Literature DB >> 27622009

Correlates of Stillbirths at Nyeri Provincial General Hospital, Kenya, 2009-2013: A Retrospective Study.

Joyce J Cheptum1, Nelly Muiruri2, Ernest Mutua1, Moses Gitonga1, Mwangi Juma2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Death of a baby in-utero is a very devastating event to the mother and the family. Most stillbirths occur during labor and birth with other deaths occurring during the antenatal period. Millions of families experience stillbirths, yet these deaths remain uncounted, and policies have not been clearly stipulated to address this issue. The aim of the study was to identify the possible causes of stillbirths as recorded in the medical records.
METHODS: A retrospective study looking at medical records of women who experienced stillbirths between 1(st) January 2009 and 31(st) December 2013 at Nyeri Provincial General Hospital, Kenya. The hospital records containing cases of stillbirths were retrieved and data abstraction forms were used to collect data and information.
RESULTS: Both fresh and macerated stillbirths were equally common. The stillbirth rate was 12.2 per 1,000 births. There was significant association between stillbirths and the clients who were referred and reason for referral, (p=0.029) and (p=0.005), respectively. The number of ANC visits during pregnancy was also significant (p=0.05). Mode of delivery and the reason for cesarean section were significantly associated with stillbirths, (p=0.003) and (p=0.032), respectively. The type of labor and delivery complications experienced was associated with stillbirths (p= 0.022). CONCLUSION AND GLOBAL HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: There were several factors associated with stillbirths thus efforts should be made to establish approaches aimed at prevention. Addressing the causes of stillbirths will contribute to reduction of perinatal mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery; Kenya; Labor; Medical Records; Nyeri; Referral; Stillbirths

Year:  2016        PMID: 27622009      PMCID: PMC5005984          DOI: 10.21106/ijma.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J MCH AIDS        ISSN: 2161-864X


Background

The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) defines a fetal death as death prior to the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of conception, irrespective of the duration of pregnancy; the death is indicated by the fact that after such separation, the fetus does not breathe or show any other evidence of life, such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles without specification of the duration of pregnancy.[1] Maternal and newborn conditions account for a substantial part of the health gap between the developed and developing countries.[2] In developed countries, the stillbirth rate is around 6 per 1, 000 births; it is about 26 per 1, 000, in less-developed countries; and it is about 31 per 1, 000 births in the least developed countries.[3] Stillbirth may be suspected when the mother ceases to feel fetal movement and the Obstetrician is unable to hear fetal heart tones. Across the globe, around 3 million babies are stillborn every year—more than 8,200 babies a day.[4] Almost half of all stillbirths, or 1.2 million, happen when the woman is in labor. In Africa, a woman has a higher chance, about 24 times more of getting a stillbirth as compared to a woman in a higher income country.[5] According to the World Health Organization (WHO) statistics, the estimated rate of stillbirths in Kenya is 22 per 1000 births.[6] In Uganda, the stillbirth rate is 25 per 1000 births, Ethiopia is also 25 per 1000 while in Nigeria, it is estimated at 42 per 1000.[6] These deaths are directly related to the lack of skilled care at this critical time for mothers and babies.[7] In developing countries, a third of stillbirths are almost always or often blamed on the woman or on evil spirits.[8] Millions of families experience stillbirth, yet these deaths remain uncounted, unsupported, and the solutions understudied.[4] Stillbirths are believed to contribute to the overwhelming majority of perinatal mortality in some developing countries.[9] The major causes of stillbirths include childbirth complications, maternal infections in pregnancy, maternal disorders e.g. hypertension and diabetes, fetal growth restriction and congenital abnormalities.[10] The vast majority of stillbirths are preventable, and simple interventions could lead to healthy infants as a rich reward for the resources invested.[11] Stillbirths were not included in the Millennium Development Goals tracking and remain invisible in global policies with only about 2% of all stillbirths being counted through vital registration and global estimates based on household surveys or modeling.[4,12] Stillbirths have not been as well studied despite the fact that more than 3 million stillbirths occur annually.[13] The need for better data is a pressing issue in stillbirth prevention, where there is a significant gap in translating knowledge into proven strategies to reduce fetal mortality.[14] Knowing the causes of stillbirth is essential when designing interventions.[4] The stillbirth rate is a reflection of health status and policies, socioeconomic indicators related to health and access and adequacy of health care.[15] Central province in Kenya is reported to have the lowest infant mortality rates; however, there are still cases of stillbirths reported despite accessibility to health facilities and health care. This study, therefore, sought to establish the possible causes of stillbirths in Nyeri Provincial General Hospital (PGH), Kenya, through review of medical records.

