Sirinya Phulkerd1, Stefanie Vandevijvere2, Mark Lawrence3, Viroj Tangcharoensathien4, Gary Sacks5. 1. 1School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Deakin University,221 Burwood Highway,Burwood,VIC 3125,Australia. 2. 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences,University of Auckland,Auckland,New Zealand. 3. 4Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition,Deakin University,Burwood,Victoria,Australia. 4. 2International Health Policy Program,Ministry of Public Health,Nonthaburi,Thailand. 5. 5WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention,Deakin University,Burwood,Victoria,Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the level of implementation of policies for healthy food environments in Thailand with reference to international best practice by state and non-state actors. DESIGN: Data on the current level of implementation of food environment policies were assessed independently using the adapted Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) by two groups of actors. Concrete actions were proposed for Thai Government. A joint meeting between both groups was subsequently held to reach consensus on priority actions. SETTING: Thailand. SUBJECTS: Thirty state actors and twenty-seven non-state actors. RESULTS: Level of policy implementation varied across different domains and actor groups. State actors rated implementation levels higher than non-state actors. Both state and non-state actors rated level of implementation of monitoring of BMI highest. Level of implementation of policies promoting in-store availability of healthy foods and policies increasing tax on unhealthy foods were rated lowest by state and non-state actors, respectively. Both groups reached consensus on eleven priority actions for implementation, focusing on food provision in public-sector settings, food composition, food promotion, leadership, monitoring and intelligence, and food trade. CONCLUSIONS: Although the implementation gaps identified and priority actions proposed varied between state and non-state actors, both groups achieved consensus on a comprehensive food policy package to be implemented by the Thai Government to improve the healthiness of food environments. This consensus is a platform for continued policy dialogue towards cross-sectoral policy coherence and effective actions to address the growing burden of non-communicable diseases and obesity in Thailand.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the level of implementation of policies for healthy food environments in Thailand with reference to international best practice by state and non-state actors. DESIGN: Data on the current level of implementation of food environment policies were assessed independently using the adapted Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) by two groups of actors. Concrete actions were proposed for Thai Government. A joint meeting between both groups was subsequently held to reach consensus on priority actions. SETTING: Thailand. SUBJECTS: Thirty state actors and twenty-seven non-state actors. RESULTS: Level of policy implementation varied across different domains and actor groups. State actors rated implementation levels higher than non-state actors. Both state and non-state actors rated level of implementation of monitoring of BMI highest. Level of implementation of policies promoting in-store availability of healthy foods and policies increasing tax on unhealthy foods were rated lowest by state and non-state actors, respectively. Both groups reached consensus on eleven priority actions for implementation, focusing on food provision in public-sector settings, food composition, food promotion, leadership, monitoring and intelligence, and food trade. CONCLUSIONS: Although the implementation gaps identified and priority actions proposed varied between state and non-state actors, both groups achieved consensus on a comprehensive food policy package to be implemented by the Thai Government to improve the healthiness of food environments. This consensus is a platform for continued policy dialogue towards cross-sectoral policy coherence and effective actions to address the growing burden of non-communicable diseases and obesity in Thailand.
Entities:
Keywords:
Healthy food environments; Non-communicable diseases; Obesity; Policy implementation; State and non-state actors
Authors: Adrian J Cameron; Erica Reeve; Josephine Marshall; Tailane Scapin; Oliver Huse; Devorah Riesenberg; Dheepa Jeyapalan; Sandro Demaio; Fiona Watson; Roland Kupka; Karla P Correa; Miranda Blake; Kathryn Backholer; Anna Peeters; Gary Sacks Journal: Curr Nutr Rep Date: 2021-12-11
Authors: Daniel Penn-Newman; Sarah Shaw; Donna Congalton; Sofia Strommer; Taylor Morris; Wendy Lawrence; Debbie Chase; Cyrus Cooper; Mary Barker; Janis Baird; Hazel Inskip; Christina Vogel Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Lana Vanderlee; Sahar Goorang; Kimiya Karbasy; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Mary R L'Abbé Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rachel Jl Prowse; Sarah A Richmond; Sarah Carsley; Heather Manson; Brent Moloughney Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Sanne K Djojosoeparto; Carlijn B M Kamphuis; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Maartje P Poelman Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.380