr; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  The Variability of Preferred Infant Lumbar Puncture Insertion Site Between Novice and Experienced Physicians.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Neal; Jason A Levy; Rachel G Rempell; Rebecca L Vieira
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-09-12

3.  Spinal ultrasound for lumbar puncture in infants: To see or not to see.

Authors:  Ramón Eizaga Rebollar; Patricia Martín Falcón; Beatriz Gómez Tapia; Luis Miguel Torres Morera
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Ultrasound imaging versus palpation method for diagnostic lumbar puncture in neonates and infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abiola Olowoyeye; Opeyemi Fadahunsi; Jerome Okudo; Oluwakare Opaneye; Charles Okwundu
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2019-03-15

5.  Study protocol: NeoCLEAR: Neonatal Champagne Lumbar punctures Every time - An RCT: a multicentre, randomised controlled 2 × 2 factorial trial to investigate techniques to increase lumbar puncture success.

Authors:  Andrew S J Marshall; Manish Sadarangani; Alexandra Scrivens; Rachel Williams; Jean Yong; Ursula Bowler; Louise Linsell; Virginia Chiocchia; Jennifer L Bell; Caz Stokes; Patricia Santhanadass; Eleri Adams; Edmund Juszczak; Charles C Roehr
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.