Literature DB >> 27621948

Mechanical Solitaire Thrombectomy with Low-Dose Booster Tirofiban Injection.

Duck-Ho Goh1, Sung-Chul Jin2, Hae Woong Jeong3, Sam Yeol Ha4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy using a Solitaire stent has been associated with a high recanalization rate and favorable clinical outcome in intra-arterial thrombolysis. To achieve a higher recanalization rate for mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy, we used an intra-arterial low-dose booster tirofiban injection into the occluded segment after stent deployment. We report the safety and recanalization rates for mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with a low-dose booster tirofiban injection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February and March 2013, 13 consecutive patients underwent mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection. The occlusion sites included the proximal middle cerebral artery (5 patients), the internal carotid artery (5 patients), the top of the basilar artery (2 patients) and the distal middle cerebral artery (M2 segment, 1 patient). Six patients underwent bridge treatment, including intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Tirofiban of 250 µg was used in all patients except one (500 µg). All occluded vessels were recanalized after 3 attempts at stent retrieval (1 time, n=9; 2 times, n=2; 3 times, n=2).
RESULTS: Successful recanalization was achieved in all patients (TICI 3, n=8; TICI 2b, n=5). Procedural complications developed in 3 patients (subarachnoid hemorrhage, n=2; hemorrhagic transformation, n=1). Mortality occurred in one patient with a basilar artery occlusion due to reperfusion brain swelling after mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection. Favorable clinical outcome (mRS≤2) was observed in 8 patients (61.5%).
CONCLUSION: Our modified mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy method using a low-dose booster tirofiban injection might enhance the recanalization rate with no additive hemorrhagic complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical thrombectomy; Solitaire stent; Tirofiban

Year:  2016        PMID: 27621948      PMCID: PMC5018547          DOI: 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurointervention        ISSN: 2093-9043


Mechanical thrombectomy using stent devices has been considered as a standard treatment modality due to its favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by intracranial large vessel occlusion [12]. However, despite the learning curve for the Solitaire stent, our experiences with mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire stent have resulted in a lower recanalization rate than previously reported [234]. Tirofiban is a relatively short-acting and reversible glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor and has been increasingly used in the treatment of acute thromboembolism caused by a coiling procedure or salvage treatment of acute ischemic stroke refractory to using conventional techniques [56]. In a previous trial, we combined tirofiban injection (dosage, 0~800 µg) with ballooning for the treatment of an acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. No procedure-related hemorrhage or hemorrhagic transformation was observed after intra-arterial thrombolysis using low-dose tirofiban injection, consistent with previous reports [78]. Unless the incidence of procedure-related hemorrhage increases, we propose that a low-dose booster tirofiban injection will accelerate thrombolysis in the occluded vessel under deployment of a stent, temporarily maintaining antegrade flow of the occluded vessel. We modified the procedure for mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy in the following ways: 1) intra-arterial low-dose booster tirofiban (250 µg) injection after Solitaire stent was deployed in the occluded vessel; 2) serial control angiograms were conducted to evaluate current blood flow status in the treated occluded vessel using 2-minute intervals; and 3) the deployed stent was retrieved when serial angiograms showed no antegrade flow of the occluded vessel or at 10 minutes after the deployment of the stent in cases of maintained blood flow in the occluded vessels. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection.

METHODS

Patients

We performed mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection in 13 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by intracranial large vessel occlusion from February 2013 to March 2013. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Stroke neurologists performed neurological assessments based on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score. Most patients underwent a non-enhanced brain CT, CT angiography, CT perfusion, and brain MRI. The brain MRI protocol included diffusion-weighted imaging, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence, and T2 gradient-recall echo imaging. Mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection was generally performed in patients arriving within 8 hours of symptom onset who had a NIHSS ≥ 4. Intracranial hemorrhage was ruled out using plain CT in patients with neurological deficits. Subsequently, large vessel occlusion and the status of perfusion/diffusion mismatch were confirmed using CT angiography with perfusion and MR diffusion imaging. Exceptionally, patients with NIHSS < 4 were considered for treatment in cases of fluctuating or progressive neurological deficits. Patients beyond a time window of 8 hours were considered for treatment in cases of remarkable perfusion/diffusion mismatch lesions, suggesting a relevant proportion of penumbra or a salvage procedure to avoid decompressive craniectomy. Patients with perfusion/diffusion-matched lesions were considered for treatment restrictively within 3 hours of symptom onset and a NIHSS >10. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (dose; 0.6 mg/kg) was administered before the procedure as a bridge therapy if patients with acute ischemic attack generally met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of intravenous thrombolysis. The functional outcome was assessed based on the NIHSS at 1 week after procedure and the modified Rankin scale at 3 months after discharge.

