Literature DB >> 27625377

Blood Flow Into Basilar Tip Aneurysms: A Predictor for Recanalization After Coil Embolization.

Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama1, Kuniyasu Niizuma2, Kenichi Sato2, Sherif Rashad2, Misaki Kohama2, Hidenori Endo2, Toshiki Endo2, Yasushi Matsumoto2, Makoto Ohta2, Teiji Tominaga2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Hemodynamic forces may play a role in the recanalization of coiled aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of presurgical hemodynamics on the efficacy of coil embolization for basilar tip aneurysms.
METHODS: We identified 82 patients who underwent endovascular coil embolization for basilar tip aneurysms with a follow-up of >1 year. Presurgical hemodynamics were investigated using computational fluid dynamics with 3-dimensional data derived from rotational angiography. During postprocessing, we quantified the rate of net flow entering the aneurysm through its neck and calculated the proportion of the aneurysmal inflow rate to the basilar artery flow rate. In addition, we investigated the correlation between the basilar bifurcation configuration and the hemodynamics.
RESULTS: Twenty-five of the 82 patients were excluded because of difficult vascular geometry reconstruction. Among the 57 examined patients, angiographic recanalization was observed in 19 patients (33.3%). The proportion of the aneurysmal inflow rate to the basilar artery flow rate and a coil packing density <30% were independent and significant predictors for the recanalization of coiled aneurysms. Additional investigation revealed that a small branch angle formed by the basilar artery and the posterior cerebral artery increased blood flow into the aneurysm.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of the aneurysmal inflow rate to the basilar artery flow rate, influenced by the basilar bifurcation configuration, was an independent and significant predictor for recanalization after coil embolization in basilar tip aneurysms.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemodynamics; intracranial aneurysm; recurrence; rest; risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27625377     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  18 in total

Review 1.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge Device Associated with Stenting: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  F Cagnazzo; R Ahmed; C Dargazanli; P-H Lefevre; G Gascou; I Derraz; S A Kalmanovich; C Riquelme; A Bonafe; V Costalat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment.

Authors:  S Fukuda; Y Shimogonya; N Yonemoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Aneurysm characteristics, coil packing, and post-coiling hemodynamics affect long-term treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert J Damiano; Vincent M Tutino; Nikhil Paliwal; Tatsat R Patel; Muhammad Waqas; Elad I Levy; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Predisposing factors for recanalization of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular embolization: a multivariate study.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhang; Linkai Jing; Jian Liu; Kun Wang; Ying Zhang; Nikhil Paliwal; Hui Meng; Yang Wang; Shengzhang Wang; Xinjian Yang
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Long-Term Results and Follow-Up Examinations after Endovascular Embolization for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  T Murakami; T Nishida; K Asai; Y Kadono; H Nakamura; T Fujinaka; H Kishima
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Hemodynamic Comparison of Treatment Strategies for Intracranial Vertebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysms.

Authors:  Yeqing Jiang; Gang Lu; Liang Ge; Rong Zou; Gaohui Li; Hailin Wan; Xiaochang Leng; Jianping Xiang; Xiaolong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Using a Porous Media Setting Predicts Outcome after Flow-Diverter Treatment.

Authors:  M Beppu; M Tsuji; F Ishida; M Shirakawa; H Suzuki; S Yoshimura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Hemodynamics and coil distribution with changing coil stiffness and length in intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Soichiro Fujimura; Hiroyuki Takao; Takashi Suzuki; Chihebeddine Dahmani; Toshihiro Ishibashi; Hiroya Mamori; Makoto Yamamoto; Yuichi Murayama
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study.

Authors:  Soichiro Fujimura; Hiroyuki Takao; Takashi Suzuki; Chihebeddine Dahmani; Toshihiro Ishibashi; Hiroya Mamori; Makoto Yamamoto; Yuichi Murayama
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 5.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.