Darrin Majors1, Patrick Ellis1. 1. Pharmacy Department, Memorial Health Care System, Chattanooga, Tennessee. Corresponding author: Darrin Majors, PharmD, BCPS , 2525 deSales Avenue, Chattanooga, TN 37404; phone: 423-495-8380 ; fax: 423-495-6703; e-mail: darrin_majors@memorial.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently there are no universally accepted approaches for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) following the initial infection. Several studies have identified common risk factors for the emergence of recurrent CDI. Identifying patients at high risk for recurrent CDI through the assessment of risk factors at initial diagnosis could enable health care providers to optimize available treatment options. A vancomycin hydrochloride-tapered regimen may be an effective treatment option for the prevention of recurrent CDI following the initial infection. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective study, we examined the efficacy of orally administered vancomycin-tapered regimens for the prevention of recurrent CDI in high-risk patients. High-risk patients were identified using patient risk factors found in a retrospective chart review. The primary objective was to decrease hospital readmissions for recurrent CDI. The secondary objective was to improve the discharge coordination-of-care process by providing a pharmacy benefits evaluation, which ensured vancomycin affordability and assistance in prescription attainment, and discharge counseling. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients enrolled in the study, 5 experienced recurrent CDI (6%). Memorial Health Care System's (Chattanooga, Tennessee) historical recurrent CDI rate was 8.2%. Thirty-one of the 83 patients received a vancomycin-tapered regimen following their initial infection (37%). A pharmacy benefits evaluation was performed on 35 of the 57 patients who were discharged home on vancomycin (61%). CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin-tapered regimens may provide a cost-effective method for the prevention of recurrent CDI following an initial infection in patients at high risk for recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Currently there are no universally accepted approaches for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficileinfections (CDI) following the initial infection. Several studies have identified common risk factors for the emergence of recurrent CDI. Identifying patients at high risk for recurrent CDI through the assessment of risk factors at initial diagnosis could enable health care providers to optimize available treatment options. A vancomycin hydrochloride-tapered regimen may be an effective treatment option for the prevention of recurrent CDI following the initial infection. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective study, we examined the efficacy of orally administered vancomycin-tapered regimens for the prevention of recurrent CDI in high-risk patients. High-risk patients were identified using patient risk factors found in a retrospective chart review. The primary objective was to decrease hospital readmissions for recurrent CDI. The secondary objective was to improve the discharge coordination-of-care process by providing a pharmacy benefits evaluation, which ensured vancomycin affordability and assistance in prescription attainment, and discharge counseling. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients enrolled in the study, 5 experienced recurrent CDI (6%). Memorial Health Care System's (Chattanooga, Tennessee) historical recurrent CDI rate was 8.2%. Thirty-one of the 83 patients received a vancomycin-tapered regimen following their initial infection (37%). A pharmacy benefits evaluation was performed on 35 of the 57 patients who were discharged home on vancomycin (61%). CONCLUSIONS:Vancomycin-tapered regimens may provide a cost-effective method for the prevention of recurrent CDI following an initial infection in patients at high risk for recurrence.
Authors: Dimitri M Drekonja; William H Amundson; Douglas D Decarolis; Michael A Kuskowski; Frank A Lederle; James R Johnson Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Mary Y Hu; Kianoosh Katchar; Lorraine Kyne; Seema Maroo; Sanjeev Tummala; Valley Dreisbach; Hua Xu; Daniel A Leffler; Ciarán P Kelly Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ilan Youngster; Jenny Sauk; Christina Pindar; Robin G Wilson; Jess L Kaplan; Mark B Smith; Eric J Alm; Dirk Gevers; George H Russell; Elizabeth L Hohmann Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Christina M Surawicz; Lawrence J Brandt; David G Binion; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Scott R Curry; Peter H Gilligan; Lynne V McFarland; Mark Mellow; Brian S Zuckerbraun Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Isaac See; Yi Mu; Jessica Cohen; Zintars G Beldavs; Lisa G Winston; Ghinwa Dumyati; Stacy Holzbauer; John Dunn; Monica M Farley; Carol Lyons; Helen Johnston; Erin Phipps; Rebecca Perlmutter; Lydia Anderson; Dale N Gerding; Fernanda C Lessa Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jane W Marsh; Rangolee Arora; Jessica L Schlackman; Kathleen A Shutt; Scott R Curry; Lee H Harrison Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Oliver A Cornely; Derrick W Crook; Roberto Esposito; André Poirier; Michael S Somero; Karl Weiss; Pamela Sears; Sherwood Gorbach Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: David W Eyre; A Sarah Walker; David Wyllie; Kate E Dingle; David Griffiths; John Finney; Lily O'Connor; Alison Vaughan; Derrick W Crook; Mark H Wilcox; Timothy E A Peto Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Judong Shen; Devan V Mehrotra; Mary Beth Dorr; Zhen Zeng; Junhua Li; Xun Xu; David Nickle; Emily R Holzinger; Aparna Chhibber; Mark H Wilcox; Rebecca L Blanchard; Peter M Shaw Journal: mSphere Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 4.389