| Literature DB >> 27625768 |
Ping Li1, Shiqie Bai2, Minghong You2, Yixin Shen3.
Abstract
It is difficult to make good quality of silage from alpine gramineous from the Qinghai Tibetan plateau. The effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Siberian wildrye silage were studied in southeast of the Qinghai Tibetan plateau. Siberian wildrye materials were freshly cut at the sprouting stage, flowering stage, and milky stage. Silage was prepared by using a small-scale silage fermentation system (bag silos). Lactobacillus plantarum (LP, 5 × 10(8) cfu/kg FM), Lactobacillus buchneri (LB, 5 × 10(8) cfu/kg FM) and their mixture (LP+LB, 5 × 10(8) cfu/kg FM) as silage additives were separately added to ensiled forages, and no additive served as control (CK). These bag silos were kept at room temperature (<15°C), and the silage qualities were analyzed after 60 days of ensiling. The number of indigenous LAB on fresh materials was less than that of yeasts and molds, and LAB species showed specification adapted to low temperature. LAB inoculated silages had lower (P < 0.05) pH value, NH 3-N/TN and butyric acid content compared with control silage. Silage treated with LB had higher contents of acetic acid, propionic acid, WSC and CP. However, the aerobic stability of silages inoculated with LAB did not differ significantly between stages (P > 0.05). When fermentation characteristics, chemical composition, and aerobic stability were considered, treatment with L. plantarum resulted in high quality of Siberian wildrye silage harvested at the flowering stage in the alpine region.Entities:
Keywords: Fermentation quality; Siberian wildrye silage; Tibetan Plateau; lactic acid bacteria
Year: 2016 PMID: 27625768 PMCID: PMC5011372 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Chemical and microbiological analysis of ensiling materials
| Stage | %FM | % DM | log Cfu/g DM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | WSC | CP | NDF | ADF | LAB | Yeast | Molds | |
| Heading | 30.38c | 7.57 | 12.26a | 53.90c | 32.68c | 2.3ab | 4.7c | 4.1b |
| Flowering | 34.83b | 7.13 | 7.01c | 59.39a | 38.47a | 2.8a | 6.1a | 5.9a |
| Milky | 40.85a | 7.14 | 9.55b | 56.17ab | 38.62a | 1.9b | 6.3a | 5.8a |
| Standard error of mean (SEM) | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
Means of DM content at ensiling within column with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05).
The effect of LAB and maturity stage on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of silage
| Treatment | Maturity stage | pH | %DM | %TN | Aerobic stability (h) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | AA | PA | BA | NH3‐N | ||||
| No additive (CK) | Sprouting stage | 4.35b | 1.69g | 0.52e | 0.22g | 0.14b | 10.30a | 98.67gh |
| Flowering stage | 4.40ab | 2.38e | 0.92cd | 0.16ghi | 0.17ab | 5.96d | 92.00h | |
| Milky stage | 4.52a | 1.70g | 0.90cd | 0.32f | 0.19a | 7.38c | 107.33g | |
|
| Sprouting stage | 3.75f | 3.86a | 0.82d | 0.15hi | 0.06c | 8.60b | 156.67f |
| Flowering stage | 4.13e | 2.78d | 0.82d | 0.12i | 0.04cde | 6.25d | 191.33d | |
| Milky stage | 4.31bc | 2.69d | 0.38f | 0.17gh | 0.06c | 5.55d | 155.00f | |
|
| Sprouting stage | 3.82f | 3.10c | 1.61a | 0.82b | 0.01de | 7.09c | 241.00a |
| Flowering stage | 4.28bcd | 2.38e | 1.48b | 0.75c | 0.05c | 9.07b | 224.33b | |
| Milky stage | 4.20cde | 2.22ef | 0.93cd | 0.98a | 0.01de | 6.12d | 206.67c | |
| LP+LB | Sprouting stage | 4.14de | 3.32b | 0.96c | 0.52d | 0.03cde | 9.07b | 171.67e |
| Flowering stage | 4.34bc | 2.78d | 0.21g | 0.49d | 0.01e | 7.71c | 200.67cd | |
| Milky stage | 4.32bc | 2.13f | 0.80f | 0.43e | 0.04cd | 5.96d | 170.00e | |
| Standard error of mean (SEM) | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 7.96 | |
| Treatment | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Maturity stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.120 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Treatment × Maturity stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Means of treatment within column with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05).
The effect of LAB and maturity stage on chemical composition of silage
| Treatment | Maturity stage | %FM | %DM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | WSC | CP | aNDF | ADF | ||
| No additive (CK) | Sprouting stage | 27.69g | 0.85cde | 11.17b | 56.69b | 34.28ef |
| Flowering stage | 34.21d | 0.85cde | 7.49cde | 62.25a | 40.48bc | |
| Milky stage | 41.54a | 1.13b | 5.52fg | 61.41a | 41.39b | |
|
| Sprouting stage | 29.48f | 0.90cd | 12.77a | 55.49b | 33.65f |
| Flowering stage | 34.43d | 0.60g | 8.08cd | 62.87a | 44.38a | |
| Milky stage | 39.13b | 0.68efg | 6.47ef | 63.51a | 44.52a | |
|
| Sprouting stage | 31.22e | 1.06bc | 12.28ab | 55.47b | 35.61de |
| Flowering stage | 35.37d | 1.21ab | 7.52cde | 60.84a | 44.22a | |
| Milky stage | 36.87c | 0.63fg | 6.88de | 61.45a | 43.90a | |
| LP+LB | Sprouting stage | 27.47g | 1.41a | 10.98b | 56.79b | 36.07d |
| Flowering stage | 34.50d | 0.61g | 8.60c | 61.48a | 38.80c | |
| Milky stage | 42.15a | 1.19ab | 4.74g | 60.36a | 39.27c | |
| Standard error of mean (SEM) | 0.81 | 0.05 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.67 | |
| Treatment | 0.824 | <0.001 | 0.012 | 0.444 | <0.001 | |
| Maturity stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Treatment × Maturity stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.031 | 0.575 | <0.001 | |
Means of treatment within column with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05).