| Literature DB >> 27627855 |
B A Gray1, S Middey1, G Conti2,3, A X Gray4, C-T Kuo2,3, A M Kaiser5, S Ueda6, K Kobayashi6, D Meyers1, M Kareev1, I C Tung7,8, Jian Liu9, C S Fadley2,3, J Chakhalian1,10, J W Freeland7.
Abstract
The superconductor-to-insulator transition (SIT) induced by means such as external magnetic fields, disorder or spatial confinement is a vivid illustration of a quantum phase transition dramatically affecting the superconducting order parameter. In pursuit of a new realization of the SIT by interfacial charge transfer, we developed extremely thin superlattices composed of high Tc superconductor YBa2Cu3O7 (YBCO) and colossal magnetoresistance ferromagnet La0.67Ca0.33MnO3 (LCMO). By using linearly polarized resonant X-ray absorption spectroscopy and magnetic circular dichroism, combined with hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we derived a complete picture of the interfacial carrier doping in cuprate and manganite atomic layers, leading to the transition from superconducting to an unusual Mott insulating state emerging with the increase of LCMO layer thickness. In addition, contrary to the common perception that only transition metal ions may respond to the charge transfer process, we found that charge is also actively compensated by rare-earth and alkaline-earth metal ions of the interface. Such deterministic control of Tc by pure electronic doping without any hindering effects of chemical substitution is another promising route to disentangle the role of disorder on the pseudo-gap and charge density wave phases of underdoped cuprates.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27627855 PMCID: PMC5024130 DOI: 10.1038/srep33184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Crystal structure and electrical transport.
(a) XRD scan for Y2/L1 sample showing clear thickness fringes and superlattice (SL) peaks. (b) The lattice structure consistent with the diffraction data of panel (a). (c) Electrical transport measurements showing a clear superconductor to insulator transition as a function of LCMO layer thickness. Inset shows growth sequence for Y2/L1 sample.
Figure 2Heterostructuring effect on manganite layers.
(a) Mn L3-edge x-ray absorption spectroscopy demonstrating that for up to 3 unit cells of LCMO, the Mn valence is fixed close to 4+ rather than the expected 3.33+. For comparison, we show data from a thicker LCMO/YBCO superlattice (Y9/L25) with a nominal Mn valence of 3.33+. (b) HXPS spectra of Mn 2p3/2, demonstrating that in Y9/L25 and bulk LCMO, Mn has nominal valence of 3.33+, whereas Mn in the Y2/L1 SL has nominal valence of 4+.
Figure 3Heterostructuring effect on cuprate layers.
(a) Cu L-edge XAS showing the trend in the electronic structure and orbital differences with LCMO layer thickness. While all show the strong polarization dependence expected for a pure state, there is a clear drop in the state. (b) HXPS spectra of Cu 2p3/2 of the Y2/L1, Y9/L25 and YBCO bulk samples, where the well screened peak of Cu 2p3/2 is observed at binding energy 932 eV and corresponds to the final state . The satellite peaks at binding energy 940–944 eV correspond to the 3d9 poorly screened final states.
Figure 4Responses of rare-earth and alkaline earth metal elements.
Hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the core levels of the Y2/L1 sample: (a) Ba 3 (b) Y 3d (c) Ca 2p3/2 and (d) La 3d5/2. All of these data were recorded at T = 300 K and the energy was calibrated using Au.
Figure 5Phase diagram.
(a) XMCD of Cu L3,2 edges for Y2/LN SLs. (b) Doping level inferred from both T and the XAS analysis of Y2/LN SLs are overlayed with the bulk phase diagram for YBCO, adapted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: [Nature Communications] (63), copyright (2014). PG = pseudogap, FL = Fermi liquid. Superconducting T is defined as the midpoint of the transition and the width of transition has been marked as the corresponding error bar.