Literature DB >> 27618449

Unsupervised detection of cancer driver mutations with parsimony-guided learning.

Runjun D Kumar1,2,3, S Joshua Swamidass2,4, Ron Bose1.   

Abstract

Methods are needed to reliably prioritize biologically active driver mutations over inactive passengers in high-throughput sequencing cancer data sets. We present ParsSNP, an unsupervised functional impact predictor that is guided by parsimony. ParsSNP uses an expectation-maximization framework to find mutations that explain tumor incidence broadly, without using predefined training labels that can introduce biases. We compare ParsSNP to five existing tools (CanDrA, CHASM, FATHMM Cancer, TransFIC, and Condel) across five distinct benchmarks. ParsSNP outperformed the existing tools in 24 of 25 comparisons. To investigate the real-world benefit of these improvements, we applied ParsSNP to an independent data set of 30 patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer. ParsSNP identified many known and likely driver mutations that other methods did not detect, including truncation mutations in known tumor suppressors and the recurrent driver substitution RHOA p.Tyr42Cys. In conclusion, ParsSNP uses an innovative, parsimony-based approach to prioritize cancer driver mutations and provides dramatic improvements over existing methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27618449      PMCID: PMC5328615          DOI: 10.1038/ng.3658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  40 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application.

Authors:  I A Basheer; M Hajmeer
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Only three driver gene mutations are required for the development of lung and colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Cristian Tomasetti; Luigi Marchionni; Martin A Nowak; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Improving the prediction of the functional impact of cancer mutations by baseline tolerance transformation.

Authors:  Abel Gonzalez-Perez; Jordi Deu-Pons; Nuria Lopez-Bigas
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Predicting the functional consequences of cancer-associated amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  Hashem A Shihab; Julian Gough; David N Cooper; Ian N M Day; Tom R Gaunt
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Identifying cancer driver genes in tumor genome sequencing studies.

Authors:  Ahrim Youn; Richard Simon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011.

Authors:  Pauline A Fujita; Brooke Rhead; Ann S Zweig; Angie S Hinrichs; Donna Karolchik; Melissa S Cline; Mary Goldman; Galt P Barber; Hiram Clawson; Antonio Coelho; Mark Diekhans; Timothy R Dreszer; Belinda M Giardine; Rachel A Harte; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Fan Hsu; Vanessa Kirkup; Robert M Kuhn; Katrina Learned; Chin H Li; Laurence R Meyer; Andy Pohl; Brian J Raney; Kate R Rosenbloom; Kayla E Smith; David Haussler; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Kin-Driver: a database of driver mutations in protein kinases.

Authors:  Franco L Simonetti; Cristian Tornador; Nuria Nabau-Moretó; Miguel A Molina-Vila; Cristina Marino-Buslje
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool.

Authors:  Hannah Carter; Christopher Douville; Peter D Stenson; David N Cooper; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Functional impact bias reveals cancer drivers.

Authors:  Abel Gonzalez-Perez; Nuria Lopez-Bigas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  OncodriveROLE classifies cancer driver genes in loss of function and activating mode of action.

Authors:  Michael P Schroeder; Carlota Rubio-Perez; David Tamborero; Abel Gonzalez-Perez; Nuria Lopez-Bigas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  21 in total

1.  DriverML: a machine learning algorithm for identifying driver genes in cancer sequencing studies.

Authors:  Yi Han; Juze Yang; Xinyi Qian; Wei-Chung Cheng; Shu-Hsuan Liu; Xing Hua; Liyuan Zhou; Yaning Yang; Qingbiao Wu; Pengyuan Liu; Yan Lu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Comprehensive evaluation of computational methods for predicting cancer driver genes.

Authors:  Xiaohui Shi; Huajing Teng; Leisheng Shi; Wenjian Bi; Wenqing Wei; Fengbiao Mao; Zhongsheng Sun
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Orchid: a novel management, annotation and machine learning framework for analyzing cancer mutations.

Authors:  Clinton L Cario; John S Witte
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Site-Level Bioactivity of Small-Molecules from Deep-Learned Representations of Quantum Chemistry.

Authors:  Kathryn Sarullo; Matthew K Matlock; S Joshua Swamidass
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  CHASMplus Reveals the Scope of Somatic Missense Mutations Driving Human Cancers.

Authors:  Collin Tokheim; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 11.091

6.  Analysis of somatic mutations across the kinome reveals loss-of-function mutations in multiple cancer types.

Authors:  Runjun D Kumar; Ron Bose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Rho GTPases: Anti- or pro-neoplastic targets?

Authors:  I Zandvakili; Y Lin; J C Morris; Y Zheng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Driver pattern identification over the gene co-expression of drug response in ovarian cancer by integrating high throughput genomics data.

Authors:  Xinguo Lu; Jibo Lu; Bo Liao; Xing Li; Xin Qian; Keqin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluating machine learning methodologies for identification of cancer driver genes.

Authors:  Sharaf J Malebary; Yaser Daanial Khan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Computational Approaches to Prioritize Cancer Driver Missense Mutations.

Authors:  Feiyang Zhao; Lei Zheng; Alexander Goncearenco; Anna R Panchenko; Minghui Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.