Literature DB >> 27618329

Role of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Management of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis.

James X Chen1, Deepak Sudheendra1, S William Stavropoulos1, Gregory J Nadolski1.   

Abstract

The treatment for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is challenging, as the use of anticoagulation alone can be insufficient for restoring venous patency and thus lead to prolongation of acute symptoms and an increased risk of chronic complications, including venous insufficiency and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). In these cases, earlier and more complete thrombus removal can ameliorate acute symptoms and reduce long-term sequelae. Endovascular therapies involving the use of pharmacologic, mechanical, and combined pharmacomechanical modalities have been developed to achieve these goals. The most frequently used of these techniques, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), involves the infusion of a thrombolytic agent through a multiple-side-hole catheter placed within the thrombosed vein to achieve high local doses and thereby break down the clot while minimizing systemic thrombolytic agent exposure. Randomized controlled trial results have indicated decreased PTS rates and improved venous patency rates in patients treated with CDT compared with these rates in patients treated with anticoagulation. The use of newer pharmacomechanical techniques, as compared with conventional CDT, reduces procedural times and thrombolytic agent doses and is the subject of ongoing investigations. Endovascular thrombus removal techniques offer a means to improve venous valvular function and decrease the risk of debilitating long-term complications such as PTS and are a promising option for treating patients with iliofemoral DVT. (©)RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27618329     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  5 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular Therapy for Lower Extremity Chronic Deep Venous Occlusive Disease: State of Practice.

Authors:  Vibhor Wadhwa; Ravi N Srinivasa; Kyle J Cooper; Anthony N Hage; Jacob J Bundy; Brooke Spencer; Venu Vadlamudi; Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Pathogenesis of Thromboembolism and Endovascular Management.

Authors:  Sasan Behravesh; Peter Hoang; Alisha Nanda; Alex Wallace; Rahul A Sheth; Amy R Deipolyi; Adnan Memic; Sailendra Naidu; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2017-01-05

Review 3.  Outcome of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis Using Standard Treatment versus Thrombolytics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Abdella Birhan; Tamrat Assefa; Alemseged Beyene; Pacifique Ndayishimiye; Minyahil Alebachew Woldu
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2019-10-01

4.  (More than) doubling down: Effective fibrinolysis at a reduced rt-PA dose for catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with histotripsy.

Authors:  Samuel A Hendley; Aarushi Bhargava; Christy K Holland; Geoffrey D Wool; Osman Ahmed; Jonathan D Paul; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessment of histological characteristics, imaging markers, and rt-PA susceptibility of ex vivo venous thrombi.

Authors:  Samuel A Hendley; Alexey Dimov; Aarushi Bhargava; Erin Snoddy; Daniel Mansour; Rana O Afifi; Geoffrey D Wool; Yuanyuan Zha; Steffen Sammet; Zheng Feng Lu; Osman Ahmed; Jonathan D Paul; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.