Endovascular treatment technique

An interventional neurosurgeon, with experience of operating on more than 600 interventional procedures, performed all endovascular treatments under the informed consent of patients or the patients' families. All patients were treated under local anesthesia with sedative agents. A 6F Envoy guiding catheter (Codman, Raynham, MA) coaxially introduced into a 6F shuttle catheter (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN) was placed in the internal carotid or vertebral artery. The guiding catheters were flushed continuously with heparinized saline (5000 U/liter). In all patients, mechanical thrombectomy was performed using a Solitaire stent of 6mm in diameter and 30 mm in length. An Excelsior xt 27 microcatheter (Stryker, Fremont, California) was navigated distal to the thrombus over a Synchro 0.014 microwire (Stryker, Fremont, California) and positioned approximately 1.5 cm distal to the thrombus under conf irmation of contrast injection. The Solitaire stent (ev3 Inc., Irvine, California) was subsequently advanced to the distal tip of the microcatheter and fully deployed across the thrombotic lesion. A control angiogram was used to evaluate the recanalization status of the thrombotic lesion after stent deployment. Intermittent hand injections of intra-arterial tirofiban (typical dose: 250 µg, 50 µg at a time) without a loading dose were performed through the delivery microcatheter. Control angiograms were repeatedly performed using 2-minute intervals to assess the progression of the thrombotic lesion across which the stent was deployed. If the control angiograms showed no antegrade flow of the thrombotic lesion or at 10 minutes after stent deployment in cases of maintained blood flow, the partial re-sheathed Solitaire stent and the delivery microcatheter were removed as a system until the unsheathed Solitaire stent was positioned in the distal tip of the guiding catheter. Thereafter, the partial re-sheathed Solitaire stent, delivery microcatheter, and guiding catheter were withdrawn through the shuttle catheter, while applying no flushing of the heparinized saline into the guiding and shuttle catheters. A control angiogram was performed to assess recanalization after the retrieval of the stent system. The recanalization status was assessed in the final angiogram and classif ied according to the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) scale.9 Successful recanalization was defined as a TICI grade of 2b or 3. The entire procedural steps were repeated (a maximum of 3 times) until recanalization was achieved, as defined by successful recanalization (TICI grade ≥ 2b), and a maximum dose of 500 µg of tirofiban was injected. No subsequent additional procedures were performed. All patients underwent non-enhanced CT scans immediately after, and 24 hours after the procedure to investigate possible hemorrhagic complications. Hemorrhagic transformations were categorized and described as per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria [10].

RESULTS

The admission NIHSS score ranged from 4 to 19 (median; 15) (Table 1). The occlusion sites were internal carotid artery (ICA) (n=3), T-bifurcation of ICA (n=2), the M1 segment of middle cerebral artery (n=5), the M2 segment of middle cerebral artery (n=1), and the basilar artery (n=2).
Table 1

Baseline Clinical and Procedural Characteristics in 13 Patients Who Underwent Mechanical Solitaire Thrombectomy with Low Dose Booster Injection of Tirofiban

Patient No.Age in yearsSexOcclusion siteIV tPATirofiban Dose (µg)Characteristics of the repeated angiogramsFrequency of stent retrievalTICIProcedural complications
153MTNo500Maintained flow13No
253MBasilar arteryNo250Decreased flow12bNo
354MM1No250Decreased flow23No
477MM1No250Maintained flow13No
566FBasilar arteryNo250Maintained flow13No
659MTYes250Decreased flow32bNo
758MM1Yes250Maintained flow13SAH
849FM2No250Maintained flow12bSAH
945FM1Yes250Maintained flow13No
1080FM1Yes250Decreased flow13No
1169MICAYes250Maintained flow13No
1279FICANo250Maintained flow*32bTransformation
1363MICAYes250Decreased flow22bNo

M indicates male; F, female; T, bifurcation of internal carotid artery; M1, pre-bifurcation segment of middle cerebral artery; M2, insular segment of middle cerebral artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; and *, repeated control angiograms showed maintained blood flow when the Solitaire stent deployed the occluded lesion after the third time.

