| Literature DB >> 27620301 |
Ward A Heggermont1, Marc Goethals2, Riet Dierckx2, Sofie Verstreken2, Jozef Bartunek2, Marc Vanderheyden2.
Abstract
The brand new 2016 ESC guidelines for the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure continue to give a prominent place to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In the prevention of HF hospitalization and death, a class I, level of recommendation A, is given to MRAs for patients with HFrEF, who remain symptomatic despite treatment with an ACE-inhibitor and a beta-blocker and have an LVEF below 35 %. This recommendation is primarily based on two landmark trials, the RALES trial (for spironolactone) and the EMPHASIS-HF trial (for eplerenone). A crucial question is, however, why MRAs are advised only in "third place," i.e., after optimal up-titration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers. We wonder whether MRAs could not or should not be given earlier in the treatment of HFrEF, namely before or together with the up-titration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers. Several arguments to support this plea are described in this short paper.Entities:
Keywords: Eplerenone; Heart failure guidelines; Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; Spironolactone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27620301 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-016-9583-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Fail Rev ISSN: 1382-4147 Impact factor: 4.214