Literature DB >> 27618408

The effects of predictor method factors on selection outcomes: A modular approach to personnel selection procedures.

Filip Lievens1, Paul R Sackett2.   

Abstract

Past reviews and meta-analyses typically conceptualized and examined selection procedures as holistic entities. We draw on the product design literature to propose a modular approach as a complementary perspective to conceptualizing selection procedures. A modular approach means that a product is broken down into its key underlying components. Therefore, we start by presenting a modular framework that identifies the important measurement components of selection procedures. Next, we adopt this modular lens for reviewing the available evidence regarding each of these components in terms of affecting validity, subgroup differences, and applicant perceptions, as well as for identifying new research directions. As a complement to the historical focus on holistic selection procedures, we posit that the theoretical contributions of a modular approach include improved insight into the isolated workings of the different components underlying selection procedures and greater theoretical connectivity among different selection procedures and their literatures. We also outline how organizations can put a modular approach into operation to increase the variety in selection procedures and to enhance the flexibility in designing them. Overall, we believe that a modular perspective on selection procedures will provide the impetus for programmatic and theory-driven research on the different measurement components of selection procedures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27618408     DOI: 10.1037/apl0000160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  3 in total

1.  Admission testing for higher education: A multi-cohort study on the validity of high-fidelity curriculum-sampling tests.

Authors:  A Susan M Niessen; Rob R Meijer; Jorge N Tendeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Who will go the extra mile? Selecting organizational citizens with a personality-based structured job interview.

Authors:  Anna Luca Heimann; Pia V Ingold; Maike E Debus; Martin Kleinmann
Journal:  J Bus Psychol       Date:  2020-10-07

3.  Are different station formats assessing different dimensions in multiple mini-interviews? Findings from the Canadian integrated French multiple mini-interviews.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Leduc; Sébastien Béland; Jean-Sébastien Renaud; Philippe Bégin; Robert Gagnon; Annie Ouellet; Christian Bourdy; Nathalie Loye
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.263

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.