An amount of 250 µg of tirofiban was used in all patients except one (500 µg). Repeated control angiograms after stent deployment showed maintained blood flow during 10 minutes in 8 lesions (61.5%) (Fig. 1). Stent retrieval was required one time in 7 of these 8 lesions. Five lesions showed non-visualization or decreased blood flow in repeated angiogram, and 3 lesions (2 lesions; 2 times, 1 lesion; 3 times) required more than one attempt at stent retrieval in the 5 lesions. The overall frequency of Solitaire stent retrieval included one time in 9 lesions (69.2%), two times in 2 lesions (15.4%), and three times in 2 lesions (15.4%). The occlusion sites requiring more than one attempt at Solitaire stent retrieval were ICA (n=2), T-bifurcation of ICA (n=1), and the M1 segment of MCA (n=1).
Fig. 1

Conventional angiograms from a 58-year-old man with a proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion (Case No.7).

A. Conventional angiogram shows left proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions. B and C. Serial repeated control angiogram showed no decrease in contrast filling of the occluded segment after solitaire stent deployment. D. Final control angiogram showed complete recanalization of the occluded segment after first retrieval of the solitaire stent.

Successful recanalization was achieved for all lesions (TICI 3; n=8, TICI 2b; n=5). Three procedural complications (23.1%) developed, which included subarachnoid hemorrhage in 2 lesions (15.4%) and hemorrhagic transformation in 1 lesion (7.7%). In the current study, repeated angiograms showed that no vessel perforations or arterial dissections occurred during the procedure for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Two patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage suffered no neurological deterioration after the procedure, and no concomitant parenchymal or intraventricular hemorrhage was observed. All 2 subarachnoid hemorrhages disappeared on the 24-hour follow-up CT scan. One patient with an ICA occlusion beyond the time window of 8 hours showed one-fourth mismatched MCA territory on blood flow and blood volume maps of perfusion CT. This patient was expected to undergo decompressive craniectomy. Therefore, we decided to perform mechanical solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection to have the possibility of avoiding decompressive craniectomy. Mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy with low-dose booster tirofiban injection resulted in near complete recanalization (TICI 2b), but hemorrhagic transformation (parenchymal hematoma, type 1) in the affected territory on brain CT was observed after the procedure. The patient underwent decompressive craniectomy to control increased intracranial pressure and remained in a severe disabled state 3 months after the procedure. A total of 8 patients (61.5%) recovered with good clinical outcomes (mRS≤2). Mortality occurred in the one patient with a basilar artery occlusion (7.7%) due to reperfusion brain swelling and brainstem compression.

DISCUSSIONS

Because of the high recanalization rate and favorable clinical outcome, mechanical thrombectomy using stent devices has been regarded as the current standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by embolic occlusion [12]. However, because repeated control angiograms are not routinely performed after stent deployment, the conventional mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy method does not reveal the current status of the occluded lesion after stent deployment. In addition, the timing of stent retrieval varies according to the operators. Repeated control angiograms will be informative as to the current status of the occluded lesion and the timing of the stent retrieval. If the repeated control angiogram shows no decrease or gradual increase of contrast f illing in the stent deployed across the occluded lesion, the timing of solitaire stent retrieval might not be critical because blood flow will continuously supply the occluded lesion by the deployed stent and thrombolysis of endogenous tissue plasminogen activator will be enhanced through the patent lumen of the stent deployed across the occluded lesion. In the present study, repeated control angiograms revealed maintained blood flow in 8 lesions (61.5%) and stent retrieval was required one time in 7 of these 8 patients. The patient with ICA occlusion required stent retrieval three times and showed maintained blood flow when the Solitaire stent was deployed to the occluded lesion after the third time. All lesions that showed maintained blood flow did not require additional stent retrieval. Maintained blood flow on repeated control angiograms suggested that recanalization would be high after stent retrieval. If the repeated control angiogram showed non-visualization or decreased blood flow, the time delay of the stent retrieval might not be benef icial because thrombolysis of the endogenous tissue plasminogen activator would not be expected in the occluded lesion. In 3 of 5 lesions, non-visualization or decreased blood flow in repeated angiograms required more than one attempt at stent retrieval. Non-visualization or decreased blood flow on the repeated control angiogram might indicate a necessity of more than one time for stent retrieval, as the thrombus is difficult to withdraw as one piece without breakdown during stent retrieval. A low-dose injection of tirof iban (up to 800 µg) showed no additive bleeding risk in the treatment of the occluded segment, according to our unpublished data and previous reports [78]. Alternatively, tirofiban infusion for the treatment of refractory occluded lesions showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes [611]. Unlike the conventional Solitaire thrombectomy method, with no booster tirof iban injection, the low-dose booster tirofiban injection (up to 500 µg) might enhance the progression of thrombolysis and reduce the distal migration of the thrombus during solitaire stent retrieval, as tirofiban might resolve a secondary thrombus mainly composed of platelets resulting from the propagation of the primary thrombus in the initial occluded cerebral artery. Except for a small number of cases, the results obtained in the present study showed no distal migration of thrombus and successful recanalization of all lesions. These results might support the beneficial effects of low-dose booster tirofiban injection. Selection bias was unavoidably included in the present study, as this study was a small-numbered retrospective analysis. However, the present study might not represent the easiness of thrombectomy because these studies included occlusion lesions of ICA or T-bifurcation in 5 lesions (38.5%), which were difficult to recanalize after thrombolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified mechanical Solitaire thrombectomy method using low-dose booster tirofiban injection might enhance the recanalization rate with no additive hemorrhagic complications.
  11 in total

