| Literature DB >> 27625084 |
Zhao-Lei Jiang1, Xiao-Yuan Feng2, Nan Ma1, Jia-Quan Zhu1, Li Zhang1, Fang-Bao Ding1, Chun-Rong Bao1, Ju Mei1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right minithoracotomy (RM) has been proven to be a safe and effective approach for mitral valve surgery, but the differences of artificial chordae technique between RM and median sternotomy (MS) were seldom reported. Here, we compared the outcomes of modified artificial chordae technique for mitral regurgitation (MR) through RM or MS approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27625084 PMCID: PMC5022333 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.189917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1(a) Modified artificial chordae technique; (b) placing the suture on the head of the papillary muscle and the prolapsing portion of mitral leaflet; (c) tying and cutting the knot after length adjustment; (d) valve competency was tested again by injecting cold saline into the left ventricle after mitral valvuloplasty.
Baseline characteristics in both RM and MS groups
| Variables | RM group | MS group | Statistical value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 58 | 60 | / | / |
| Age (years) | 55.8 ± 10.2 | 58.9 ± 9.1 | −1.744* | 0.084 |
| Female, | 26 (44.8) | 21 (35.0) | 1.188† | 0.276 |
| Valve lesion, | ||||
| Posterior | 37 (63.8) | 33 (55.0) | 0.945† | 0.331 |
| Anterior | 14 (24.1) | 18 (30.0) | 0.513† | 0.474 |
| Posterior and anterior | 7 (12.1) | 9 (15.0) | 0.216† | 0.642 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 56.2 ± 5.7 | 57.1 ± 7.1 | −0.750* | 0.455 |
| LVEF (%) | 53.4 ± 3.5 | 52.7 ± 5.5 | 0.867* | 0.388 |
| Mitral regurgitation, | ||||
| Severe (++++) | 58 | 60 | / | / |
| Tricuspid regurgitation, | ||||
| Mild (++) | 8 (13.8) | 10 (16.7) | 0.188† | 0.664 |
| Moderate (+++) | 4 (6.9) | 5 (8.3) | / | 1.000 |
| Severe (++++) | 1 (1.7) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| Hypertension, | 10 (17.2) | 8 (13.3) | 0.348† | 0.555 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 5 (8.6) | 3 (5.0) | / | 0.487 |
| Cerebrovascular disease, | 2 (3.4) | 4 (6.7) | / | 0.680 |
| Endocarditis, | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| Renal dysfunction, | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| COPD, | 1 (1.7) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| Cardiac function (NYHA), | ||||
| I | 12 (20.7) | 9 (15.0) | 0.653† | 0.419 |
| II | 32 (55.2) | 26 (43.3) | 1.654† | 0.198 |
| III | 13 (22.4) | 21 (35.0) | 2.278† | 0.131 |
| IV | 1 (1.7) | 4 (6.7) | / | 0.365 |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. *t value; †χ2 value. COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LVEDD: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF: Left ventricular ejection Fraction; NYHA: New York Heart Association; /: Not applicable; RM: Right minithoracotomy; MS: Median sternotomy.
Perioperative results in both RM and MS groups
| Variables | RM group | MS group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 58 | 60 | / | / |
| Number of artificial chordae | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | −1.363 | 0.176 |
| CPB time (min) | 85.7 ± 9.5 | 83.9 ± 9.9 | 1.047 | 0.297 |
| ACC time (min) | 61.9 ± 9.3 | 60.3 ± 9.0 | 0.938 | 0.350 |
| Ring size (mm) | 29.1 ± 1.9 | 29.4 ± 1.8 | −0.780 | 0.437 |
| Postoperative ventilation time (h) | 9.9 ± 4.3 | 15.9 ± 4.7 | −7.221 | <0.001 |
| Postoperative hospital stay (days) | 7.4 ± 1.2 | 9.2 ± 1.7 | −6.638 | <0.001 |
| Early postoperative complications, | ||||
| Low cardiac output syndrome | 1 (1.7) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| New onset atrial fibrillation | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| Acute renal dysfunction | 1 (1.7) | 1 (1.7) | / | 1.000 |
| Reoperation for bleeding | 0 (0) | 1 (1.7) | / | 1.000 |
| MR at discharge, | ||||
| None or trivial (0 – +) | 56 (96.6) | 58 (96.7) | / | 1.000 |
| Mild (++) | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.3) | / | 1.000 |
| Moderate (+++) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | / | / |
| Severe (++++) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | / | / |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. ACC: Aortic cross-clamp; CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass; /: Not applicable; RM: Right minithoracotomy; MS: Median sternotomy; MR: Mitral regurgitation.
Figure 2The freedom from more than moderate mitral regurgitation after mitral valvuloplasty of the two groups. RM: Right minithoracotomy; MS: Median sternotomy; MR: Mitral regurgitation.
Cox regression analysis
| Variables | 95% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative LVEDD ≥65 mm | 1.545 | 0.636–5.061 | 0.352 |
| Preoperative significant TR | 0.519 | 0.237–1.134 | 0.100 |
| Both anterior and posterior leaflet prolapse | 1.086 | 0.089–4.812 | 0.823 |
| Mild MR at discharge | 3.329 | 0.637–10.809 | 0.027 |
CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio; LVEDD: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; TR: Tricuspid regurgitation; MR: Mitral regurgitation.