Christopher T Holley1, Megan Fitzpatrick1, Samit S Roy2, M Chadi Alraies2, Rebecca Cogswell2, Laura Souslian1, Peter Eckman3, Ranjit John4. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 3. Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: johnx008@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aortic insufficiency (AI) is a significant long-term complication of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We sought to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes and mortality in CF-LVAD recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients implanted with HeartMate II CF-LVADs at our institution from June 2005 through June 2013. We evaluated recipients' baseline characteristics and annual echocardiograms, grading AI severity as either none, trace, mild, moderate or severe. Only moderate or severe AI was considered clinically significant. Recipients who underwent concomitant aortic valve surgery or who had undergone previous prosthetic aortic valve implantation were excluded. RESULTS: Moderate or severe AI occurred in 32 (15.2%) patients. Risk factors that significantly affected the development of AI included older age at the time of implantation, female gender, longer duration of LVAD support and destination therapy designation. Freedom from moderate or severe AI was 94%, 76% and 65% of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Overall cohort survival based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 78%, 59% and 42% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. There was no difference in survival between recipients who developed significant AI and those who did not (log-rank test, p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, single-institution study, the overall rate of AI was low, but increased in frequency with longer duration of LVAD support. Although AI development remains a concern for patients on long-term CF-LVAD support, AI development does not appear to impact long-term mortality.
BACKGROUND:Aortic insufficiency (AI) is a significant long-term complication of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We sought to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes and mortality in CF-LVAD recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients implanted with HeartMate II CF-LVADs at our institution from June 2005 through June 2013. We evaluated recipients' baseline characteristics and annual echocardiograms, grading AI severity as either none, trace, mild, moderate or severe. Only moderate or severe AI was considered clinically significant. Recipients who underwent concomitant aortic valve surgery or who had undergone previous prosthetic aortic valve implantation were excluded. RESULTS: Moderate or severe AI occurred in 32 (15.2%) patients. Risk factors that significantly affected the development of AI included older age at the time of implantation, female gender, longer duration of LVAD support and destination therapy designation. Freedom from moderate or severe AI was 94%, 76% and 65% of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Overall cohort survival based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 78%, 59% and 42% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. There was no difference in survival between recipients who developed significant AI and those who did not (log-rank test, p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, single-institution study, the overall rate of AI was low, but increased in frequency with longer duration of LVAD support. Although AI development remains a concern for patients on long-term CF-LVAD support, AI development does not appear to impact long-term mortality.
Authors: Lauren K Truby; A Reshad Garan; Raymond C Givens; Brian Wayda; Koji Takeda; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama; Veli K Topkara Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Christina A Theochari; George Michalopoulos; Evangelos K Oikonomou; Stefanos Giannopoulos; Ilias P Doulamis; M Alvarez Villela; Damianos G Kokkinidis Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2018-01
Authors: Julia Riebandt; Anne Schaefer; Dominik Wiedemann; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Günther Laufer; Sigrid Sandner; Daniel Zimpfer Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2021-03
Authors: Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Finn Gustafsson; Binyamin Ben Avraham; Ovidiu Chioncel; Tal Hasin; Avishai Grupper; Aviv Shaul; Sanemn Nalbantgil; Yoav Hammer; Wilfried Mullens; Laurens F Tops; Jeremy Elliston; Steven Tsui; Davor Milicic; Johann Altenberger; Miriam Abuhazira; Stephan Winnik; Jacob Lavee; Massimo Francesco Piepoli; Lorrena Hill; Righab Hamdan; Arjang Ruhparwar; Stefan Anker; Marisa Generosa Crespo-Leiro; Andrew J S Coats; Gerasimos Filippatos; Marco Metra; Giuseppe Rosano; Petar Seferovic; Frank Ruschitzka; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Yaron Barac; Nicolaas De Jonge; Maria Frigerio; Eva Goncalvesova; Israel Gotsman; Osnat Itzhaki Ben Zadok; Piotr Ponikowski; Luciano Potena; Arsen Ristic; Tiny Jaarsma; Tuvia Ben Gal Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-09-28