1.  Mechanical thrombectomy with a self-expanding retrievable intracranial stent (Solitaire AB): experience in 26 patients with acute cerebral artery occlusion.

Authors:  F Miteff; K C Faulder; A C C Goh; B S Steinfort; C Sue; T J Harrington
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Intra-arterial adjuvant tirofiban after unsuccessful intra-arterial thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke: preliminary experience in 16 patients.

Authors:  Jee-Hyun Kwon; Shang Hun Shin; Young Cheol Weon; Jae Cheol Hwang; Seung Kug Baik
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial.

Authors:  Raul G Nogueira; Helmi L Lutsep; Rishi Gupta; Tudor G Jovin; Gregory W Albers; Gary A Walker; David S Liebeskind; Wade S Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver; Reza Jahan; Elad I Levy; Tudor G Jovin; Blaise Baxter; Raul G Nogueira; Wayne Clark; Ronald Budzik; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Intra-arterial tirofiban infusion for partial recanalization with stagnant flow in hyperacute cerebral ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Seung Kug Baik; S J Oh; K-P Park; J-H Lee
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: asymptomatic or symptomatic?

Authors:  C Berger; M Fiorelli; T Steiner; W R Schäbitz; L Bozzao; E Bluhmki; W Hacke; R von Kummer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Noser; Hashem M Shaltoni; Christiana E Hall; Andrei V Alexandrov; Zsolt Garami; Edwin D Cacayorin; Joon K Song; James C Grotta; Morgan S Campbell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Endovascular treatment of acute intracerebral artery occlusions with the solitaire stent: single-centre experience with 108 recanalization procedures.

Authors:  F Dorn; S Stehle; H Lockau; C Zimmer; T Liebig
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 9.  Platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in human ischemic brain disease.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Seitz; Mario Siebler
Journal:  Curr Vasc Pharmacol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.719

10.  Intra-arterial infusion of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist for the treatment of thromboembolism during coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm: a comparison of abciximab and tirofiban.

Authors:  H W Jeong; S-C Jin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Challenges to Procedural Success.

Authors:  Albert J Yoo; Tommy Andersson
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

Review 2.  Causes and Solutions of Endovascular Treatment Failure.

Authors:  Byung Moon Kim
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

3.  Effects of Periprocedural Tirofiban vs. Oral Antiplatelet Drug Therapy on Posterior Circulation Infarction in Patients With Acute Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion.

Authors:  Xuan Sun; Huijun Zhang; Xu Tong; Feng Gao; Gaoting Ma; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Safety and efficacy of prophylactic tirofiban infusion for acute intracranial intraprocedural stent thrombosis.

Authors:  Lili Sun; Jinping Zhang; Yun Song; Wei Zhao; Meimei Zheng; Jun Zhang; Hao Yin; Wei Wang; Yao Meng; Ju Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Safety of Intra-arterial Tirofiban during Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous Thrombolysis.

Authors:  S H Jang; S-I Sohn; H Park; S-J Lee; Y-W Kim; J M Hong; C-H Kim; J W Choi; D-H Kang; Y-S Kim; Y-H Hwang; J S Lee; J-H Hong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.966

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.