Ayman F El-Kattan1, Manthena V Varma2, Stefan J Steyn3, Dennis O Scott3, Tristan S Maurer3, Arthur Bergman4. 1. Pharmacokinetcis, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Ayman.El-Kattan@pfizer.com. 2. Pharmacokinetcis, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA. 3. Pharmacokinetcis, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the utility of Extended Clearance Classification System (ECCS) in understanding absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) attributes and enabling victim drug-drug interaction (DDI) predictions. METHODS: A database of 368 drugs with relevant ADME parameters, main metabolizing enzymes, uptake transporters, efflux transporters, and highest change in exposure (%AUC) in presence of inhibitors was developed using published literature. Drugs were characterized according to ECCS using ionization, molecular weight and estimated permeability. RESULTS: Analyses suggested that ECCS class 1A drugs are well absorbed and systemic clearance is determined by metabolism mediated by CYP2C, esterases, and UGTs. For class 1B drugs, oral absorption is high and the predominant clearance mechanism is hepatic uptake mediated by OATP transporters. High permeability neutral/basic drugs (class 2) showed high oral absorption, with metabolism mediated generally by CYP3A, CYP2D6 and UGTs as the predominant clearance mechanism. Class 3A/4 drugs showed moderate absorption with dominant renal clearance involving OAT/OCT2 transporters. Class 3B drugs showed low to moderate absorption with hepatic uptake (OATPs) and/or renal clearance as primary clearance mechanisms. The highest DDI risk is typically seen with class 2/1B/3B compounds manifested by inhibition of either CYP metabolism or active hepatic uptake. Class 2 showed a wider range in AUC change likely due to a variety of enzymes involved. DDI risk for class 3A/4 is small and associated with inhibition of renal transporters. CONCLUSIONS: ECCS provides a framework to project ADME profiles and further enables prediction of victim DDI liabilities in drug discovery and development.
PURPOSE: To assess the utility of Extended Clearance Classification System (ECCS) in understanding absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) attributes and enabling victim drug-drug interaction (DDI) predictions. METHODS: A database of 368 drugs with relevant ADME parameters, main metabolizing enzymes, uptake transporters, efflux transporters, and highest change in exposure (%AUC) in presence of inhibitors was developed using published literature. Drugs were characterized according to ECCS using ionization, molecular weight and estimated permeability. RESULTS: Analyses suggested that ECCS class 1A drugs are well absorbed and systemic clearance is determined by metabolism mediated by CYP2C, esterases, and UGTs. For class 1B drugs, oral absorption is high and the predominant clearance mechanism is hepatic uptake mediated by OATP transporters. High permeability neutral/basic drugs (class 2) showed high oral absorption, with metabolism mediated generally by CYP3A, CYP2D6 and UGTs as the predominant clearance mechanism. Class 3A/4 drugs showed moderate absorption with dominant renal clearance involving OAT/OCT2 transporters. Class 3B drugs showed low to moderate absorption with hepatic uptake (OATPs) and/or renal clearance as primary clearance mechanisms. The highest DDI risk is typically seen with class 2/1B/3B compounds manifested by inhibition of either CYP metabolism or active hepatic uptake. Class 2 showed a wider range in AUC change likely due to a variety of enzymes involved. DDI risk for class 3A/4 is small and associated with inhibition of renal transporters. CONCLUSIONS: ECCS provides a framework to project ADME profiles and further enables prediction of victim DDI liabilities in drug discovery and development.
Entities:
Keywords:
DDI; active hepatic uptake; clearance mechanism; metabolism; renal elimination
Authors: Paul Morgan; Piet H Van Der Graaf; John Arrowsmith; Doug E Feltner; Kira S Drummond; Craig D Wegner; Steve D A Street Journal: Drug Discov Today Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 7.851
Authors: K Maeda; Y Ikeda; T Fujita; K Yoshida; Y Azuma; Y Haruyama; N Yamane; Y Kumagai; Y Sugiyama Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Manthena V Varma; Catherine M Ambler; Mohammad Ullah; Charles J Rotter; Hao Sun; John Litchfield; Katherine S Fenner; Ayman F El-Kattan Journal: Curr Drug Metab Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Bo Feng; Susan Hurst; Yasong Lu; Manthena V Varma; Charles J Rotter; Ayman El-Kattan; Peter Lockwood; Brian Corrigan Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Kathleen M Giacomini; Shiew-Mei Huang; Donald J Tweedie; Leslie Z Benet; Kim L R Brouwer; Xiaoyan Chu; Amber Dahlin; Raymond Evers; Volker Fischer; Kathleen M Hillgren; Keith A Hoffmaster; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Dietrich Keppler; Richard B Kim; Caroline A Lee; Mikko Niemi; Joseph W Polli; Yuichi Sugiyama; Peter W Swaan; Joseph A Ware; Stephen H Wright; Sook Wah Yee; Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski; Lei Zhang Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Svitlana Igel; Siegfried Drescher; Thomas Mürdter; Ute Hofmann; Georg Heinkele; Heike Tegude; Hartmut Glaeser; Stefanie S Brenner; Andrew A Somogyi; Taher Omari; Christian Schäfer; Michel Eichelbaum; Martin F Fromm Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2007 Impact factor: 6.447