AIMS: To evaluate the effect of lansoprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, on the absorption, pharmacokinetics, and safety of neratinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Fifteen healthy adult subjects received a single oral dose of neratinib 240 mg (Period 1), followed by a washout period, then oral lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 7 days and a single dose of neratinib 240 mg on Day 5 (Period 2). Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 72 h following each neratinib dose. Plasma neratinib concentration-time data were analysed using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t , AUC0-inf , and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) for neratinib plus lansoprazole vs. neratinib were used to assess the magnitude of the drug-drug interaction if the 90% confidence intervals were outside 80.00-125.00%. RESULTS: Neratinib geometric least-squares mean (LSM) Cmax was reduced from 84.5 ng ml-1 with neratinib alone to 24.5 ng ml-1 with neratinib plus lansoprazole. The extent of exposure to neratinib was also decreased: geometric LSM AUC0-t was 1478 ng ml-1 h with neratinib vs. 426 ng ml-1 h with neratinib plus lansoprazole, and geometric LSM AUC0-inf was 1557 ng ml-1 h vs. 542 ng ml-1 h, respectively. Mean t½ was similar with both treatments (approximately 14 h). Geometric mean ratios 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t , AUC0-inf and Cmax fell outside the prespecified equivalence range (80.0-125.0%). Treatment-emergent adverse events, all mild, were reported by five (33%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of lansoprazole with neratinib reduced the rate and extent of neratinib exposure in healthy subjects.
AIMS: To evaluate the effect of lansoprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, on the absorption, pharmacokinetics, and safety of neratinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Fifteen healthy adult subjects received a single oral dose of neratinib 240 mg (Period 1), followed by a washout period, then oral lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 7 days and a single dose of neratinib 240 mg on Day 5 (Period 2). Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 72 h following each neratinib dose. Plasma neratinib concentration-time data were analysed using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t , AUC0-inf , and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) for neratinib plus lansoprazole vs. neratinib were used to assess the magnitude of the drug-drug interaction if the 90% confidence intervals were outside 80.00-125.00%. RESULTS:Neratinib geometric least-squares mean (LSM) Cmax was reduced from 84.5 ng ml-1 with neratinib alone to 24.5 ng ml-1 with neratinib plus lansoprazole. The extent of exposure to neratinib was also decreased: geometric LSM AUC0-t was 1478 ng ml-1 h with neratinib vs. 426 ng ml-1 h with neratinib plus lansoprazole, and geometric LSM AUC0-inf was 1557 ng ml-1 h vs. 542 ng ml-1 h, respectively. Mean t½ was similar with both treatments (approximately 14 h). Geometric mean ratios 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t , AUC0-inf and Cmax fell outside the prespecified equivalence range (80.0-125.0%). Treatment-emergent adverse events, all mild, were reported by five (33%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of lansoprazole with neratinib reduced the rate and extent of neratinib exposure in healthy subjects.
Authors: Arlene Chan; Suzette Delaloge; Frankie A Holmes; Beverly Moy; Hiroji Iwata; Vernon J Harvey; Nicholas J Robert; Tajana Silovski; Erhan Gokmen; Gunter von Minckwitz; Bent Ejlertsen; Stephen K L Chia; Janine Mansi; Carlos H Barrios; Michael Gnant; Marc Buyse; Ira Gore; John Smith; Graydon Harker; Norikazu Masuda; Katarina Petrakova; Angel Guerrero Zotano; Nicholas Iannotti; Gladys Rodriguez; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Alvin Wong; Richard Bryce; Yining Ye; Bin Yao; Miguel Martin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Kevin M Koch; Young-Hyuck Im; Sung-Bae Kim; Ander Urruticoechea Ribate; Joe Stephenson; Jeffrey Botbyl; Leanne Cartee; Jane Holshouser; Derry Ridgway Journal: Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Date: 2013-07-10
Authors: Sridhar K Rabindran; Carolyn M Discafani; Edward C Rosfjord; Michelle Baxter; M Brawner Floyd; Jonathan Golas; William A Hallett; Bernard D Johnson; Ramaswamy Nilakantan; Elsebe Overbeek; Marvin F Reich; Ru Shen; Xiaoqing Shi; Hwei-Ru Tsou; Yu-Fen Wang; Allan Wissner Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christopher Southan; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Michael Spedding; William A Catterall; Doriano Fabbro; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ahmad Awada; Ramon Colomer; Kenichi Inoue; Igor Bondarenko; Rajendra A Badwe; Georgia Demetriou; Soo-Chin Lee; Ajay O Mehta; Sung-Bae Kim; Thomas Bachelot; Chanchal Goswami; Suryanarayan Deo; Ron Bose; Alvin Wong; Feng Xu; Bin Yao; Richard Bryce; Lisa A Carey Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Colin P Tang; Owen Clark; John R Ferrarone; Carl Campos; Alshad S Lalani; John D Chodera; Andrew M Intlekofer; Olivier Elemento; Ingo K Mellinghoff Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 16.174
Authors: Ana Ruiz-Garcia; Weiwei Tan; Jerry Li; May Haughey; Joanna Masters; Jennifer Hibma; Swan Lin Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Karim Aljakouch; Tatjana Lechtonen; Hesham K Yosef; Mohamad K Hammoud; Wissam Alsaidi; Carsten Kötting; Carolin Mügge; Robert Kourist; Samir F El-Mashtoly; Klaus Gerwert Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 15.336