Literature DB >> 276266

Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis.

Y H Kim, J J Vietas.   

Abstract

1. Cephalograms of 102 children with normal occlusion (Group 1) and 874 children with various malocclusions were analyzed to determine which measurements would produce the highest correlation against the displacement of the molar relationships. 2. Molar displacement was measured directly on the study casts, and an average of the measurements of the right and the left sides was obtained. 3. The malocclusion sample was divided into groups according to molar displacement: 214 neutroclusion cases (Group 2), 624 distoclusion cases (Group 3), and 36 mesioclusion cases (Group 4). 4. The mean value of the anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) in the normal group was 81.4 degrees, with a standard deviation of 3.79. 5. The APDI reading was obtained by tabulating the facial angle plus or minus the A-B plane angle and plus or minus the palatal plane angle. 6. Among the measurements tested, the APDI was found to show the highest correlation against the molar displacement, with a correlation value of 0.643. 7. The four variable that produced the highest correlation coefficient value--that is, the ANB angle (-0.495), the A-B pland angle (0.566), the "Wits" appraisal (-0.639), and the APDI (0.643)--were subjected to a study of their frequency distribution patterns. High percentage of overlapping of the two extreme groups (distoclusion and mesioclusion groups) were found in the above variables, with the exception of the APDI. 8. A discussion of the differential diagnostic value of the APDI was presented, together with illustrations and various clinical examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 276266     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90223-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  20 in total

1.  Influence of maxillary posterior discrepancy on upper molar vertical position and facial vertical dimensions in subjects with or without skeletal open bite.

Authors:  Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Luis Fernando Pérez-Vargas; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Overbite depth indicator and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator cephalometric norms for African Americans.

Authors:  Samuel Obamiyi; Zhihui Wang; Edward Sommers; P Emile Rossouw; Dimitrios Michelogiannakis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Automatic Classification for Sagittal Craniofacial Patterns Based on Different Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Haizhen Li; Ying Xu; Yi Lei; Qing Wang; Xuemei Gao
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Comparison of Wits appraisal among different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2012-10

5.  Cephalometric investigation of first cervical vertebrae morphology and hyoid position in young adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Seher Gündüz Arslan; Neval Dildeş; Jalen Devecioglu Kama
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-24

6.  Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?

Authors:  Shipra Nagar; Rohit Nagar; Pradeep Raghav
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

7.  Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.

Authors:  Claudia Lindner; Ching-Wei Wang; Cheng-Ta Huang; Chung-Hsing Li; Sheng-Wei Chang; Tim F Cootes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Reliability of overbite depth indicator (ODI) and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) in the assessment of different vertical and sagittal dental malocclusions: a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Authors:  Farheen Fatima; Mubassar Fida; Attiya Shaikh
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

9.  Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.

Authors:  Rahul Trivedi; Amit Bhattacharya; Falguni Mehta; Dolly Patel; Harshik Parekh; Vaibhav Gandhi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Influence of maxillary posterior dentoalveolar discrepancy on angulation of maxillary molars in individuals with skeletal open bite.

Authors:  Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.