Literature DB >> 27618842

The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection.

Neetha Das1, Wouter Biesmans, Alexander Bertrand, Tom Francart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We consider the problem of Auditory Attention Detection (AAD), where the goal is to detect which speaker a person is attending to, in a multi-speaker environment, based on neural activity. This work aims to analyze the influence of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding on the performance of an AAD algorithm. APPROACH: We recorded high-density EEG of 16 normal-hearing subjects as they listened to two speech streams while tasked to attend to the speaker in either their left or right ear. The attended ear was switched between trials. The speech stimuli were administered either dichotically, or after filtering using Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTFs). A spatio-temporal decoder was trained and used to reconstruct the attended stimulus envelope, and the correlations between the reconstructed and the original stimulus envelopes were used to perform AAD, and arrive at a percentage correct score over all trials. MAIN
RESULTS: We found that the HRTF condition resulted in significantly higher AAD performance than the dichotic condition. However, speech intelligibility, measured under the same set of conditions, was lower for the HRTF filtered stimuli. We also found that decoders trained and tested for a specific attended ear performed better, compared to decoders trained and tested for both left and right attended ear simultaneously. In the context of the decoders supporting hearing prostheses, the former approach is less realistic, and studies in which each subject always had to attend to the same ear may find over-optimistic results. SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows the importance of using realistic binaural listening conditions and training on a balanced set of experimental conditions to obtain results that are more representative for the true AAD performance in practical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27618842     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/056014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  9 in total

1.  Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Zhuo Chen; Jose Herrero; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  How to discern external acoustic waves in a piezoelectric neuron under noise?

Authors:  Ying Xie; Jun Ma
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 1.560

4.  Neural Markers of Speech Comprehension: Measuring EEG Tracking of Linguistic Speech Representations, Controlling the Speech Acoustics.

Authors:  Marlies Gillis; Jonas Vanthornhout; Jonathan Z Simon; Tom Francart; Christian Brodbeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Decoding the Attended Speaker From EEG Using Adaptive Evaluation Intervals Captures Fluctuations in Attentional Listening.

Authors:  Manuela Jaeger; Bojana Mirkovic; Martin G Bleichner; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Effect of Task and Attention on Neural Tracking of Speech.

Authors:  Jonas Vanthornhout; Lien Decruy; Tom Francart
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Implementation of an Online Auditory Attention Detection Model with Electroencephalography in a Dichotomous Listening Experiment.

Authors:  Seung-Cheol Baek; Jae Ho Chung; Yoonseob Lim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Cortical encoding of melodic expectations in human temporal cortex.

Authors:  Claire Pelofi; Roberta Bianco; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Prachi Patel; Ashesh D Mehta; Jose L Herrero; Alain de Cheveigné; Shihab Shamma; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.