Literature DB >> 27618562

Major and minor crRNA annealing sites facilitate low stringency DNA protospacer binding prior to Type I-A CRISPR-Cas interference in Sulfolobus.

Marzieh Mousaei1, Ling Deng1, Qunxin She1, Roger A Garrett1.   

Abstract

The stringency of crRNA-protospacer DNA base pair matching required for effective CRISPR-Cas interference is relatively low in crenarchaeal Sulfolobus species in contrast to that required in some bacteria. To understand its biological significance we studied crRNA-protospacer interactions in Sulfolobus islandicus REY15A which carries multiple, and functionally diverse, interference complexes. A range of mismatches were introduced into a vector-borne protospacer that was identical to spacer 1 of CRISPR locus 2, with a cognate CCN PAM sequence. Two important crRNA annealing regions were identified on the 39 bp protospacer, a strong primary site centered on nucleotides 3 - 7 and a weaker secondary site at nucleotides 21 - 25. Multiple mismatches introduced into remaining protospacer regions did not seriously impair interference. Extending the study to different protospacers demonstrated that the efficacy of the secondary site was greatest for protospacers with higher G+C contents. In addition, the interference effects were assigned specifically to the type I-A dsDNA-targeting module by repeating the experiments with mutated protospacer constructs that were transformed into an S. islandicus mutant lacking type III-Bα and III-Bβ interference gene cassettes, which showed similar interference levels to those of the wild-type strain. Parallels are drawn to the involvement of 2 annealing sites for microRNAs on some eukaryal mRNAs which provide enhanced binding capacity and specificity. A biological rationale for the relatively low crRNA-protospacer base pairing stringency among the Sulfolobales is considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Cas; Sulfolobus; Type I-A; cRNA; protospacer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27618562      PMCID: PMC5100340          DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1229735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA Biol        ISSN: 1547-6286            Impact factor:   4.652


  47 in total

1.  Persistence of seed-based activity following segmentation of a microRNA guide strand.

Authors:  Guillaume Chorn; Lihong Zhao; Alan B Sachs; W Michael Flanagan; Lee P Lim
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 2.  Planting the seed: target recognition of short guide RNAs.

Authors:  Tim Künne; Daan C Swarts; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Homologous recombination in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius: genetic assays and functional properties.

Authors:  Dennis W Grogan
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus.

Authors:  Hélène Deveau; Rodolphe Barrangou; Josiane E Garneau; Jessica Labonté; Christophe Fremaux; Patrick Boyaval; Dennis A Romero; Philippe Horvath; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Omer S Alkhnbashi; Fabrizio Costa; Shiraz A Shah; Sita J Saunders; Rodolphe Barrangou; Stan J J Brouns; Emmanuelle Charpentier; Daniel H Haft; Philippe Horvath; Sylvain Moineau; Francisco J M Mojica; Rebecca M Terns; Michael P Terns; Malcolm F White; Alexander F Yakunin; Roger A Garrett; John van der Oost; Rolf Backofen; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Sequence- and structure-specific RNA processing by a CRISPR endonuclease.

Authors:  Rachel E Haurwitz; Martin Jinek; Blake Wiedenheft; Kaihong Zhou; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Two distinct DNA binding modes guide dual roles of a CRISPR-Cas protein complex.

Authors:  Timothy R Blosser; Luuk Loeff; Edze R Westra; Marnix Vlot; Tim Künne; Małgorzata Sobota; Cees Dekker; Stan J J Brouns; Chirlmin Joo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  An archaeal CRISPR type III-B system exhibiting distinctive RNA targeting features and mediating dual RNA and DNA interference.

Authors:  Wenfang Peng; Mingxia Feng; Xu Feng; Yun Xiang Liang; Qunxin She
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Protospacer recognition motifs: mixed identities and functional diversity.

Authors:  Shiraz A Shah; Susanne Erdmann; Francisco J M Mojica; Roger A Garrett
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  CRISPR adaptive immune systems of Archaea.

Authors:  Gisle Vestergaard; Roger A Garrett; Shiraz A Shah
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.652

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The enigmatic archaeal virosphere.

Authors:  David Prangishvili; Dennis H Bamford; Patrick Forterre; Jaime Iranzo; Eugene V Koonin; Mart Krupovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems in Sulfolobales: genetic studies and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhenxiao Yu; Suping Jiang; Yuan Wang; Xuhui Tian; Pengpeng Zhao; Jianan Xu; Mingxia Feng; Qunxin She
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.038

3.  CRISPR-Cas type I-A Cascade complex couples viral infection surveillance to host transcriptional regulation in the dependence of Csa3b.

Authors:  Fei He; Gisle Vestergaard; Wenfang Peng; Qunxin She; Xu Peng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Diversified local CRISPR-Cas immunity to viruses of Sulfolobus islandicus.

Authors:  Matthew D Pauly; Maria A Bautista; Jesse A Black; Rachel J Whitaker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Heavily Armed Ancestors: CRISPR Immunity and Applications in Archaea with a Comparative Analysis of CRISPR Types in Sulfolobales.

Authors:  Isabelle Anna Zink; Erika Wimmer; Christa Schleper
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.