Soomi Lee1, Rachel E Koffer2, Briana N Sprague2, Susan T Charles3, Nilam Ram2,4, David M Almeida2. 1. Department of Biobehavioral Health, University Park. 2. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park. 3. Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine. 4. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined age-related cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between activity diversity and four dimensions of well-being: psychological well-being, depression, positive affect, and negative affect. Method: Activity diversity was defined as the breadth and evenness of participation in seven daily activities including paid work, time with children, doing chores, leisure, physical activities, formal volunteering, and giving informal help to others. Participants from the National Survey of Daily Experiences (N = 793, Mage = 46.71, SDag = 12.48) provided data during two 8-day measurement bursts approximately 10 years apart. Results: Older adults (age = 60-74 years) who engaged in more diverse activities reported higher psychological well-being than older adults who engaged in less diverse activities; an association not significant among middle-aged adults (age = 35-59 years), and in the opposite direction for younger individuals (age = 24-34 years). Longitudinally, increased activity diversity over 10 years was marginally associated with increases in positive affect. Compared with younger individuals who increased activity diversity, older adults who increased activity diversity reported smaller decreases in psychological well-being, greater increases in positive affect, and greater decreases in negative affect. Discussion: Our findings suggest that activity diversity may play an important role in older adults' concurrent well-being and also in their long-term longitudinal improvements of well-being.
Objectives: This study examined age-related cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between activity diversity and four dimensions of well-being: psychological well-being, depression, positive affect, and negative affect. Method: Activity diversity was defined as the breadth and evenness of participation in seven daily activities including paid work, time with children, doing chores, leisure, physical activities, formal volunteering, and giving informal help to others. Participants from the National Survey of Daily Experiences (N = 793, Mage = 46.71, SDag = 12.48) provided data during two 8-day measurement bursts approximately 10 years apart. Results: Older adults (age = 60-74 years) who engaged in more diverse activities reported higher psychological well-being than older adults who engaged in less diverse activities; an association not significant among middle-aged adults (age = 35-59 years), and in the opposite direction for younger individuals (age = 24-34 years). Longitudinally, increased activity diversity over 10 years was marginally associated with increases in positive affect. Compared with younger individuals who increased activity diversity, older adults who increased activity diversity reported smaller decreases in psychological well-being, greater increases in positive affect, and greater decreases in negative affect. Discussion: Our findings suggest that activity diversity may play an important role in older adults' concurrent well-being and also in their long-term longitudinal improvements of well-being.
Authors: Susan T Charles; Jennifer R Piazza; Jacqueline A Mogle; Emily J Urban; Martin J Sliwinski; David M Almeida Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2015-03-08 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Kristin R Krueger; Robert S Wilson; Julia M Kamenetsky; Lisa L Barnes; Julia L Bienias; David A Bennett Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2009 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Emily J Urban-Wojcik; Soomi Lee; Daniel W Grupe; Laurel Quinlan; Lauren Gresham; Angel Hammond; Susan T Charles; Margie E Lachman; David M Almeida; Richard J Davidson; Stacey M Schaefer Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Soomi Lee; Emily J Urban-Wojcik; Susan T Charles; David M Almeida Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.942