| Literature DB >> 27624327 |
Michael Berktold1, Wolfgang Mutschlechner1, Dorothea Orth-Höller2.
Abstract
Rapid microbial diagnostics is important for septicemic patients. The current gold standard is blood culture with consecutive pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. However, these culture-based methods need at least 48 h.The aim of this study was to compare Verigene® (Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA), a rapid hybridization-based method, with conventional culture-based methods for detection of pathogens and resistance markers from positive blood cultures of septic patients.In 85 of 100 tested blood culture samples (85 %), pathogen identification as well as resistance profile were identical in Verigene and conventional culture. In 4 %, discordant results were observed. In 9 %, conventional culture revealed a pathogen ID or resistance phenotype not included in the Verigene panel. In 2 % no Verigene result was available.In conclusion, Verigene offers the availability of fast and reliable pathogen identification and resistance profile determination, which may result in an earlier start of adequate antimicrobial treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Conventional culture; Resistance markers; Septic patient; Verigene
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27624327 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-1057-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr ISSN: 0043-5325 Impact factor: 1.704