K J Williams1, R Ravikumar1, A S Gaweesh2, H M Moore3, A D Lifsitz4, T R A Lane1, J Shalhoub1, A Babber1, A H Davies1. 1. Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. 3. Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. hayley.moore03@imperial.ac.uk. 4. Servicio de Cirugía General, Sector Flebolinfología, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The prevention and management of venous disease is a therapeutic challenge. Movement of blood through the venous system is augmented by the action of muscles on the deep veins, and can be achieved through the application of electrical current. The efficacy of currently available clinical devices for this purpose is unknown, and is investigated here. METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and Medline databases was performed, and studies were included if they were full text articles, written in english, pertaining to venous disease and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). RESULTS: NMES devices increase venous haemodynamic parameters such as peak velocity and volume flow. Studies report them to be non-inferior to intermittent pneumatic compression. They are effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolism, though inferior to low molecular weight heparin. NMES can reduce symptoms of chronic venous disease. DISCUSSION: NMES is an important tool in the prevention and management of venous disease, and avoids the significant risks associated with heparin administration. Data explored here is heterogenous in device, protocol, and reported end-points, therefore should be interpreted with care. Long term effects of treatment with NMES have not been explored.
INTRODUCTION: The prevention and management of venous disease is a therapeutic challenge. Movement of blood through the venous system is augmented by the action of muscles on the deep veins, and can be achieved through the application of electrical current. The efficacy of currently available clinical devices for this purpose is unknown, and is investigated here. METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and Medline databases was performed, and studies were included if they were full text articles, written in english, pertaining to venous disease and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). RESULTS: NMES devices increase venous haemodynamic parameters such as peak velocity and volume flow. Studies report them to be non-inferior to intermittent pneumatic compression. They are effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolism, though inferior to low molecular weight heparin. NMES can reduce symptoms of chronic venous disease. DISCUSSION: NMES is an important tool in the prevention and management of venous disease, and avoids the significant risks associated with heparin administration. Data explored here is heterogenous in device, protocol, and reported end-points, therefore should be interpreted with care. Long term effects of treatment with NMES have not been explored.
Authors: Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Alicia González-Represas; Ezequiel Rey; Alicia Martínez-Rodríguez; Anton Kalén; Olga Marques; Luís Rama Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.390