Literature DB >> 27626790

Evaluation of Generalized Born Models for Large Scale Affinity Prediction of Cyclodextrin Host-Guest Complexes.

Haiyang Zhang1, Chunhua Yin1, Hai Yan1, David van der Spoel2.   

Abstract

Binding affinity prediction with implicit solvent models remains a challenge in virtual screening for drug discovery. In order to assess the predictive power of implicit solvent models in docking techniques with Amber scoring, three generalized Born models (GBHCT, GBOBCI, and GBOBCII) available in Dock 6.7 were utilized, for determining the binding affinity of a large set of β-cyclodextrin complexes with 75 neutral guest molecules. The results were compared to potential of mean force (PMF) free energy calculations with four GB models (GBStill, GBHCT, GBOBCI, and GBOBCII) and to experimental data. Docking results yield similar accuracy to the computationally demanding PMF method with umbrella sampling. Neither docking nor PMF calculations reproduce the experimental binding affinities, however, as indicated by a small Spearman rank order coefficient (∼0.5). The binding energies obtained from GB models were decomposed further into individual contributions of the binding partners and solvent environments and compared to explicit solvent simulations for five complexes allowing for rationalizing the difference between explicit and implicit solvent models. An important observation is that the explicit solvent screens the interaction between host and guest much stronger than GB models. In contrast, the screening in GB models is too strong in solutes, leading to overestimation of short-range interactions and too strong binding. It is difficult to envision a way of overcoming these two opposite effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27626790     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  6 in total

1.  Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics Calculations Using Chemical Host and Guest: A Comprehensive Picture of Molecular Recognition.

Authors:  Zhiye Tang; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Role of Displacing Confined Solvent in the Conformational Equilibrium of β-Cyclodextrin.

Authors:  Peng He; Sheila Sarkar; Emilio Gallicchio; Tom Kurtzman; Lauren Wickstrom
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Evaluating Force Field Performance in Thermodynamic Calculations of Cyclodextrin Host-Guest Binding: Water Models, Partial Charges, and Host Force Field Parameters.

Authors:  Niel M Henriksen; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Computational Investigation of Structural Basis for Enhanced Binding of Isoflavone Analogues with Mitochondrial Aldehyde Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Yongguang Zhang; Yejie Qiu; Haiyang Zhang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-02-22

5.  Comparative Interaction Studies of Quercetin with 2-Hydroxyl-propyl-β-cyclodextrin and 2,6-Methylated-β-cyclodextrin.

Authors:  Vasiliki Vakali; Michail Papadourakis; Nikitas Georgiou; Nikoletta Zoupanou; Dimitrios A Diamantis; Uroš Javornik; Paraskevi Papakyriakopoulou; Janez Plavec; Georgia Valsami; Andreas G Tzakos; Demeter Tzeli; Zoe Cournia; Thomas Mauromoustakos
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Optimization of Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Interactions Using an Alchemical Free-Energy Method.

Authors:  Alexander D Wade; David J Huggins
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 6.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.