Methods

This was a retrospective study seeking to review case medical records carried out at Nyeri Provincial General Hospital (PGH) currently referred as Nyeri County and Referral Hospital, Kenya. The research questions were: 1) what are the socio-demographic characteristics of women who experienced stillbirths; 2) what are the possible causes of stillbirths recorded; and finally, 3) which labor complications were associated with stillbirths? Medical records of postnatal women who had stillbirths between 1st January 2009 up to 31st December 2013 were retrieved. Data abstraction forms were used to collect data and information from the medical records. Data was collected on patients’ socio-demographic characteristics, recorded antenatal care services offered, maternal morbidities and stillbirths from the patient case notes. The outcome variable was the stillbirths versus the live births. Completed questionnaires were entered into Stata version 12.0 (College Station, TX). Data was analyzed using Stata version 12.0 and presented in forms of tables and figures. Descriptive statistics were done to describe the study population and percentages were reported. Bivariate analysis was done and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Ethical review was obtained from Kenyatta University Ethical Review Committee (KUERC). A research permit was obtained from the National Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI) and from the hospital management team at Nyeri PGH. Care was taken to ensure that the medical records’ confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.

Results

The total number of deliveries that were recorded in the hospital during the study period were 22,919. A total of 280 maternal record files of women who had experienced both fresh and macerated stillbirths between 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2013 were retrieved. Thus, the stillbirth rate at the hospital was 12.2 per 1,000 births.

Socio-demographic data

Most of the women (80.3%) were aged between 20 – 34 years of age. Majority of them were multiparas (62.7%). On the level of education, most had primary (42.5%) and secondary school education (36.4%). Most of them were married (70.7%). On occupation, 45% of the women were unemployed and only 9.6% had a salaried job (Table 1). In logistic regression, there was no significance between the stillbirths and education level, marital status, occupation and existence of family illness (Table 2).
Table 1

Socio-Demographic and Parity Characteristics of Women in the Study

NumberPercentage
Age group (n=279)

 15-19145.0

 20-249333.3

 25-296824.4

 30-346322.6

 35-393512.5

 40-4551.8

 46-4910.4

Parity

 Primigravida9333.21

 Multipara17662.86

 Grand multipara113.93

Level of education

 None31.07

 Primary11942.50

 Secondary10236.43

 Tertiary3512.50

 Not indicated217.50

Marital status

 Married19870.71

 Single7326.07

 Divorced/separated20.71

 Not indicated72.50

Occupation

 Unemployed12645.00

 Casual job258.93

 Self-employed8128.93

 Salaried job279.64

 Not indicated217.50
Table 2

Association between Stillbirth and Demographic Characteristics of Women in the Study

Odds ratio (OR)zP>z[95% conf. interval]
Age0.99−0.560.5730.9483-1.029

Education level1.100.780.433−0.1615-0.3773

Marital status0.990.240.808−0.3452-0.4431

Occupation0.89−1.120.261−0.2890-0.0784

Family illness1.190.970.330−0.2252-0.6707
Socio-Demographic and Parity Characteristics of Women in the Study Association between Stillbirth and Demographic Characteristics of Women in the Study

Antenatal care (ANC)

Majority of the women who had stillbirths had attended ANC and only 18% had not attended. On the place of ANC attendance, most of the women (68.2%) attended public facilities, 5.4% attended private facilities and others attended other facilities including TBAs. Missing data was 8.6%. Most of the women (76.8%) who had stillbirths did not have any complications during the pregnancy while 22.2% had complications which were pre-eclampsia (34.3%), diabetes mellitus (1.6%), hyperemesis gravidarum (15.6%) and other complications (48.4%). There was no significant association between having a stillbirth and ANC attendance or place that the client attended ANC, however, the number of ANC visits during pregnancy was significant, (p=0.05, 95% CI: -0.657 - 1.265) (Tabel 4).

