| Literature DB >> 27626688 |
Gaochao Dong1, Qiang Chen2,3, Feng Jiang1, Decai Yu4, Qixing Mao1,2, Wenjie Xia1,2, Run Shi1,2, Jie Wang1, Lin Xu2,1.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is generally applied in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the radioresistance of ESCC still remains an obstacle for the curative effect of this treatment. We hypothesized that diisopropylamine dichloroacetate (DADA), an inhibitor of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), might enhance radiosensitizationin resistant ESCC. The clonogenic survival assay revealed that DADA sensitized ESCC cells to radiotherapy in vitro; furthermore, the combination of DADA and radiotherapy increased the expression of γ-H2AX, which is a hallmark of DNA double-strand breaks. Arrest at G2/M phase as well as the induction of apoptosis of ESCC cells were also observed in the cells treated with the combination of DADA and radiotherapy. Notably, xenograft tumor growth was significantly suppressed in vivo by combined radiotherapy and DADA administration. It has been proven that glycolysis is highly correlated with radioresistance, which could be reversed by the shift from glycolysis to mitochondrial oxidation. In our present study, we found that DADA could modulate oxidative phosphorylation as well as increase the intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Collectively, we concluded that DADA-induced intracellular ROS accumulation was identified as the key factor of radiotherapy sensitization of ESCC.Entities:
Keywords: ROS; diisopropylamine dichloroacetate; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; radiosensitization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27626688 PMCID: PMC5356547 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Toxicity of DADA and DCA on human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines
The ESCC cell lines Eca-109 (A) and TE-13 (B) were seeded in 96-well plates in triplicate and treated with various concentrations of DADA and DCA for 24 h. Cell viability was determined by the CCK8 assay.
Figure 2DADA sensitized ESCC cells to radiotherapy in vitro
(A) The survival curves of ESCC. The clonogenic survival assay was used to assess the radiosensitization of DADA on Eca-109 and TE-13 cells. The cells were treated with 10 mM or 8 mM, respectively, and ionizing radiation as illustrated followed by harvesting after incubation for 10–14 d. (B) DADA increased the number of DNA double-strand breaks induced by RT. Eca-109 and TE-13 cells were treated with eitherX-rays alone or in combination with DADA. After incubation for the appropriate time, the cells were fixed for the immunofluorescence detection of γ-H2AX (green). DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Eca-109 and TE-13 cells were treated with either X-rays alone or in combinationwith DADA and subjected to Western blot analysis of the DNA double-strand break-related protein γ-H2AX. (C) Cell cycle distribution after different treatments of ESCC cell lines. Eca-109 and TE-13 cells were treated with DADA, X-rays or the combination treatment and then collected for analysis of cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry. (D) Apoptosis percentage in different treatments of ESCC cell lines. Cells were seeded into 6-well plates at the adequate concentration; incubated with DADA, X-rays or the combination treatment and then harvested after incubation for forty-eight hours. The cells were examined by flow cytometry for apoptosis after staining with annexin-V-FITC/PI. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. * indicated statistical significance versus the control group (p < 0.05).
Radiosensitization effects of DADA on ESCC cells in vitro
| D0 | Dq | SF2 | SER | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eca-109 | 1.86 | 1.41 | 0.89 | |
| Eca-109+DPDA | 1.36 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 1.37 |
| Te-13 | 1.52 | 1.08 | 0.81 | |
| Te-13+DPDA | 1.44 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 1.06 |
D0, lethal radiation dose; Dq, quasi-threshold dose; SF2, fraction of cells surviving after 2 Gy radiation; SER, radiosensitization radio (sensitization enhancement ratio), calculated as D0 for the control group divided by D0 for the treatment group.
Figure 3DADA sensitized ESCC cells to radiotherapy in vivo.
(A–B) The tumor volume of each group was measured at the end of the observation. (C) The tumor weight was measured at the end of the observation. (D) The body weight of the mice subjected to the different treatments was measured at the end of the observation. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *indicated statistical significance versus the control group (p < 0.05).
Figure 4The combination of DADA and radiotherapy increased the oxygen consumption rate (OCR), resulting in increased intracellular levels of ROS in ESCC cell lines
(A) ESCC cell lines were subjected to DADA, X-rays or the combination treatments and harvested for analysis of their ROS levels by flow cytometry. (B) Eca-109 and TE-13 cells were treated with DADA. The bioenergetic profiles of these cells were measured using sequential injection of oligomycin, FCCP, and a mixture of antimycin and rotenone.* indicated statistical significance versus control cells (p < 0.05).