Yutaka Midorikawa1, Tadatoshi Takayama2, Tokio Higaki1, Hisashi Nakayama1, Masakazu Yamamoto3, Shunichi Ariizumi3, Kazuaki Shimada4, Norihiro Kokudo5, Shingo Tsuji6, Kaoru Tsuchiya7, Masayuki Kurosaki7, Namiki Izumi7. 1. Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo. 2. Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo takayama.tadatoshi@nihon-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo. 4. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo. 5. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo , Tokyo. 6. Genome Science Division, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technologies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo. 7. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer may contribute substantially to complete cure, but it remains unknown whether treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma can actually result in cure. This study was performed to clarify the cancer risk of the background liver after treating early hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Early hepatocellular carcinoma is defined as very well-differentiated cancer containing Glisson's triad. The cumulative incidence of classical hepatocellular carcinoma, hypervascular liver cancer detected on imaging studies, after resection of early hepatocellular carcinoma positive for anti-hepatitis C antibody (early hepatocellular carcinoma group, n = 105) was compared with that in patients with chronic liver disease positive for anti-hepatitis C antibody (control group, n = 751) and propensity score-matched patients after resection of classical hepatocellular carcinoma (classical hepatocellular carcinoma group, n = 105). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 0.3-15.0), the cumulative incidence of classical hepatocellular carcinoma at 5 years was 56.9% (95% confidence interval, 44.2-67.7%) in the early hepatocellular carcinoma group and 70.6% (52.5-81.8%) in the classical hepatocellular carcinoma group as compared with 4.6% (2.8-6.4%) in the control group. The risk of the development of classical hepatocellular carcinoma in the early hepatocellular carcinoma group was significantly higher than that in the control group (hazard ratio, 17.5; 95% confidence interval, 12.1-25.3; P < 0.001) and significantly lower than that in the classical hepatocellular carcinoma group (hazard ratio, 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P = 0.010). However, the cumulative incidence of second primary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with one early hepatocellular carcinoma did not differ significantly from that in patients with two or more early hepatocellular carcinoma lesions (hazard ratio, 1.50; 0.85-2.65; P = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma cannot provide complete cure due to the substantial risk of developing classical hepatocellular carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer may contribute substantially to complete cure, but it remains unknown whether treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma can actually result in cure. This study was performed to clarify the cancer risk of the background liver after treating early hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Early hepatocellular carcinoma is defined as very well-differentiated cancer containing Glisson's triad. The cumulative incidence of classical hepatocellular carcinoma, hypervascular liver cancer detected on imaging studies, after resection of early hepatocellular carcinoma positive for anti-hepatitis C antibody (early hepatocellular carcinoma group, n = 105) was compared with that in patients with chronic liver disease positive for anti-hepatitis C antibody (control group, n = 751) and propensity score-matched patients after resection of classical hepatocellular carcinoma (classical hepatocellular carcinoma group, n = 105). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 0.3-15.0), the cumulative incidence of classical hepatocellular carcinoma at 5 years was 56.9% (95% confidence interval, 44.2-67.7%) in the early hepatocellular carcinoma group and 70.6% (52.5-81.8%) in the classical hepatocellular carcinoma group as compared with 4.6% (2.8-6.4%) in the control group. The risk of the development of classical hepatocellular carcinoma in the early hepatocellular carcinoma group was significantly higher than that in the control group (hazard ratio, 17.5; 95% confidence interval, 12.1-25.3; P < 0.001) and significantly lower than that in the classical hepatocellular carcinoma group (hazard ratio, 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P = 0.010). However, the cumulative incidence of second primary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with one early hepatocellular carcinoma did not differ significantly from that in patients with two or more early hepatocellular carcinoma lesions (hazard ratio, 1.50; 0.85-2.65; P = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma cannot provide complete cure due to the substantial risk of developing classical hepatocellular carcinoma.