Referral

The women who were referred were 58.2% while 41.8% were not referred from a health facility. Most of the women (92.1%) were admitted into the hospital before delivery while 7.9% were admitted after delivery. The women were referred from the health centers and dispensaries (22.9%), self- referral from home (22.9%), the private hospitals (4.3%) and other places/locations (7.9%). The commonest reason for referral was reduced or no fetal movement (29.5%) and other reasons (22.9%) (Table 3). On regression analysis, there was significant association between the clients who were referred and reason for referral, (p=0.029, 95% CI -1.789, - 0.10) and (p=0.005, 95% CI: 0.309 - -0.05) respectively. Prevalence and Types of Referral Association between Stillbirth and Referral and Antenatal Care (ANC) Services

Delivery

Most of the women (92.5%) delivered in hospital: 1.8% in the health centers and dispensaries, 4.3% delivered at home, while 1.4% in other places. Gestation at birth was above 36 weeks gestation for 34.6% of the women and for 33.2% of the women gestation was between 33-36 weeks (Table 5). Most of the women (80.7%) had vaginal delivery and 19.3% had caesarean section (C/S). Cephalic presentation was common for both those that had vaginal delivery or C/S. Those that weighed below 2500 g were 56.4%, 29.6% weighing between 2500 – 3500 g and 11.1% weighed over 3500 g at birth. Those who were not weighed were 2.86%. The reasons for C/S included obstructed labor, fetal distress, malpresentation, maternal conditions, fetal abnormalities, and others. On regression analysis, there was significant association between the stillbirths and the reason for cesarean section and the mode of delivery, (p=0.032, 95% CI: 0.012 - 0.272) and (p=0.003, 95% CI: 0.163 - 0.817) respectively (Table 6). There was no association with the gestation at delivery or the presentation at birth. Birth weight was significantly associated with stillbirths, (p=0.037, 95% CI: 1.019 - 1.877). The labor and delivery complications experienced among the women were obstructed labor (6%), eclampsia (8%), fetal distress (21%), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (24%), retained placenta (9%) and other complications accounted for 32% (Figure 1). There was significant association between the stillbirths and the type of labor and delivery complications experienced, (p= 0.022, 95% CI: -0.384 - -0.03) (Table 3).
Table 5

Prevalence and Types of Factors Associated with Delivery

Gestation at delivery (n=280)FrequencyPercentage
Below 24 weeks82.86

24-28 weeks2910.36

29-32 weeks5218.57

33-36 weeks9333.21

Above 36 weeks9734.64

Not indicated10.36

Mode of delivery (n=226)
Table 6

Association between Stillbirth and Factors Related to Delivery

VariableOdds ratio (OR)zP>|z|[95% conf. interval]
Reason for cesarean section0.762.140.0320.0118-0.2717

Place of delivery0.231.040.299−0.2078-0.6759

Gestation1.020.480.632−0.1690-0.2786

Presentation1.41.570.117−0.1008-0.9018

Delivery mode3.032.930.0030.1625-0.8168

Labor complication0.23−2.290.022−0.3836- −0.0298

Birth weight1.382.090.0371.019-1.877
Figure 1

Labor and Delivery Complications

Table 3

Prevalence and Types of Referral

VariableFrequency (n)Percentage
Referral (n=280)

 Yes16358.21

 No11741.79

Reason for referral (n=163)

