Hannah E Berg1, Elizabeth D Ballard2, David A Luckenbaugh1, Allison C Nugent1, Dawn F Ionescu3, Carlos A Zarate1. 1. Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 2. Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: Elizabeth.Ballard@nih.gov. 3. Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression have each been independently associated with impairments in emotional face recognition. However, little is known about the nature of these impairments when anxiety and depression co-occur. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis evaluated the relationship between anxiety status and performance on the Emotional Expression Multimorph Task within a clinical sample of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). RESULTS: Participants with anxious depression (n=14) and nonanxious depression (n=14) completed the Emotional Expression Multimorph Task. Those with anxious depression required greater intensity of emotion to identify both happy (p=.01) and sad (p=.04) facial expressions than those with nonanxious depression. Severity of anxiety also correlated with greater intensity of emotion required to detect sad faces. Contrary to prediction, hypervigilance to angry and fearful facial expressions was not observed in anxious depression. LIMITATIONS: The present study did not include an anxiety-only group for comparison, and did not assess state anxiety at time of administration. In addition, the extent to which the experimental task correlates with social functioning is not fully understood. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a diminished sensitivity to happy and sad facial expressions specific to anxious depression, but not a hypervigilance toward threatening facial expressions. Further research on the nature of emotion recognition in anxiety and depression may inform improved clinical interventions. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Anxiety and depression have each been independently associated with impairments in emotional face recognition. However, little is known about the nature of these impairments when anxiety and depression co-occur. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis evaluated the relationship between anxiety status and performance on the Emotional Expression Multimorph Task within a clinical sample of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). RESULTS:Participants with anxious depression (n=14) and nonanxious depression (n=14) completed the Emotional Expression Multimorph Task. Those with anxious depression required greater intensity of emotion to identify both happy (p=.01) and sad (p=.04) facial expressions than those with nonanxious depression. Severity of anxiety also correlated with greater intensity of emotion required to detect sad faces. Contrary to prediction, hypervigilance to angry and fearful facial expressions was not observed in anxious depression. LIMITATIONS: The present study did not include an anxiety-only group for comparison, and did not assess state anxiety at time of administration. In addition, the extent to which the experimental task correlates with social functioning is not fully understood. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a diminished sensitivity to happy and sad facial expressions specific to anxious depression, but not a hypervigilance toward threatening facial expressions. Further research on the nature of emotion recognition in anxiety and depression may inform improved clinical interventions. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Amy Farabaugh; Jonathan Alpert; Stephen R Wisniewski; Michael W Otto; Maurizio Fava; Lee Baer; Roy Perlis; Ed Friedman; Maren Nyer; Stella Bitran; G K Balasubramani; Aya Inamori; Madhukar Trivedi; Michael E Thase Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Kathryn L Schaefer; Jacqueline Baumann; Brendan A Rich; David A Luckenbaugh; Carlos A Zarate Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Maurizio Fava; Jonathan E Alpert; Cheryl N Carmin; Stephen R Wisniewski; Madhukar H Trivedi; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Don Morgan; Terry Schwartz; G K Balasubramani; A John Rush Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Maurizio Fava; A John Rush; Jonathan E Alpert; G K Balasubramani; Stephen R Wisniewski; Cheryl N Carmin; Melanie M Biggs; Sidney Zisook; Andrew Leuchter; Robert Howland; Diane Warden; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Marie Luise Schreiter; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Tjalf Ziemssen; Christian Beste Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Lauren A Rutter; Luke Scheuer; Ipsit V Vahia; Brent P Forester; Jordan W Smoller; Laura Germine Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Lance M Rappaport; Nicole Di Nardo; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Roxann Roberson-Nay; John M Hettema Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2021-06-07
Authors: Gabrielle Simcock; Larisa T McLoughlin; Tamara De Regt; Kathryn M Broadhouse; Denise Beaudequin; Jim Lagopoulos; Daniel F Hermens Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Leonardo Tozzi; Brooke Staveland; Bailey Holt-Gosselin; Megan Chesnut; Sarah E Chang; David Choi; Melissa Shiner; Hua Wu; Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga; Olaf Sporns; Deanna M Barch; Ian H Gotlib; Trevor J Hastie; Adam B Kerr; Russell A Poldrack; Brian A Wandell; Max Wintermark; Leanne M Williams Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 7.400