Literature DB >> 27627793

Small for Gestational Age: The Differential Mortality When Detected versus Undetected Antenatally.

Jacob C Larkin1, Suneet P Chauhan2, Hyagriv N Simhan1.   

Abstract

Background Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) prompts antepartum surveillance to reduce perinatal mortality, yet most cases of FGR are undetected. Objective This study aims to compare rates of adverse neonatal outcomes when FGR is detected versus undetected. Study Design Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns (birth weight < 10% for gestational age) delivered at the Magee-Women's Hospital in Pittsburgh, PA from 2003 to 2010 were divided into three groups: those whom did not undergo third-trimester fetal growth ultrasound (SGA-no US), were appropriate for gestational age (AGA) by ultrasound (SGA-undetected), or were FGR by ultrasound (SGA-detected). We then compared rates of 5-minute Apgar < 4 and neonatal death (ND), with AGA newborns as the referent. Results Out of 29,885 neonates, 2,475 (8.3%) were SGA. Out of the 826 (33%) SGA neonates who underwent growth ultrasound, 185 (22%) were considered FGR. In the SGA-no US group, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for Apgar < 4 was 2.84 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-6.29) and 3.87 (95% CI: 2.09-7.18) for ND. The risk of Apgar < 4 (aOR: 3.10, 95% CI: 0.93-10.28) and ND (aOR: 2.16, 95% CI: 0.66-7.14) were not significantly elevated for SGA-undetected neonates, while SGA-detected neonates were most at risk, with an aOR of 18.20 (95% CI: 6.82-48.60) for Apgar < 4 and 18.24 (95% CI: 7.90-42.13) for ND. Conclusion Fetal growth ultrasound effectively stratifies risk amongst SGA neonates. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27627793     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  4 in total

1.  Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Fetal Growth Restriction and Small for Gestational Age.

Authors:  Chiara Lubrano; Emanuela Taricco; Chiara Coco; Fiorenza Di Domenico; Chiara Mandò; Irene Cetin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Combination of Fundal Height and Ultrasound to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Birth.

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz; Ana M Ortega-Villa; Sarah J Pugh; Alaina Bever; William Grobman; Roger B Newman; John Owen; Deborah A Wing; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Anna Kajdy; Jan Modzelewski; Monika Jakubiak; Artur Pokropek; Michał Rabijewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.