 Fetal distress1811.04

 Malpresentation169.81

 Reduced/no fetal movements4829.45

 Prolonged labor127.36

 APH169.81

 PET148.59

 Others3722.7

 Not indicated21.2
Prevalence and Types of Factors Associated with Delivery Association between Stillbirth and Factors Related to Delivery Labor and Delivery Complications

Type of stillbirth

Fresh and macerated stillbirths were equally common, 50.5% and 49.5%. Most of the stillbirths (83.6%) did not have any congenital abnormality (Table 7). The presence or the type of congenital abnormality was not significantly associated with stillbirths (Table 8).
Table 7

Prevalence and Types of Stillbirth

VariableFrequencyPercentage
Type of still birth (n=280)

 Macerated Stillbirth (MSB)14150.36

 Fresh Stillbirth (FSB)13849.29

 Twins with FSB and MSB10.36

Congenital abnormality (n=280)

 Yes4616.43

 No23483.57

Type of abnormality (n=43)

 Hydrocephalus511.6

 Anencephaly920.9

 Abdominal abnormalities37

 Others2251.2

 Multiple abnormalities49.3
Table 8

Association between Stillbirth and Congenital Abnormalities

Odds ratiozP>|z|[95% conf. interval]
Congenital abnormality0.64−0.730.4680.18872.1503

Type of abnormality1.040.280.7760.79031.3706
Prevalence and Types of Stillbirth Association between Stillbirth and Congenital Abnormalities Limitation: This was a retrospective study and some information in the files were missing and thus was a limitation for this study.

Discussion

From the study findings, there were factors associated with stillbirths which have policy and practice implications for maternal and child health in the region and the country.

Demographic factors

Most of the women who had stillbirths were aged between 25-34 years old. This is the peak of the women’s reproductive age. The majority of women experiencing stillbirths in this age could be attributed to the fact that most births are occurring during this period. The findings are similar to those from a study in China which found out that most stillbirths occurred between 21-35 years of age.[16] A Nigerian study concluded that teenage pregnancy had more adverse outcomes compared to other age groups.[17] Most of the women were multiparas, having had between 1-4 pregnancies. Nyeri has a low fertility rate according to the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) statistics.[18] Majority of the women who had stillbirths had primary level and secondary level of education. This could be attributed to the proximity and accessibility of schools which could increase the level of education in the County. This could also be attributed to economic empowerment in the region.

Antenatal care

Majority of the women attended ANC, mostly in the public health facilities. This could be attributed to the accessibility of the public health facilities and the cost of treatment as compared to private institutions where the cost can be higher. However, the number of visits attended was not indicated in most of the in-patient’s records. The number of ANC visits attended was significantly associated with stillbirths (p=0.051). Focused ANC aims at comprehensive care during each visit. A woman who attends fewer visits may not benefit from all services that were provided and this may lead to failure to detect complications that may arise during pregnancy. Similar observations were made from a retrospective hospital study in India.[19] Most of the women never had complications during pregnancy. The common complications experienced pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and other complications such as hemorrhage. Complications during pregnancy have been associated with stillbirths. The findings support findings from a hospital based retrospective study carried out at Pravara rural hospital in India which indicated that pregnancy-induced hypertension was the commonest cause of stillbirths. [19] Among the women who experienced stillbirths, 58.2% of them were referred from another health facility; however, 41.8% were self-referrals from home. This may be attributed to knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy, labor and delivery. Significant association was found between referral and the reason for referral, p=0.03 and p=0.01 respectively. Some complications which may arise during pregnancy, labor and delivery such as fetal distress, reduced fetal movements or malpresentations indicate a compromise in the fetal life in utero. This increases the risk of stillbirths especially if the woman is unable to access care immediately. A study in Nigeria found that late referral was a contributor to delivery of stillbirths.[20] Most of the women delivered in hospital above 36 weeks gestation and others between 33-36 weeks. A study assessing the risk of stillbirths and gestational age had similar findings indicating that the risk of stillbirths increased with gestational age.[21] However, the findings of this study differed with findings from a review of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in six developing countries, namely, Argentina, Egypt, India, Peru, South Africa and Vietnam which found that prematurity was the commonest cause.[14] Vaginal delivery was the commonest mode of delivery. For those that had cesarean section (C/S), the reasons for C/S included obstructed labor, fetal distress, and others. The reason for C/S and the baby’s birth weight were significantly associated with stillbirths. A study in Ghana found that the highest risk for stillbirths was during labor and delivery.[22] Both fresh and macerated stillbirths were commonly experienced unlike a study in Nigeria which found that macerated stillbirths were common. [20] Most of them did not have a congenital abnormality.

