Literature DB >> 27628252

Assessment study of insight ARTHRO VR (®) arthroscopy virtual training simulator: face, content, and construct validities.

Sofía Bayona1, José Manuel Fernández-Arroyo2, Isaac Martín3, Pilar Bayona4.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to test the face, content, and construct validities of a virtual-reality haptic arthroscopy simulator and to validate four assessment hypothesis. The participants in our study were 94 arthroscopists attending an international conference on arthroscopy. The interviewed surgeons had been performing arthroscopies for a mean of 8.71 years (σ = 6.94 years). We explained the operation, functionality, instructions for use, and the exercises provided by the simulator. They performed a trial exercise and then an exercise in which performance was recorded. After having using it, the arthroscopists answered a questionnaire. The simulator was classified as one of the best training methods (over phantoms), and obtained a mark of 7.10 out of 10 as an evaluation tool. The simulator was considered more useful for inexperienced surgeons than for surgeons with experience (mean difference 1.88 out of 10, P value < 0.001). The participants valued the simulator at 8.24 as a tool for learning skills, its fidelity at 7.41, the quality of the platform at 7.54, and the content of the exercises at 7.09. It obtained a global score of 7.82. Of the subjects, 30.8% said they would practise with the simulator more than 6 h per week. Of the surgeons, 89.4% affirmed that they would recommend the simulator to their colleagues. The data gathered support the first three hypotheses, as well as face and content validities. Results show statistically significant differences between experts and novices, thus supporting the construct validity, but studies with a larger sample must be carried out to verify this. We propose concrete solutions and an equation to calculate economy of movement. Analogously, we analyze competence measurements and propose an equation to provide a single measurement that contains them all and that, according to the surgeons' criteria, is as reliable as the judgment of experts observing the performance of an apprentice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Assessment study; Construct validity; Content validity; Face validity; Virtual-reality simulator

Year:  2008        PMID: 27628252     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-008-0101-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  2 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  Syed Haque; Shankar Srinivasan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-01

Review 2.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

  2 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future.

Authors:  M C Obdeijn; N Bavinck; C Mathoulin; C M A M van der Horst; M P Schijven; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Validation of the ArthroS virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  J J Stunt; G M M J Kerkhoffs; C N van Dijk; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Validation of a virtual reality-based simulator for shoulder arthroscopy.

Authors:  Stefan Rahm; Marco Germann; Andreas Hingsammer; Karl Wieser; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Evaluation of a virtual-reality-based simulator using passive haptic feedback for knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Sandro F Fucentese; Stefan Rahm; Karl Wieser; Jonas Spillmann; Matthias Harders; Peter P Koch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Validity of a Novel Digitally Enhanced Skills Training Station for Freehand Distal Interlocking.

Authors:  Torsten Pastor; Tatjana Pastor; Philipp Kastner; Firas Souleiman; Matthias Knobe; Boyko Gueorguiev; Markus Windolf; Jan Buschbaum
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.