| Literature DB >> 27627851 |
Qian Lei1, Meijia Zhang1, Liguo Shen1, Renjie Li1, Bao-Qiang Liao2, Hongjun Lin1.
Abstract
This study linked the chemical potential change to high specific filtration resistance (SFR) of gel layer, and then proposed a novel membrane fouling mechanism regarding gel layer filtration, namely, Flory-Huggins based filtration mechanism. A mathematical model for this mechanism was theoretically deduced. Agar was used as a model polymer for gel formation. Simulation of the mathematical model for agar gel showed that volume fraction of polymer and Flory-Huggins interaction parameter were the two key factors governing the gel SFR, whereas, pH and ionic strength were not related with the gel SFR. Filtration tests of gel layer showed that the total SFR value, effects of pH and ionic strength on the gel SFR well agreed with the perditions of model's simulation, indicating the real occurrence of this mechanism and the feasibility of the proposed model. This mechanism can satisfactorily explain the extremely high SFR of gel layer, and improve fundamental insights into membrane fouling regarding gel layer filtration.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27627851 PMCID: PMC5024131 DOI: 10.1038/srep33343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of (a) 3D structure of gel layer, (b) lattice of cross section of gel layer.
Parameter values in the gel layer filtration process for simulation.
| Parameter | Value for simulation | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| R | 8.314 | kg·m2·s−2·mol−1·K−1 |
| T | 298 | K |
| VB | 1.8 × 10−5 | m3·mol−1 |
| σ | 1.0 × 10−3 | kg·m−1·s−1 |
| J | 2.35 × 10−5 | m3·m−2·s−1 |
| 0.10 | — | |
| 0.40 | — | |
| mg | 1.5 × 10−6 | kg |
Figure 2Variation of the Flory-Huggins based SFR of gel layer with volume fraction of agar in gel (Flory-Huggins interaction parameter χ = 0.40, agar dry weight mg = 1.5 × 10−6 kg).
Figure 3Variation of the Flory-Huggins based SFR of gel layer with Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (volume fraction φ2 = 0.10, agar dry weight mg = 1.5 × 10−6 kg).
SFR of gel layer under different pH and ionic strength of solution.
| conditions | number of measurements | SFR of gel (1018 m·kg−1) | significance difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| condition 1# pH = 3.0 | 4 | 5.46 ± 0.49 | No (Sig12 = 0.476)No (Sig13 = 0.663)No (Sig14 = 0.792)No (Sig23 = 0.826)No (Sig24 = 0.358)No (Sig34 = 0.635) |
| condition 2# pH = 5.0 | 4 | 5.41 ± 0.76 | |
| condition 3# pH = 7.0 | 4 | 5.68 ± 0.43 | |
| condition 4# pH = 9.0 | 4 | 5.54 ± 0.27 | |
| condition 1# ionic strength = 0 mol·L−1 | 4 | 5.74 ± 0.31 | No (Sig12 = 0.244) |
| condition 2# ionic strength = 0.035 mol·L−1 | 4 | 5.49 ± 0.22 |
aSig. value shown in parentheses, and subscript “mn” means comparing condition m# and condition n#.
Figure 4Variation of lost water content of an agar gel with heating duration (agar gel concentration = 3 g·L−1, oven temperature = 35 °C).
Figure 5Variation of residual weight of gels with temperature in TGA analysis.