Literature DB >> 27621770

Chromatin boundary elements organize genomic architecture and developmental gene regulation in Drosophila Hox clusters.

Zhibo Ma1, Mo Li1, Sharmila Roy1, Kevin J Liu1, Matthew L Romine1, Derrick C Lane1, Sapna K Patel1, Haini N Cai1.   

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3D) organization of the eukaryotic genome is critical for its proper function. Evidence suggests that extensive chromatin loops form the building blocks of the genomic architecture, separating genes and gene clusters into distinct functional domains. These loops are anchored in part by a special type of DNA elements called chromatin boundary elements (CBEs). CBEs were originally found to insulate neighboring genes by blocking influences of transcriptional enhancers or the spread of silent chromatin. However, recent results show that chromatin loops can also play a positive role in gene regulation by looping out intervening DNA and "delivering" remote enhancers to gene promoters. In addition, studies from human and model organisms indicate that the configuration of chromatin loops, many of which are tethered by CBEs, is dynamically regulated during cell differentiation. In particular, a recent work by Li et al has shown that the SF1 boundary, located in the Drosophila Hox cluster, regulates local genes by tethering different subsets of chromatin loops: One subset enclose a neighboring gene ftz, limiting its access by the surrounding Scr enhancers and restrict the spread of repressive histones during early embryogenesis; and the other loops subdivide the Scr regulatory region into independent domains of enhancer accessibility. The enhancer-blocking activity of these CBE elements varies greatly in strength and tissue distribution. Further, tandem pairing of SF1 and SF2 facilitate the bypass of distal enhancers in transgenic flies, providing a mechanism for endogenous enhancers to circumvent genomic interruptions resulting from chromosomal rearrangement. This study demonstrates how a network of chromatin boundaries, centrally organized by SF1, can remodel the 3D genome to facilitate gene regulation during development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTCF; Chromatin boundary element; Chromatin loop domains; Drosophila; Hox genes; Insulator

Year:  2016        PMID: 27621770      PMCID: PMC4997523          DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v7.i3.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Biol Chem        ISSN: 1949-8454


  79 in total

1.  The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators.

Authors:  A C Bell; A G West; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements.

Authors:  Josée Dostie; Todd A Richmond; Ramy A Arnaout; Rebecca R Selzer; William L Lee; Tracey A Honan; Eric D Rubio; Anton Krumm; Justin Lamb; Chad Nusbaum; Roland D Green; Job Dekker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Genome wide ChIP-chip analyses reveal important roles for CTCF in Drosophila genome organization.

Authors:  Sheryl T Smith; Priyankara Wickramasinghe; Andrew Olson; Dmitri Loukinov; Lan Lin; Joy Deng; Yanping Xiong; John Rux; Ravi Sachidanandam; Hao Sun; Victor Lobanenkov; Jumin Zhou
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains.

Authors:  R Kellum; P Schedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Loss of insulator activity by paired Su(Hw) chromatin insulators.

Authors:  E Muravyova; A Golovnin; E Gracheva; A Parshikov; T Belenkaya; V Pirrotta; P Georgiev
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Dynamic changes in the genomic localization of DNA replication-related element binding factor during the cell cycle.

Authors:  B V Gurudatta; Jingping Yang; Kevin Van Bortle; Paul G Donlin-Asp; Victor G Corces
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Fab-7 functions as a chromatin domain boundary to ensure proper segment specification by the Drosophila bithorax complex.

Authors:  K Hagstrom; M Muller; P Schedl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Genetic analysis of embryonic cis-acting regulatory elements of the Drosophila homeotic gene sex combs reduced.

Authors:  M J Gorman; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genomic context modulates insulator activity through promoter competition.

Authors:  H N Cai; Z Zhang; J R Adams; P Shen
Journal:  Development       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Drosophila CTCF tandemly aligns with other insulator proteins at the borders of H3K27me3 domains.

Authors:  Kevin Van Bortle; Edward Ramos; Naomi Takenaka; Jingping Yang; Jessica E Wahi; Victor G Corces
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  4 in total

1.  Transcriptome comparison identifies potential biomarkers of spine and skull base chordomas.

Authors:  Achim H Bell; Franco DeMonte; Shaan M Raza; Laurence D Rhines; Claudio E Tatsui; Victor G Prieto; Gregory N Fuller; Diana Bell
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  The BEN Domain Protein Insensitive Binds to the Fab-7 Chromatin Boundary To Establish Proper Segmental Identity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Anna Fedotova; Tsutomu Aoki; Mikaël Rossier; Rakesh Kumar Mishra; Chaevia Clendinen; Olga Kyrchanova; Daniel Wolle; Artem Bonchuk; Robert K Maeda; Annick Mutero; Fabienne Cleard; Vladic Mogila; François Karch; Pavel Georgiev; Paul Schedl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Chromatin dynamics and the transcriptional competence of HSV-1 genomes during lytic infections.

Authors:  MiYao Hu; Daniel P Depledge; Esteban Flores Cortes; Judith Breuer; Luis M Schang
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 4.  Insulators in Plants: Progress and Open Questions.

Authors:  Amina Kurbidaeva; Michael Purugganan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.