Literature DB >> 27623090

Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline.

Marije de Groot1, Eline Dancet2,3, Sjoerd Repping2, Mariette Goddijn2, Dominic Stoop4, Fulco van der Veen2, Trudie Gerrits1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Women can now opt to bank their oocytes with the intention of increasing their chances of achieving a pregnancy after their fertility has declined. This exploratory study aimed to gain insight into how women, considering oocyte banking to circumvent age-related fertility decline, perceive this intervention.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in a Dutch university medical center and held in-depth interviews with women on the waiting list for oocyte banking. We recorded the interviews, transcribed them verbatim and used thematic analysis.
RESULTS: All women were financially independent and lived in single-person urban households. They opted for oocyte banking because they wished to share parenthood with a future partner rather than becoming a single parent. This strong desire was key in their interpretation of all aspects of the intervention. Women set aside information about the limited success rates and potential risks, as they were optimistic about their own prognosis, thought that the chances for success were equally likely as the chances it would fail, and because of "anticipatory regret". They perceived oocyte banking as a "helping hand" to achieve shared parenthood. Although women found the costs of the intervention high, they were willing to invest their money to increase their chances for shared parenthood.
CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte banking allows women to circumvent age-related fertility decline. The prospect of potential shared parenthood overrules the perceived health risks and burden. Health professionals should take this into account when informing potential users of oocyte banking.
© 2016 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed motherhood; fertility; oocyte cryopreservation; oocyte freezing; patient-centeredness; social values

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27623090     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  13 in total

1.  Building new approaches to care in Assisted Reproduction: how can we go farther?

Authors:  Maria do Carmo Borges de Souza; Roberto de Azevedo Antunes; Marcelo Marinho de Souza; Marcia Christina Gonçalves Gusmão
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  The emergence of temporality in attitudes towards cryo-fertility: a case study comparing German and Israeli social egg freezing users.

Authors:  Nitzan Rimon-Zarfaty; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.452

3.  Assessing the quality of decision-making for planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha Yee; Carly V Goodman; Vivian Fu; Nechama J Lipton; Michal Dviri; Jordana Mashiach; Clifford L Librach
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Knowledge and attitudes regarding elective oocyte cryopreservation in undergraduate and medical students.

Authors:  Arnold M Mahesan; Seifeldin Sadek; Hadi Ramadan; Silvina Bocca; Anthea B M Paul; Laurel Stadtmauer
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-10

5.  Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Alex Wang; Fekede Asefa Kumsa; Iain Kaan; Zhuoyang Li; Elizabeth Sullivan; Cynthia M Farquhar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Predicting the chance on live birth per cycle at each step of the IVF journey: external validation and update of the van Loendersloot multivariable prognostic model.

Authors:  Johanna Devroe; Karen Peeraer; Geert Verbeke; Carl Spiessens; Joris Vriens; Eline Dancet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Women's viewpoints on egg freezing in Austria: an online Q-methodology study.

Authors:  Johanna Kostenzer; Antoinette de Bont; Job van Exel
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  Social freezing of oocytes: a means to take control of your fertility.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Wennberg
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.384

9.  Decision regret and associated factors following oocyte cryopreservation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or age-related fertility decline.

Authors:  Aysen Gurbuz; Aylin Pelin Cil; Lale Suzan Karakis; Remzi Abali; Mehmet Ceyhan; Ece Aksakal; Azer Kilic; Mustafa Bahceci; Bulent Urman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 10.  Elective egg freezing: what is the vision of women around the globe?

Authors:  Susan Nasab; Lindsey Ulin; Chikara Nkele; Jaimin Shah; Mazen E Abdallah; Baha M Sibai
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.