Theodora Tzanavari1, Aimilia Varela2, Stamatis Theocharis3, Elpinickie Ninou4, Alkistis Kapelouzou2, Dennis V Cokkinos5, Maria I Kontaridis6, Katia P Karalis7. 1. Center for Clinical, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece. Electronic address: ttzanavari@bioacademy.gr. 2. Center for Clinical, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece. 3. First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 4. Centre for Basic Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece. 5. Center for Clinical, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece; First Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 7. Center for Clinical, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece; Endocrine Division, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: kkarali@bioacademy.gr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metformin administration is associated with myocardial protection during ischemia and/or reperfusion, possibly via inhibition of inflammatory responses in the heart. Exposure to pathogens, in addition to the activation of the immune system and the associated metabolic dysfunction, often results in compromised myocardial function. We examined whether metformin administration could maintain the normal myocardial function in experimental moderate Gram negative infection, induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: 129xC57BL/6 mice were divided into control groups that received either vehicle or a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of low dose LPS (5mg/kg body wt), and metformin treated groups that received either daily metformin (4mg/kg/animal) i.p. injections for five days prior to LPS administration [Experiment 1], or a single metformin injection following same dose of LPS [Experiment 2]. KEY RESULTS: LPS alone caused cardiac dysfunction, as confirmed by echocardiography, whereas metformin administration, either before or after LPS, rescued myocardial function. LPS caused marked reduction of the cardiac metabolism-related genes tested, including Prkaa2, Cpt1b, Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b; reduction of fatty acid oxidation, as reflected by the regulation of Ppara, Acaca and Acacb; increased glucose transport, as shown by Slc2a4 levels; reduction of ATP synthesis; significant increase of inflammatory markers, in particular IL6; and reduction of autophagy. Pretreatment with metformin normalized the levels of all these factors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We show for the first time that metformin protects the myocardium from LPS-associated myocardial dysfunction mainly by supporting its metabolic activity and allowing efficient energy utilization. Metformin can be a potential cardioprotective agent in individuals susceptible to exposure to pathogens.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Metformin administration is associated with myocardial protection during ischemia and/or reperfusion, possibly via inhibition of inflammatory responses in the heart. Exposure to pathogens, in addition to the activation of the immune system and the associated metabolic dysfunction, often results in compromised myocardial function. We examined whether metformin administration could maintain the normal myocardial function in experimental moderate Gram negative infection, induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: 129xC57BL/6 mice were divided into control groups that received either vehicle or a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of low dose LPS (5mg/kg body wt), and metformin treated groups that received either daily metformin (4mg/kg/animal) i.p. injections for five days prior to LPS administration [Experiment 1], or a single metformin injection following same dose of LPS [Experiment 2]. KEY RESULTS:LPS alone caused cardiac dysfunction, as confirmed by echocardiography, whereas metformin administration, either before or after LPS, rescued myocardial function. LPS caused marked reduction of the cardiac metabolism-related genes tested, including Prkaa2, Cpt1b, Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b; reduction of fatty acid oxidation, as reflected by the regulation of Ppara, Acaca and Acacb; increased glucose transport, as shown by Slc2a4 levels; reduction of ATP synthesis; significant increase of inflammatory markers, in particular IL6; and reduction of autophagy. Pretreatment with metformin normalized the levels of all these factors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We show for the first time that metformin protects the myocardium from LPS-associated myocardial dysfunction mainly by supporting its metabolic activity and allowing efficient energy utilization. Metformin can be a potential cardioprotective agent in individuals susceptible to exposure to pathogens.
Authors: Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Finlay A McAlister; Ross T Tsuyuki; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Joel Schilling; Ling Lai; Nandakumar Sambandam; Courtney E Dey; Teresa C Leone; Daniel P Kelly Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Hwi Jin Ko; Zhiyou Zhang; Dae Young Jung; John Y Jun; Zhexi Ma; Kelly E Jones; Sook Y Chan; Jason K Kim Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Alexander Jenke; Mariam Yazdanyar; Shunsuke Miyahara; Agunda Chekhoeva; Moritz Benjamin Immohr; Julia Kistner; Udo Boeken; Artur Lichtenberg; Payam Akhyari Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Margaret A McBride; Allison M Owen; Cody L Stothers; Antonio Hernandez; Liming Luan; Katherine R Burelbach; Tazeen K Patil; Julia K Bohannon; Edward R Sherwood; Naeem K Patil Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Julia C Wilmanns; Raghav Pandey; Olivia Hon; Anjana Chandran; Jan M Schilling; Elvira Forte; Qizhu Wu; Gael Cagnone; Preeti Bais; Vivek Philip; David Coleman; Heidi Kocalis; Stuart K Archer; James T Pearson; Mirana Ramialison; Joerg Heineke; Hemal H Patel; Nadia A Rosenthal; Milena B Furtado; Mauro W Costa Journal: Mol Metab Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 7.422