Literature DB >> 27623693

Mobile-bearing TKA improved the anteroposterior joint stability in mid-flexion range comparing to fixed-bearing TKA.

Yukihide Minoda1, Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi2, Shigekazu Mizokawa2, Yoichi Ohta2, Hiroaki Nakamura2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proper anteroposterior (AP) joint displacement is an important indicator of good clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that a newly introduced mobile-bearing posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis reduces the AP joint displacement. The aim of this study is to compare the AP joint displacement between a newly introduced mobile-bearing PS TKA in one knee and a conventional fixed-bearing PS TKA in other knee.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 82 knees in 41 patients who had bilateral TKAs were investigated. All the patients received a conventional fixed-bearing PS prosthesis in one knee and a highly congruent mobile-bearing PS prosthesis in the other knee. AP joint displacement was measured using the KT-2000 arthrometer, at 30° and 75° in flexion, at average of 3.3 years after the operation.
RESULTS: AP joint displacements at 30° in flexion were 6 ± 3 mm in the knees with the mobile-bearing PS prosthesis and 9 ± 4 mm in the knee with fixed-bearing PS prosthesis (p < 0.001). AP joint displacements at 75° in flexion were 4 ± 2 mm in the knees with the mobile-bearing PS prosthesis and 6 ± 3 mm in the knee with fixed-bearing PS prosthesis (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the design of the prosthesis can improve the AP joint stability in mid-flexion range.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anteroposterior displacement; Fixed-bearing prosthesis; Mobile-bearing prosthesis; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27623693     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2567-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  5 in total

1.  Investigation of the effect of intraoperative mediolateral stability on postoperative sagittal stability after bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazushige Seki; Toshihiro Seki; Hiroyoshi Ogasa; Takashi Imagama; Yuta Matsuki; Kazuhiro Yamazaki; Takashi Sakai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-10-08

2.  Varus-valgus stability at 90° flexion correlates with the stability at midflexion range more widely than that at 0° extension in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunori Hino; Tatsuhiko Kutsuna; Kunihiko Watamori; Hiroshi Kiyomatsu; Yasumitsu Ishimaru; Jun Takeba; Seiji Watanabe; Yoshitaka Shiraishi; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Similar outcomes including maximum knee flexion between mobile bearing condylar-stabilised and fixed bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis: a case control study.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Moussa Kafelov; Stanislas Gunst; Cécile Batailler; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-02-15

4.  Medial pivot-based total knee arthroplasty achieves better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michitaka Kato; Hideki Warashina; Shingo Mitamura; Akito Kataoka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Zeng; Meng-Ning Yan; Hui-Wu Li; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.