| Literature DB >> 27625772 |
C Hernández-Hernández1, Procopio Alejandro López-Andrade1, Miguel A Ramírez-Guillermo1, Diana Guerra Ramírez2, Juan F Caballero Pérez1.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to evaluate four different cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) fermentation conditions and their effect on fermented bean quality, in order to be able to recommend the most suitable condition to producers in the municipality of Huimanguillo, Tabasco, Mexico. Fermentations were carried out in square wooden boxes with capacity for 1000, 300, and 100 kg of fresh beans, as well as a rotary drum with capacity for 500 kg thereof. The fermentation process was carried out for 7 days, and the response variables measured were mass temperature, total soluble solids (TSS), pH, and acidity. The TSS were totally depleted after 2 days, during which time the yeasts transformed them into ethanol at temperatures of 25-35°C. The most notable temperature increase in the four treatments was 49°C on the third day, corresponding to a decrease in pH from 6.31 ± 0.40 to 4.76 ± 0.03 and an increase in acidity from 0.38 ± 0.04 to 1.17 ± 0.25 g kg(-1), due to the formation of organic acids. There were no significant differences among the four treatments (Tukey α = 0.05). The cut test showed that fermentation in 300- and 100-kg boxes and in the 500-kg rotary drum produced the same effect on fermentation quality, but the 1000-kg boxes exhibited lower quality (Tukey α = 0.05).Entities:
Keywords: Beans quality; Tabasco; boxes; temperature
Year: 2016 PMID: 27625772 PMCID: PMC5011376 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1(A) Surrounding temperature (S.T.) in the four treatments. (B) Changes in temperature during the fermentation of the four treatments without significant differences (α = 0.05). F.T. (Fermentation temperature) S. T. (Surrounding temperature in the four treatments).
Figure 2Behavior of total soluble solids, pH and titratable acidity during fermentation in the four treatments.
Figure 3Final fermentation quality in beans of the different treatments.
Figure 4Cut test score in the different treatments.