Srikrishna Varun Malayala1, Ambreen Raza2. 1. Department of Hospital Medicine, Jeanes Hospital, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Cooper University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2009, United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommends aspirin (ASA) for men aged 45-79 years when the benefit of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk reduction outweighs the harm of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Our objective is to evaluate compliance with this USPSTF recommendation. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study and 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset was used for this study. Out of the available sample, 1155 (11.8%) had the inclusion criteria (men aged 45-79 years, no prior history of CAD). The participants' 10-year Framingham risk score for developing CAD was calculated to identify the people who meet criteria to take aspirin. The population characteristics that influence the physicians' decision to prescribe aspirin and the characteristics those influence the participants' compliance with doctor's advice to take aspirin were identified. RESULTS: Almost 91.5% qualified for aspirin intake. About 65% (595/916) of them were not advised by their providers to take aspirin. Among the 321 who were prescribed aspirin, 30% (96/321) were non-compliant and 1.2% (4/321) discontinued aspirin because of side effects. In the group that did not qualify for aspirin, 37.6% (32/85) were inappropriately prescribed aspirin out of which 78.1% (25/32) were actually taking it. Younger age and lesser comorbidities were significantly associated with under prescription by physicians (P < .001) and lower compliance by participants (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In April 2016, USPSTF updated the recommendations regarding benefits of aspirin. Our study evaluates the factors that influenced the compliance with the 2009 recommendations. This study highlights the challenges that the 2016 guidelines might have to face.
OBJECTIVE: In 2009, United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommends aspirin (ASA) for men aged 45-79 years when the benefit of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk reduction outweighs the harm of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Our objective is to evaluate compliance with this USPSTF recommendation. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study and 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset was used for this study. Out of the available sample, 1155 (11.8%) had the inclusion criteria (men aged 45-79 years, no prior history of CAD). The participants' 10-year Framingham risk score for developing CAD was calculated to identify the people who meet criteria to take aspirin. The population characteristics that influence the physicians' decision to prescribe aspirin and the characteristics those influence the participants' compliance with doctor's advice to take aspirin were identified. RESULTS: Almost 91.5% qualified for aspirin intake. About 65% (595/916) of them were not advised by their providers to take aspirin. Among the 321 who were prescribed aspirin, 30% (96/321) were non-compliant and 1.2% (4/321) discontinued aspirin because of side effects. In the group that did not qualify for aspirin, 37.6% (32/85) were inappropriately prescribed aspirin out of which 78.1% (25/32) were actually taking it. Younger age and lesser comorbidities were significantly associated with under prescription by physicians (P < .001) and lower compliance by participants (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In April 2016, USPSTF updated the recommendations regarding benefits of aspirin. Our study evaluates the factors that influenced the compliance with the 2009 recommendations. This study highlights the challenges that the 2016 guidelines might have to face.
Authors: Hans Krueger; Sylvia Robinson; Trevor Hancock; Richard Birtwhistle; Jane A Buxton; Bonnie Henry; Jennifer Scarr; John J Spinelli Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: John J McNeil; Rory Wolfe; Robyn L Woods; Andrew M Tonkin; Geoffrey A Donnan; Mark R Nelson; Christopher M Reid; Jessica E Lockery; Brenda Kirpach; Elsdon Storey; Raj C Shah; Jeff D Williamson; Karen L Margolis; Michael E Ernst; Walter P Abhayaratna; Nigel Stocks; Sharyn M Fitzgerald; Suzanne G Orchard; Ruth E Trevaks; Lawrence J Beilin; Colin I Johnston; Joanne Ryan; Barbara Radziszewska; Michael Jelinek; Mobin Malik; Charles B Eaton; Donna Brauer; Geoff Cloud; Erica M Wood; Suzanne E Mahady; Suzanne Satterfield; Richard Grimm; Anne M Murray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-09-16 Impact factor: 91.245