Shekufe Akhter1, Michele Marcus2, Rich A Kerber1, Maiying Kong3, Kira C Taylor4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 3. Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. Electronic address: kira.taylor@louisville.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the association between periconceptional self-reported stress levels and fecundability in women. METHODS: Daily stress was reported on a scale from 1 to 4 (lowest to highest) among 400 women who completed daily diaries including data on lifestyle and behavioral factors, menstrual characteristics, contraceptive use, and intercourse for up to 20 cycles or until pregnancy. Discrete survival analysis was used to estimate the associations between self-reported stress during specific windows of the menstrual cycle and fecundability (cycles at risk until pregnancy), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine women became pregnant. During the follicular phase, there was a 46% reduction in fecundability for a 1-unit increase in self-reported stress during the estimated ovulatory window (fecundability odds ratio [FOR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.84) and an attenuated trend for the preovulatory window (FOR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.10). During the luteal phase, higher stress was associated with increased probability of conception (FOR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.50), possibly due to reverse causality. CONCLUSIONS: Higher stress during the ovulatory window may reduce probability of conception; however, once conception occurs, changes in the hormonal milieu and/or knowledge of the pregnancy may result in increased stress. These findings reinforce the need for encouraging stress management techniques in the aspiring and expecting mother.
PURPOSE: To examine the association between periconceptional self-reported stress levels and fecundability in women. METHODS: Daily stress was reported on a scale from 1 to 4 (lowest to highest) among 400 women who completed daily diaries including data on lifestyle and behavioral factors, menstrual characteristics, contraceptive use, and intercourse for up to 20 cycles or until pregnancy. Discrete survival analysis was used to estimate the associations between self-reported stress during specific windows of the menstrual cycle and fecundability (cycles at risk until pregnancy), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine women became pregnant. During the follicular phase, there was a 46% reduction in fecundability for a 1-unit increase in self-reported stress during the estimated ovulatory window (fecundability odds ratio [FOR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.84) and an attenuated trend for the preovulatory window (FOR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.10). During the luteal phase, higher stress was associated with increased probability of conception (FOR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.50), possibly due to reverse causality. CONCLUSIONS: Higher stress during the ovulatory window may reduce probability of conception; however, once conception occurs, changes in the hormonal milieu and/or knowledge of the pregnancy may result in increased stress. These findings reinforce the need for encouraging stress management techniques in the aspiring and expecting mother.
Authors: Michael J Kreisman; Richard B McCosh; Katherine Tian; Christopher I Song; Kellie M Breen Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Jennifer L Weuve; Ann Aschengrau; Rebecca J Song; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jennifer J Yland; Taiyao Wang; Zahra Zad; Sydney K Willis; Tanran R Wang; Amelia K Wesselink; Tammy Jiang; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Joan A Casey; Alison Gemmill; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Rachel Morello-Frosch Journal: Environ Health Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.984