Literature DB >> 27623193

Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measures.

Dane Jensen Brodke1, Man Hung, Kevin J Bozic.   

Abstract

The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to objectively and quantifiably assess patient symptomatology allows tracking of symptoms over time, measurement of the effect of healthcare interventions, and performance of cost-effectiveness analyses to assess and compare the value of treatment options. Many of the PROMs historically used had limited versatility because they were developed using classical test theory, which generates static tests that are not comparable with other measures assessing similar outcomes. Recently developed PROMs, however, were designed according to the principles of the newer item response theory (IRT), which allows for the creation of dynamic instruments deliverable in a variety of forms that are readily comparable with similar measures. IRT also enables computerized adaptive testing to decrease the burden of using PROMs by allowing rapid and complete data acquisition. IRT-based instruments are suitable for patient care and research and have been validated in a variety of populations, many of which are relevant to orthopaedic populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27623193     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  10 in total

1.  Streamlining Trauma Research Evaluation With Advanced Measurement (STREAM) Study: Implementation of the PROMIS Toolbox Within an Orthopaedic Trauma Clinical Trials Consortium.

Authors:  Anthony R Carlini; Susan C Collins; Elena D Staguhn; Katherine P Frey; Robert V O'Toole; Kristin R Archer; William T Obremskey; Julie Agel; Conor P Kleweno; Saam Morshed; Michael J Weaver; Thomas F Higgins; Michael J Bosse; Joseph F Levy; Albert W Wu; Renan C Castillo
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Time to Completion of Pediatric PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing Measures and the SRS-22r in an Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Population.

Authors:  Chinmay S Paranjape; Olivia B de Araujo; Lisa M Reider; Paul D Sponseller; Anthony R Carlini; Kevin McLaughlin; Keith R Bachmann; Stuart L Mitchell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Construct Validity of Pediatric PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing Measures in Children With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Mitchell; Kevin H McLaughlin; Keith R Bachmann; Paul D Sponseller; Lisa M Reider
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  How Do PROMIS Scores Correspond to Common Physical Abilities?

Authors:  Dane J Brodke; Chong Zhang; Jeremy D Shaw; Amy M Cizik; Charles L Saltzman; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders.

Authors:  Man Hung; Charles L Saltzman; Maren W Voss; Jerry Bounsanga; Richard Kendall; Ryan Spiker; Brandon Lawrence; Darrel Brodke
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Is the Neck Disability Index an Appropriate Measure for Changes in Physical Function After Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Authors:  Dhruv K C Goyal; Hamadi A Murphy; Douglas A Hollern; Srikanth N Divi; Kristen Nicholson; Christie Stawicki; I David Kaye; Gregory D Schroeder; Barrett I Woods; Mark F Kurd; Jeffrey A Rihn; D Greg Anderson; Christopher K Kepler; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kristen E Radcliff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

7.  What Does Your PROMIS Score Mean? Improving the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Jeremy D Shaw; Ross McEntarfer; Jason Ferrel; Natasha Greene; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Brandon D Lawrence; William R Spiker; Nicholas Spina; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-14

8.  Use of computerised adaptive testing to reduce the number of items in patient-reported hip and knee outcome scores: an analysis of the NHS England National Patient-Reported Outcome Measures programme.

Authors:  Jonathan Peter Evans; Christopher Gibbons; Andrew D Toms; Jose Maria Valderas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  General treatment principles for fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group.

Authors:  Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Mario Morgenstern; Eric Senneville; Olivier Borens; Geertje A M Govaert; Jolien Onsea; Melissa Depypere; R Geoff Richards; Andrej Trampuz; Michael H J Verhofstad; Stephen L Kates; Michael Raschke; Martin A McNally; William T Obremskey
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group.

Authors:  Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kate E Webster; Jón Karlsson; Theresa Diermeier; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Sean J Meredith; Thomas Rauer; James J Irrgang; Kurt P Spindler; C Benjamin Ma; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.