Conclusion and Global Health Implications

Stillbirths are caused by multiple factors ranging from antenatal, referral and delivery factors. More efforts should be focused on minimizing stillbirths by designing preventive strategies at antenatal care and delivery. The health facility staff from peripheral facilities should be empowered on how to handle complications in order to minimize stillbirths arising from referrals. Most of the women who had stillbirths were aged between 20-34 years old. The number of ANC visits was significantly associated with stillbirths. Reason for caesarean sections and the baby’s birth weight contributed to stillbirths. Complications during pregnancy were not associated with pregnancy; however, referral from another facility and the reason for referral were associated with stillbirths.
Table 4

Association between Stillbirth and Referral and Antenatal Care (ANC) Services

Odds ratio (OR)zP>|z|[95% conf. interval]
Referral−0.87−2.180.029−1.789-0.0947

Place of referral−0.06−0.460.648−0.2241-0.1394

Reason for referral−0.14−2.800.005−0.3087- −0.0542

ANC attendance0.280.620.535−0.6572-1.265

Visits0.161.920.0230212-0.2931

Place of ANC attended−0.06−0.260.791−0.231-0.1762

ANC complication1.540.520.024−0.417-0.7202

Type of complication0.42.190.0290.0422-0.7706
  9 in total

1.  Preventing those so-called stillbirths.

Authors:  Jonathan M Spector; Subhash Daga
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Stillbirths: why they matter.

Authors:  J Frederik Frøen; Joanne Cacciatore; Elizabeth M McClure; Oluwafemi Kuti; Abdul Hakeem Jokhio; Monir Islam; Jeremy Shiffman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Hannah Blencowe; Robert Pattinson; Simon Cousens; Rajesh Kumar; Ibinabo Ibiebele; Jason Gardosi; Louise T Day; Cynthia Stanton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Causes of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths: data from 7993 pregnancies in six developing countries.

Authors:  Nhu Thi Nguyen Ngoc; Mario Merialdi; Hany Abdel-Aleem; Guillermo Carroli; Manorama Purwar; Nelly Zavaleta; Liana Campódonico; Mohamed M Ali; G Justus Hofmeyr; Matthews Mathai; Ornella Lincetto; José Villar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data.

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Michael G Gravett; Toni M Nunes; Craig E Rubens; Cynthia Stanton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Aetiology of stillbirths and neonatal deaths in rural Ghana: implications for health programming in developing countries.

Authors:  Karen M Edmond; Maria A Quigley; Charles Zandoh; Samuel Danso; Chris Hurt; Seth Owusu Agyei; Betty R Kirkwood
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age.

Authors:  Melissa G Rosenstein; Yvonne W Cheng; Jonathan M Snowden; James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Rachel A Haws; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Stillbirth rate in a teaching hospital in South-eastern Nigeria: a silent tragedy.

Authors:  C Okeudo; Bu Ezem; Ee Ojiyi
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2012-07
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Maternal and foetal medical conditions during pregnancy as determinants of intrapartum stillbirth in public health facilities of Addis Ababa: a case-control study.

Authors:  Alemayehu Gebremariam Agena; Lebitsi Maud Modiba
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2019-05-14

2.  Prevalence and maternal socio-demographic factors associated with stillbirth in health facilities in Anambra, South-East Nigeria.

Authors:  Nonye E Anyichie; Evelyn N Nwagu
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.927

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.