OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative validity of the latest version of the Scottish Collaborative Group (SCG) FFQ (version 6.6) in adults living in Scotland. DESIGN: A cross-sectional validation study. Participants completed the self-administered, 169-item SCG FFQ followed by a 7 d, non-weighed food diary. Energy and energy-adjusted macronutrients and micronutrients were examined for relative validity through Spearman's correlation, the percentage of classification into thirds of intake, Cohen's weighted kappa (κ w) and Bland-Altman analysis. SETTING: General population living in Scotland. SUBJECTS: Ninety-six adults aged 18-65 years. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0·21 (retinol) to 0·71 (Mg). A median of 52 % of adults were correctly classified into thirds of intake (range: 42 % (PUFA, MUFA and Fe) to 64 % (percentage energy from carbohydrates)) and 8 % were grossly misclassified into opposite thirds of intake (range: 3 % (carbohydrates, percentage energy from carbohydrates) to 19 % (thiamin)). Values of κ w ranged between 0·20 (PUFA, β-carotene) to 0·55 (percentage energy from carbohydrates). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the smallest limits of agreement, when expressed as a percentage of the mean intake from the FFQ and food diary, were seen for the main macronutrients carbohydrates, fat and protein. CONCLUSIONS: As in the previous validation study more than 10 years ago, the FFQ gave higher estimates of energy and most nutrients than the food diary, but after adjustment for energy intake the FFQ could be used in place of non-weighed food diaries for most macronutrients and many micronutrients in large-scale epidemiological studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative validity of the latest version of the Scottish Collaborative Group (SCG) FFQ (version 6.6) in adults living in Scotland. DESIGN: A cross-sectional validation study. Participants completed the self-administered, 169-item SCG FFQ followed by a 7 d, non-weighed food diary. Energy and energy-adjusted macronutrients and micronutrients were examined for relative validity through Spearman's correlation, the percentage of classification into thirds of intake, Cohen's weighted kappa (κ w) and Bland-Altman analysis. SETTING: General population living in Scotland. SUBJECTS: Ninety-six adults aged 18-65 years. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0·21 (retinol) to 0·71 (Mg). A median of 52 % of adults were correctly classified into thirds of intake (range: 42 % (PUFA, MUFA and Fe) to 64 % (percentage energy from carbohydrates)) and 8 % were grossly misclassified into opposite thirds of intake (range: 3 % (carbohydrates, percentage energy from carbohydrates) to 19 % (thiamin)). Values of κ w ranged between 0·20 (PUFA, β-carotene) to 0·55 (percentage energy from carbohydrates). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the smallest limits of agreement, when expressed as a percentage of the mean intake from the FFQ and food diary, were seen for the main macronutrients carbohydrates, fat and protein. CONCLUSIONS: As in the previous validation study more than 10 years ago, the FFQ gave higher estimates of energy and most nutrients than the food diary, but after adjustment for energy intake the FFQ could be used in place of non-weighed food diaries for most macronutrients and many micronutrients in large-scale epidemiological studies.
Authors: Emma Flanagan; Donnie Cameron; Rashed Sobhan; Chloe Wong; Matthew G Pontifex; Nicole Tosi; Pedro Mena; Daniele Del Rio; Saber Sami; Arjan Narbad; Michael Müller; Michael Hornberger; David Vauzour Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-05-19
Authors: Maisie K Rowland; Ashley J Adamson; Ivan Poliakov; Jennifer Bradley; Emma Simpson; Patrick Olivier; Emma Foster Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Jozef Hooson Jzh; Jayne Hutchinson Jyh; Marisol Warthon-Medina; Neil Hancock; Katharine Greathead; Bethany Knowles; Elisa Vargas-Garcia; Lauren E Gibson; Linda A Bush; Barrie Margetts; Sian Robinson; Andy Ness; Nisreen A Alwan; Petra A Wark; Mark Roe; Paul Finglas; Toni Steer; Polly Page; Laura Johnson; Katharine Roberts; Birdem Amoutzopoulos; Victoria J Burley; Darren C Greenwood; Janet E Cade Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Stephen D J Makin; Ghaida F Mubki; Fergus N Doubal; Kirsten Shuler; Julie Staals; Martin S Dennis; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Sonja H Brunvoll; Inger Thune; Hanne Frydenberg; Vidar G Flote; Gro F Bertheussen; Ellen Schlichting; Kristian S Bjerve; Anette Hjartåker Journal: Nutr J Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 3.271