Literature DB >> 27621194

3 to 5 Years Later: Long-term Effects of Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingectomy on Ovarian Function.

Roberta Venturella1, Daniela Lico2, Massimo Borelli3, Maria G Imbrogno2, Gabriele Cevenini4, Errico Zupi5, Fulvio Zullo2, Michele Morelli2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Preliminary data on the effects of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS) show that postoperative ovarian function is preserved up to 3 months after surgery. The confirmation of PBS safety on ovarian function even many years after surgery is essential to reassure the medical community that this new strategy, recently proposed for the prevention of ovarian cancer, is at least able to avoid the risk of premature surgical menopause. We investigated whether the addition of PBS during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) causes long-term effects on ovarian function.
DESIGN: An observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Magna Graecia" University, Catanzaro, Italy. PATIENTS: Seventy-nine patients who underwent TLH plus salpingectomy between September 2010 and September 2012 at our institution have been recalled to be submitted to ovarian reserve evaluation in February 2015. Eight of 79 women refused to participate in this follow-up study.
INTERVENTIONS: The ovarian age of PBS patients has been determined through OvAge (OvAge sr., Catanzaro, Italy), a statistical model that combines antimüllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, 3-dimensional antral follicle count, vascular index, flow index, and vascular flow index values. The control group consisted of a large population of 652 healthy women (with intact uterus and adnexa) previously enrolled to build the OvAge model. Comparisons between ovarian ages of PBS patients and the control group have been assessed by analysis of covariance linear statistical modeling.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measurement was the differences in the behavior within OvAge/age relation between PBS and control women. Descriptive statistics of those 71 enrolled PBS patients are the following: age, 49.61 ± 2.15 years; OvAge, 49.22 ± 2.57 years; follicle-stimulating hormone, 43.02 ± 19.92 mU/mL; antimüllerian hormone, 0.12 ± 0.20 ng/mL; 3-dimensional antral follicle count, 1.91 ± 1.28; vascular index, 2.80% ± 5.32%; flow index, 19.37 ± 5.88; and vascular flow index, 0.56 ± 1.12. Analysis of covariance disclosed that PBS and control women do not exhibit different behaviors (p = .900) within OvAge/age relation.
CONCLUSION: According to our model, the addition of PBS to TLH in the late reproductive years does not modify the ovarian age of treated women up to 3 to 5 years after surgery.
Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer prevention; Long-term follow-up; Ovarian cancer; Ovarian reserve; Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy; Salpingectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27621194     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  12 in total

1.  Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Christina T Blanchard; Britt K Erickson; Jeff Szychowski; Charles A Leath; Joseph R Biggio; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for a benign pathological condition.

Authors:  Gery Lamblin; Capucine Meysonnier; Stéphanie Moret; Béatrice Nadaud; Georges Mellier; Gautier Chene
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Risk reduction surgery (RRS) for tubo-ovarian cancer in an Irish gynaecological practice: an analysis of indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Claire Thompson; Ciara McCormick; Waseem Kamran; Ciaran O'Riain; Lucy Norris; David Gallagher; Noreen Gleeson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Does Saving Uterus Save Ovaries?

Authors:  Suvarna Khadilkar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-03-18

5.  IS "OVARIAN" CANCER A MISNOMER? EXPLORING OVARIAN CANCER ORIGINS IN THE MOUSE.

Authors:  Kathleen R Cho
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2018

6.  Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.

Authors:  Laura A M van Lieshout; Miranda P Steenbeek; Joanne A De Hullu; M Caroline Vos; Saskia Houterman; Jack Wilkinson; Jurgen Mj Piek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-28

7.  Prophylactic salpingectomy and ovarian cancer: An evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Tricia Dewi Anggraeni; Adly Nanda Al Fattah; Raymond Surya
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Recommendations and Choices for BRCA Mutation Carriers at Risk for Ovarian Cancer: A Complicated Decision.

Authors:  Kelsey E Lewis; Karen H Lu; Amber M Klimczak; Samuel C Mok
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Factors influencing decision-making around opportunistic salpingectomy: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Miranda P Steenbeek; Laura A M van Lieshout; Johanna W M Aarts; Jurgen M J Piek; Sjors F P J Coppus; Leon F A G Massuger; Rosella P M G Hermens; Joanne A de Hullu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Benign Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Assessment of Possible Complications and Histopathological p53-Signatures.

Authors:  Gautier Chene; Sarah Urvoas; Stéphanie Moret; Béatrice Nadaud; Annie Buenerd; Philippe Chabert; Georges Mellier; Gery Lamblin
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.